Literature DB >> 22439020

Analysis of fetal biometric measurements in the last 30 years.

Giorgia Buscicchio1, Vincenzo Milite, Laura D'Emidio, Maurizio Giorlandino, Alessandro Cavaliere, Francesco Padula, Andrea Luigi Tranquilli, Claudio Giorlandino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare fetal biometric measurements with standard growth charts for ultrasound parameters existing from the last 30 years. STUDY
DESIGN: A preliminary prospective study.
SETTING: Artemisia Mean Centre of Perinatal Diagnosis, Rome,Italy. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: A cross sectional study involving 1000 pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy between 14(th) and 41(th) weeks of gestation from 1 January to 30 June 2008. All recruited pregnant women enrolled had an abdominal ultrasonography for fetal biometry. For each measurement, regression models were fitted to estimate the mean and SD. The results were compared with existing references from the last 30 years using Student's T distribution. Moreover, neonatal weights were obtained from 1977 to 2008 by ISTAT.
RESULTS: One thousand normal fetuses from pregnant women, between 22(th) and 23(th) weeks, between 32(th) and 33(th) weeks and at 38(th) week, were thoroughly measured. THERE WERE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES FROM THE COMPARISON WITH OUR DATA FOR EACH GESTATIONAL AGE: femur length and homer length, abdominal circumference, head circumference and occipitofrontal diameter were longer than all parameters of existing references from the last 30 years. The analysis of neonatal weights on ISTAT data from 1977 to 2007 demonstrated a significant increment through the years.
CONCLUSION: Fetus is grown up across the years. It is necessary to modify the standard growth charts for ultrasound parameters existing from the last 30 years with actually fetal biometric measurements. It is helpful for a correct clinical approach and for an appropriate management mother-fetus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  estimation weight; fetal biometry birth weight

Year:  2008        PMID: 22439020      PMCID: PMC3279085     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prenat Med        ISSN: 1971-3282


  5 in total

1.  Fetal biometry at 4300 m compared to sea level in Peru.

Authors:  E Krampl; C Lees; J M Bland; J Espinoza Dorado; G Moscoso; S Campbell
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Individualized growth charts for ultrasound measurements can significantly improve fetal monitoring.

Authors:  P Schmidt; I Staboulidou; P Soergel; P Hillemanns; A Scharf
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; R S Sharman; R L Deter; S K Park
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R L Deter; R B Harrist; S K Park
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Fetal biometry in different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Y Jacquemyn; S U Sys; P Verdonk
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.079

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Reference interval for fetal biometry in Italian population.

Authors:  Maurizio Giorlandino; Francesco Padula; Pietro Cignini; Marialuisa Mastrandrea; Roberto Vigna; Giorgia Buscicchio; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2009-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.