Literature DB >> 22894216

Impacts of age on memory for auditory intensity.

Frederick J Gallun1, Anna C Diedesch, Robertson Beasley.   

Abstract

It is hypothesized that older listeners are more likely than younger listeners to be impaired when asked to make intensity judgments about target tones embedded in rapidly presented auditory sequences. This study examined this hypothesis by asking listeners ranging in age from 19 to 74 yr to make judgments of intensity based on narrowband noise bursts varying in frequency and intensity. In two experiments, listeners made intensity judgments of target bursts alone or embedded in sequences of bursts. In the first experiment, one of four fixed sequences was presented and had to be identified. In the second experiment, pre- or post-trial bursts acted as cues that identified the frequency of the target burst in the sequence. In both experiments, intensity discrimination thresholds for single bursts were good predictors of performance with sequences and were little affected by age. Significant negative relationships between age and accuracy were observed when single sequences had to be identified or a post-trial cue was used, but no age effects were apparent when a pre-trial cue was used. These data are interpreted as being consistent with previous suggestions that the aging process results in a decline in auditory memory capacity and/or internally generated selective attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894216      PMCID: PMC3427361          DOI: 10.1121/1.4731235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  T Chi; Y Gao; M C Guyton; P Ru; S Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Aging and temporal discrimination in auditory sequences.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. I. Component frequency, temporal position, and silent intervals.

Authors:  C S Watson; H W Wroton; W J Kelly; C A Benbassat
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cuing effects for informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Updating and feature overwriting in short-term memory for timbre.

Authors:  Tom Mercer; Denis McKeown
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Development of speech sounds in children.

Authors:  S Eguchi; I J Hirsh
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1969

Review 8.  On short and long auditory stores.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Learning to detect auditory pattern components.

Authors:  M R Leek; C S Watson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. III. Frequency discrimination with components of well-learned patterns.

Authors:  M F Spiegel; C S Watson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Relating Suprathreshold Auditory Processing Abilities to Speech Understanding in Competition.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Laura Coco; Tess K Koerner; E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Michelle R Molis; David A Eddins; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) for auditory assessment: Validation in a young adult normal-hearing population.

Authors:  E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Trevor Stavropoulos; Eric C Hoover; David A Eddins; Frederick J Gallun; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.