Literature DB >> 20174814

A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term.

W Siggelkow1, M Schmidt, C Skala, D Boehm, S von Forstner, H Koelbl, A Tresch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to find a method of improving the accuracy of fetal birth weight estimation on the basis of traditional ultrasonographic measurements of the head, thorax, and femur at term. In this context, we analyzed a novel regression method comparing to existing algorithms.
METHODS: The delivery records of two hospitals were searched for women who delivered macrosomic infants, and the patients' medical records were retrospectively reviewed in order to derive clinical and ultrasonographic data at term. A total of 223 patients with macrosomic infants (birth weight > 4,000 g) were identified. These patients were complemented by data for 212 women who had ultrasound fetal assessments of less than 4,000 g. We used the method of isotonic regression to construct a birth weight prediction function that increases monotonically with each of the input variables and which minimizes the empirical quadratic loss.
RESULTS: A suspicion of macrosomia was based on a history of macrosomia, fundal height, and sonographic weight estimation >4,000 g. The mean period between ultrasound weight estimation and delivery was 7.2 days. The ability of the biometric algorithms developed to predict fetal weight at term ranged between a mean absolute error of 312 and 344 g, given a confidence interval of 95%. We demonstrate that predictions of birth weight on the basis of ultrasound data can be improved significantly, if an isotonic regression model is used instead of a linear regression model.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ultrasound detection of macrosomia can be improved using the isotonic regression method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20174814      PMCID: PMC3035787          DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1390-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  24 in total

1.  Clinical vs. sonographic estimate of birth weight in term parturients. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  N W Hendrix; C S Grady; S P Chauhan
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound in the third trimester.

Authors:  G G Nahum; H Stanislaw
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Maternal body mass, proportional weight gain, and fetal growth in parous women.

Authors:  M J Shepard; L S Bakketeig; G Jacobsen; T O'Connor; M B Bracken
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  [Is a quantitatively exact prediction of expected birth weight possible using the sonographically determined parameters of biparietal diameter, thoracic diameter and length of the humerus? A prospective study of 285 pregnant patients].

Authors:  S Göttlicher; J Madjaric
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1988

5.  Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements.

Authors:  S P Chauhan; D J West; J A Scardo; J M Boyd; J Joiner; N W Hendrix
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction.

Authors:  R J Sokol; L Chik; M P Dombrowski; I E Zador
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 centimeters or more.

Authors:  A Jazayeri; J A Heffron; R Phillips; W N Spellacy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; R S Sharman; R L Deter; S K Park
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Weight percentile at birth. II. Prediction by endocrinological and sonographic measurements.

Authors:  I Gerhard; B Vollmar; B Runnebaum; K Klinga; U Haller; F Kubli
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetus.

Authors:  Zeev Weiner; Izhar Ben-Shlomo; Ronit Beck-Fruchter; Yael Goldberg; Eliezer Shalev
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 2.435

View more
  1 in total

1.  The combination of symphysis-fundal height and abdominal circumference as a novel predictor of macrosomia in GDM and normal pregnancy.

Authors:  Zhi Guo Chen; Ya Ting Xu; Lu Lu Ji; Xiao Li Zhang; Xiao Xing Chen; Rui Liu; Chao Wu; Yan Ling Wang; Han Yang Hu; Lin Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.