Literature DB >> 3800459

Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors.

J Boey, S K Choi, A Poon, T T Alagaratnam.   

Abstract

In order to validate a previously derived set of risk factors, 259 consecutive patients who had simple closure or definitive operation for perforated duodenal ulcers were studied prospectively. Major medical illness, preoperative shock, and longstanding perforation (more than 24 hours) correctly predicted the outcome in 93.8% of patients. Most importantly, 16 patients (6.2%) who died after operation could be identified (no false-negative error). The mortality rate increased progressively with increasing numbers of risk factors: 0%, 10%, 45.5%, and 100% in patients with none, one, two, and all three risk factors, respectively. These findings underscore the importance of patient selection and the feasibility of a risk grading system in guiding surgical management. Definitive surgery can be done safely in good-risk patients. Simple closure is preferable in those patients with uncomplicated perforations if any risk factor is present. Truncal vagotomy and drainage may be required if there is coexisting bleeding or stenosis. Nonoperative treatment deserves re-evaluation in patients with all three risk factors because of their uniformly dismal outcome after operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3800459      PMCID: PMC1492892          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198701000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  32 in total

1.  The late prognosis of perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  A C DEAN; C G CLARK; A H SINCLAIR-GIEBEN
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Acute perforated duodenal ulcer. An evaluation of surgical management.

Authors:  J L Sawyers; J L Herrington; J L Mulherin; W A Whitehead; B Mody; J Marsh
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-05

3.  Perforated gastroduodenal ulcer disease at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 1952 to 1970.

Authors:  G A Donaldson; F Jarrett
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Bacteria and septic complications in patients with perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  J Boey; J Wong; G B Ong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Growing indications for vagotomy in perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  J E Hamilton; P J Harbrecht
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1967-01

6.  The natural history of the perforated duodenal ulcer treated by suture plication.

Authors:  G E Griffin; C H Organ
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Proximal Gastric vagotomy without drainage for treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  P H Jordan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  The indications for simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  M J Playforth; M J McMahon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Perforations in acute duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  J Boey; N W Lee; J Wong; G B Ong
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1982-08

10.  The treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  P H Kay; K T Moore; R G Clark
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  83 in total

1.  Significant factors associated with fatal outcome in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Mario Testini; Piero Portincasa; Giuseppe Piccinni; Germana Lissidini; Fabio Pellegrini; Luigi Greco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Triple-ostomy: management of perforations to the second part of the duodenum in patients unfit for definitive surgery.

Authors:  P J J Herrod; D Kamali; S C B Pillai
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Siriluck Prapasrivorakul; Darin Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Surgeons' attitudes to the operative management of duodenal ulcer perforation and haemorrhage.

Authors:  M D Stringer; A E Cameron
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Predictors of mortality and morbidity in peritonitis in a developing country.

Authors:  Parwez Sajad Khan; Latif Ahmad Dar; Humera Hayat
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-09-01

6.  Over-the-scope-clip applications for perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Wei; Xue-Ping Xie; Ting-Ting Lian; Zhi-Yong Yang; Yu-Feng Pan; Zhen-Lv Lin; Guang-Wei Zheng; Ze-Hao Zhuang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Influence of age, comorbidity, type of operation and other variables on lethality and duration of post-operative hospital stay in patients with peptic ulcer. An analysis of 303 surgically treated patients.

Authors:  J Högel; R J Rieker; R Eisele; E Schmid
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1996

8.  Perforated peptic ulcer in South India: an institutional perspective.

Authors:  Sankar Arveen; Sadasivan Jagdish; Dharanipragada Kadambari
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Management of the difficult duodenal stump in penetrating duodenal ulcer disease: a comparative analysis of duodenojejunostomy with "classical" stump closure (Nissen-Bsteh).

Authors:  Yogesh K Vashist; Emre F Yekebas; Florian Gebauer; Michael Tachezy; Kai Bachmann; Alexandra König; Asad Kutup; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction of Patients with Perforation Peritonitis.

Authors:  Murugappan Nachiappan; Manjusha Madhusudhan Litake
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.