Literature DB >> 1754364

Induced motion of a fixated target: influence of voluntary eye deviation.

T Heckmann1, R B Post, L Deering.   

Abstract

Induced motion (IM) was observed in a fixated target in the direction opposite to the real motion of a moving background. Relative to a fixation target located straight ahead, IM decreased when fixation was deviated 10 degrees in the same direction as background motion and increased when fixation was deviated 10 degrees opposite background motion. These results are consistent with a "nystagmus-suppression" hypothesis for subjective motion of fixated targets: the magnitude of illusory motion is correlated with the amount of voluntary efference required to oppose involuntary eye movements that would occur in the absence of fixation. In addition to the form of IM studied, this explanation applies to autokinesis, apparent concomitant motion, and the oculogyral illusion. Accounts of IM that stress visual capture of vection, afferent mechanisms, egocenter deviations, or phenomenological principles, although they may explain some forms of IM, do not account for the present results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1754364     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  32 in total

Review 1.  Induced movement in the visual modality: an overview.

Authors:  A H Reinhardt-Rutland
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Induced motion and apparent straight ahead during prolonged stimulation.

Authors:  R B Post; T Heckmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

3.  Motion habituation: inverted self-motion perception and optokinetic after-nystagmus.

Authors:  T Brandt; J Dichgans; W Büchle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception.

Authors:  R B Post; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Optokinetic reactions in man elicited by localized retinal motion stimuli.

Authors:  M F Dubois; H Collewijn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Induced movement based on subtraction of motion from the inducing object.

Authors:  I Rock; M Auster; M Schiffman; D Wheeler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Relative motion induced between stationary lines.

Authors:  K Nakayama; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Spatial induction of illusory motion.

Authors:  W C Gogel; B W Griffin
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Optokinetic and vection responses to apparent motion in man.

Authors:  C M Schor; V Lakshminarayanan; V Narayan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Induced motion considered as a visually induced oculogyral illusion.

Authors:  R B Post
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  2 in total

1.  Asymmetry of visuo-vestibular mechanisms contributes to reversal of optokinetic after-nystagmus.

Authors:  Jocelyne Ventre-Dominey; Marion Luyat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Judging object velocity during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  E Brenner; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.