Literature DB >> 2726403

A reevaluation of the effect of velocity on induced motion.

R B Post, D Chi, T Heckmann, M Chaderjian.   

Abstract

Induced motion (IM) was measured as a function of the temporal frequency of inducer oscillation. IM magnitude decreased as frequency increased above .5 Hz. Increasing the amplitude of inducer motion, and thereby its velocity, did not influence the temporal frequency dependence of IM. This suggests that it is the duration of inducer motion, rather than its velocity, that is the critical stimulus feature in studies that report decreased IM with higher frequencies of inducer oscillation. In a separate experiment, the optokinetic nystagmus elicited by the inducing stimulus in the absence of a fixation target displayed frequency-response characteristics similar to those of IM. This finding supports the hypothesis that IM magnitude is proportional to the voluntary effort required to suppress reflexive eye movements while maintaining stable fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2726403     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  15 in total

1.  Studies on visual perception of locomotion.

Authors:  G Johansson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  The sum of induced and real motion is not a straight path.

Authors:  R B Post; M Chaderjian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

3.  Induced motion and apparent straight ahead during prolonged stimulation.

Authors:  R B Post; T Heckmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

4.  A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception.

Authors:  R B Post; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Induced motion as a function of the speed of the inducing object, measured by means of two methods.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Adaptation in motion perception: alteration of induced motion.

Authors:  H Wallach; J Bacon; P Schulman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-12

7.  Implications of OKN suppression by smooth pursuit for induced motion.

Authors:  R B Post; C L Shupert; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-11

8.  Velocity storage, nystagmus, and visual-vestibular interactions in humans.

Authors:  B Cohen; V Henn; T Raphan; D Dennett
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Relative motion induced between stationary lines.

Authors:  K Nakayama; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Induced motion considered as a visually induced oculogyral illusion.

Authors:  R B Post
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  6 in total

1.  Relationship of induced motion and apparent straight-ahead shifts to optokinetic stimulus velocity.

Authors:  R B Post; L A Lott
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

2.  Observations on the adaptation of induced motion.

Authors:  R B Post; L A Lott
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-05

3.  Induced motion of a fixated target: influence of voluntary eye deviation.

Authors:  T Heckmann; R B Post; L Deering
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-09

4.  Egocentric and allocentric localization during induced motion.

Authors:  Robert B Post; Robert B Welch; David Whitney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Rhesus monkeys behave as if they perceive the Duncker Illusion.

Authors:  A Z Zivotofsky; M E Goldberg; K D Powell
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Accuracy and Tuning of Flow Parsing for Visual Perception of Object Motion During Self-Motion.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Li Li
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-05-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.