Literature DB >> 18664702

Multichannel compression: effects of reduced spectral contrast on vowel identification.

Stephanie Bor1, Pamela Souza, Richard Wright.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify if large numbers of wide dynamic range compression channels provide advantages for vowel identification and to measure its acoustic effects. Methods Eight vowels produced by 12 talkers in the /hVd/ context were compressed using 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 channels. Formant contrast indices (mean formant peak minus mean formant trough; maximum formant peak minus minimum formant trough) were developed to quantify spectral changes. Twenty listeners with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss identified the compressed vowels in an 8-alternative forced-choice procedure.
RESULTS: Formant contrast measures revealed significant spectral flattening for 6 of the 8 vowels as channel number increased. A significant decrease in vowel identification performance was also observed as spectral contrast decreased.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the number of wide dynamic range compression channels may not be beneficial for all speech signals, and individual vowel identification performance can vary greatly for listeners with similar hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18664702      PMCID: PMC2605015          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0009)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  37 in total

1.  Evaluation of spectral enhancement in hearing aids, combined with phonemic compression.

Authors:  B A Franck; C S van Kreveld-Bos; W A Dreschler; H Verschuure
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality.

Authors:  R A van Buuren; J M Festen; T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of F2 intensity on identity of /u/ in degraded listening conditions.

Authors:  Mark S Hedrick; Anna K Nabelek
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Tympanometric measures in older adults.

Authors:  T L Wiley; K J Cruickshanks; D M Nondahl; T S Tweed; R Klein; B E Klein
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise.

Authors:  M R Leek; V Summers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of multichannel compression on vowel and stop-consonant discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  T R Crain; E W Yund
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.

Authors:  D Kewley-Port; C S Watson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.

Authors:  J Kiessling; T Steffens
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1993

9.  Design of two syllabic nonlinear multichannel signal processors and the results of speech tests in noise.

Authors:  H E van Harten-de Bruijn; C S van Kreveld-Bos; W A Dreschler; H Verschuure
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand; L A Getty; M J Clark; K Wheeler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  22 in total

1.  Acoustical correlates of performance on a dynamic range compression discrimination task.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Frederick J Gallun; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility in explaining variance in susceptibility to temporal envelope distortion.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Richard A Wright; Michael C Blackburn; Rachael Tatman; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Consequences of broad auditory filters for identification of multichannel-compressed vowels.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Richard Wright; Stephanie Bor
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Classification of Hearing Aids Into Feature Profiles Using Hierarchical Latent Class Analysis Applied to a Large Dataset of Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Simon Lansbergen; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Comparing identification of standardized and regionally valid vowels.

Authors:  Richard Wright; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Infants' detection and discrimination of sounds in modulated maskers.

Authors:  Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Impact of advanced hearing aid technology on speech understanding for older listeners with mild to moderate, adult-onset, sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Jani A Johnson; Jingjing Xu
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.140

10.  Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Pamela Souza; Marc Brennan; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.