Literature DB >> 3881966

Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study.

F P Hadlock, R B Harrist, R S Sharman, R L Deter, S K Park.   

Abstract

In utero estimates of fetal weight were evaluated prospectively in 109 fetuses with the use of sonographic models developed in a previous study. This report confirms that the best in utero weight estimates result from the use of models based on measurements of head size, abdominal size, and femur length. Since the accuracy of these models (1 SD = 7.5%) is significantly better than those based on measurements of head and body (e.g., biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference), we recommend routine use of such models in obstetric sonography.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3881966     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  361 in total

1.  Analysis of fetal biometric measurements in the last 30 years.

Authors:  Giorgia Buscicchio; Vincenzo Milite; Laura D'Emidio; Maurizio Giorlandino; Alessandro Cavaliere; Francesco Padula; Andrea Luigi Tranquilli; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2008-01

2.  MRI findings in multifetal pregnancies complicated by twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAP).

Authors:  Carolina V A Guimaraes; Beth M Kline-Fath; Leann E Linam; Maria A Calvo Garcia; Eva I Rubio; Foong-Yen Lim
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-12-22

3.  Fetal growth restriction and methylation of growth-related genes in the placenta.

Authors:  Xirong Xiao; Yan Zhao; Rong Jin; Jiao Chen; Xiu Wang; Andrea Baccarelli; Yunhui Zhang
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.778

4.  Intermediate Diastolic Velocity as a Parameter of Cardiac Dysfunction in Growth-Restricted Fetuses.

Authors:  Xiangna Tang; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Maynor Garcia; Homam Saker; Steven J Korzeniewski; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.587

5.  Assessment of uterine artery geometry and hemodynamics in human pregnancy with 4d flow mri and its correlation with doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Eileen Hwuang; Marta Vidorreta; Nadav Schwartz; Brianna F Moon; Kirpal Kochar; Matthew Dylan Tisdall; John A Detre; Walter R T Witschey
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term.

Authors:  W Siggelkow; M Schmidt; C Skala; D Boehm; S von Forstner; H Koelbl; A Tresch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 7.  Three- and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetric practice: does it help?

Authors:  Luís F Gonçalves; Wesley Lee; Jimmy Espinoza; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  M Alberry; P Soothill
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.747

9.  The fetal cardiovascular response to increased placental vascular impedance to flow determined with 4-dimensional ultrasound using spatiotemporal image correlation and virtual organ computer-aided analysis.

Authors:  Neil Hamill; Roberto Romero; Sonia Hassan; Wesley Lee; Stephen A Myers; Pooja Mittal; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Mamtha Balasubramaniam; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Edi Vaisbuch; Jimmy Espinoza; Francesca Gotsch; Luis F Goncalves; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Offer Erez; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Lami Yeo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Sex differences in fetal growth responses to maternal height and weight.

Authors:  Michelle Lampl; Francesca Gotsch; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Ricardo Gomez; Jyh Kae Nien; Edward A Frongillo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.