Literature DB >> 3879733

A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception.

R B Post, H W Leibowitz.   

Abstract

The analysis of motion perception historically has included efferent as well as afferent mechanisms to account for the perception of motion during eye movement. The application of efferent mechanisms to motion perception has been limited, however, by several illusions which are apparently inconsistent with the notion that oculomotor mechanisms contribute to motion perception. An alternative account is presented of the manner in which efference may contribute to the perception of motion. It is proposed that distinct smooth eye-movement systems contribute differentially to object motion perception. Specifically, activity in the smooth pursuit system gives rise to the perception of object motion, whereas activity in the smooth component of reflexive eye movements does not. Tracking of a moving object results in object motion perception as a result of efference in the pursuit system. However, the pursuit system may be activated to oppose the smooth component of reflexive eye movements in order to preserve fixation on a stationary object. In such cases neither the fixated object nor the eye is moving but illusory movement results from the efference in the pursuit system. A number of illusory movement phenomena are interpreted in terms of this model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3879733     DOI: 10.1068/p140631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  19 in total

1.  Relationship of induced motion and apparent straight-ahead shifts to optokinetic stimulus velocity.

Authors:  R B Post; L A Lott
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

2.  Role of vestibular and neck inputs for the perception of object motion in space.

Authors:  T Mergner; G Rottler; H Kimmig; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Frame of reference transformations in motion perception during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jan L Souman; Ignace Th C Hooge; Alexander H Wertheim
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Vergence effects on the perception of motion-in-depth.

Authors:  Harold T Nefs; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Induced motion of a fixated target: influence of voluntary eye deviation.

Authors:  T Heckmann; R B Post; L Deering
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-09

6.  Optokinetic stimulation induces illusory movement of both out-of-the-body and on-the-body hand-held visual objects.

Authors:  P Revol; A Farnè; L Pisella; N P Holmes; A Imai; K Susami; K Koga; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of peripheral stimuli on the amount and direction of autokinesis.

Authors:  E J MacDuffee; C L Shupert; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-04

8.  A reevaluation of the effect of velocity on induced motion.

Authors:  R B Post; D Chi; T Heckmann; M Chaderjian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

9.  Suppression of OKN and VOR by afterimages and imaginary objects.

Authors:  I P Howard; D Giaschi; C M Murasugi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Saccadic compensation for reflexive optokinetic nystagmus just as good as compensation for volitional pursuit.

Authors:  James J Harrison; Tom C A Freeman; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.