Literature DB >> 3384261

Digital radiography of the gastrointestinal tract.

P J Feczko1, L V Ackerman, D J Kastan, R D Halpert.   

Abstract

The gastrointestinal tract lends itself quite well to digital imaging. Since fluoroscopy is already employed, the images can easily be obtained in digital format and several manufacturers have now developed systems for commercial use. Because of the type of pathology as well as the inherent subject contrast, it would appear the resolution requirements for digital imaging of the gastrointestinal tract are less than in other organ systems. The necessary resolution level is already technically available and feasible without significant cost. Digital imaging also holds promise of at least a modest reduction in radiation dose to the patient, as well as a reduction in costs, although these factors are operator dependent. However, digital imaging provides a latitude in performing the examination that is not available with screen-film systems. Finally, there is promise that by acquiring gastrointestinal images in digital format, manipulation of the images may help increase diagnostic accuracy by improving both technical and perceptive components of diagnosis. Not only will simple image manipulation be helpful but there is even potential for computer-assisted evaluation of gastrointestinal images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3384261     DOI: 10.1007/bf01889057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  11 in total

1.  Digital gastrointestinal imaging: the effect of pixel size on detection of subtle mucosal abnormalities.

Authors:  D J Kastan; L V Ackerman; P J Feczko
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Stomach and duodenum: radiographic magnification using computed radiography (CR).

Authors:  Y Nakano; K Togashi; K Nishimura; K Itoh; I Fujisawa; R Asato; H Adachi; H Itoh; K Torizuka
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.

Authors:  H MacMahon; C J Vyborny; C E Metz; K Doi; V Sabeti; S L Solomon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Videofluorography and pulsed fluoroscopy using a 512 X 512-pixel digital image system.

Authors:  D M Hynes; E W Edmonds; J A Rowlands; K R Krametz; W K Pack
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Noise analysis of a digital radiography system.

Authors:  B A Arnold; P O Scheibe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Assessment with digitized conventional radiographs.

Authors:  W D Foley; C R Wilson; G S Keyes; F A DiBianca; G T Scanlon; D Schleuter; T L Lawson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Clinical experience with combined videofluorography and pulsed fluoroscopy.

Authors:  D M Hynes; E W Edmonds; K R Krametz; D Baranoski; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Patient exposure requirements for high contrast resolution in digital radiographic systems.

Authors:  D Rimkus; N A Baily
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. II. Barium enema examination.

Authors:  D J Ott; D W Gelfand; N A Ramquist
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1980-04-30

10.  Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perception.

Authors:  F M Kelvin; R Gardiner; W Vas; G W Stevenson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  1 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal examinations with a 2,048- x 2,048-pixel image intensifier television digital radiography system.

Authors:  Y Baba; M Takahashi; T Tsuchigami; Y Higashida
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.