Literature DB >> 17643235

Vergence effects on the perception of motion-in-depth.

Harold T Nefs1, Julie M Harris.   

Abstract

When the eyes follow a target that is moving directly towards the head they make a vergence eye movement. Accurate perception of the target's motion requires adequate compensation for the movements of the eyes. The experiments in this paper address the issue of how well the visual system compensates for vergence eye movements when viewing moving targets. We show that there are small but consistent biases across observers: When the eyes follow a target that is moving in depth, it is typically perceived as slower than when the eyes are kept stationary. We also analysed the eye movements that were made by observers. We found that there are considerable differences between observers and between trials, but we did not find evidence that the gains and phase lags of the eye movements were related to psychophysical performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17643235     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1046-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Smooth eye movements and spatial localisation.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Through the eye, slowly: delays and localization errors in the visual system.

Authors:  J Schlag; M Schlag-Rey
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Dynamic random-dot stereograms reveal up-down anisotropy and left-right isotropy between cortical hemifields.

Authors:  B Breitmeyer; B Julesz; W Kropfl
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-01-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Perceived head-centric speed is affected by both extra-retinal and retinal errors.

Authors:  T C Freeman; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Hemifield differences in perceived velocity.

Authors:  A T Smith; P Hammond
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Position constancy during pursuit eye movement: an investigation of the Filehne illusion.

Authors:  A Mack; E Herman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Stereoscopic depth movement: two eyes less sensitive than one.

Authors:  C W Tyler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception.

Authors:  R B Post; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  C J Erkelens; H Collewijn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Velocity discrimination in central and peripheral visual field.

Authors:  G A Orban; F Van Calenbergh; B De Bruyn; H Maes
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  2 in total

1.  Two independent mechanisms for motion-in-depth perception: evidence from individual differences.

Authors:  Harold T Nefs; Louise O'Hare; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-12

2.  Learning the 3-D structure of objects from 2-D views depends on shape, not format.

Authors:  Moqian Tian; Daniel Yamins; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.