Literature DB >> 19513785

Perforated peptic ulcer in South India: an institutional perspective.

Sankar Arveen1, Sadasivan Jagdish, Dharanipragada Kadambari.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perforated peptic ulcer is one of the most common surgical emergencies in South India. The advent of medical therapy for peptic ulcer has remarkably decreased the number of elective surgical procedures. The incidence of perforated peptic ulcer on the contrary, is increasing. The high incidence of complications necessitates the identification of factors associated with the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing surgery for perforated peptic ulcer.
METHODS: Three hundred twenty-eight consecutive patients (299 men and 29 women) who underwent surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in our institute between November 2006 and June 2008 were studied prospectively.
RESULTS: The mean age was 43.4 +/- 14.4 years. The mean hospital stay was 10.9 +/- 6.8 days. Of the 328 patients, 58 presented with shock, 159 presented with delay more than 24 h, and 24 had co-morbid illness. Wound infection and intra-abdominal abscess were encountered in 12.5% and 13.4% of the patients, respectively. Altogether, 85 patients had postoperative complications. Twenty-eight (8.5%) patients died. The mortality rate among men and women was 7.9% and 20.7%, respectively. Age > or = 60 years, lag period longer than 24 h, presence of co-morbid illness, and shock at presentation were identified as independent predictors of postoperative complications. Shock at presentation, presence of co-morbid illness, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade III or more, and renal failure were identified as independent predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the delay in intervention and improving access to medical care may improve the outcome of patients undergoing surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. High-risk patients are those who present with shock and co-morbid illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19513785     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0056-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  23 in total

1.  Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  D Pai; A Sharma; R Kanungo; S Jagdish; A Gupta
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1999-03

2.  Surgical management of acute perforation of peptic ulcers. A single centre experience.

Authors:  J Lemaitre; W El Founas; Chr Simoens; Chr Ngongang; D Smets; P Mendes da Costa
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.090

3.  Perforated peptic ulcer: long-term results after simple closure in the elderly.

Authors:  L G Blomgren
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Declining incidence of peptic ulcer but not of its complications: a nation-wide study in The Netherlands.

Authors:  P N Post; E J Kuipers; G A Meijer
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Prognostic factors of peptic ulcer perforation.

Authors:  Ibrahim Barut; Omer R Tarhan; Celal Cerci; Nejda Karaguzel; Yusuf Akdeniz; Mahmut Bulbul
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Factors contributing to releak after surgical closure of perforated duodenal ulcer by Graham's Patch.

Authors:  K Kumar; D Pai; K Srinivasan; S Jagdish; N Ananthakrishnan
Journal:  Trop Gastroenterol       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec

7.  Perforated peptic ulcer: main factors of morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Carlos Noguiera; António Sérgio Silva; Jorge Nunes Santos; António Gomes Silva; Joaquim Ferreira; Eduarda Matos; Hernani Vilaça
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Management of perforated peptic ulcer in patients at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Ali K Bin-Taleb; Riyadh A Razzaq; Zaki O Al-Kathiri
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  The management of large perforations of duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta; Robin Kaushik; Rajeev Sharma; Ashok Attri
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2005-06-25       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  A prospective cohort study of postoperative complications in the management of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Smita S Sharma; Manju R Mamtani; Mamta S Sharma; Hemant Kulkarni
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  10 in total

1.  Impact of Drain Insertion After Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair in a Japanese Nationwide Database Analysis.

Authors:  K Okumura; K Hida; S Kunisawa; T Nishigori; H Hosogi; Y Sakai; Y Imanaka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Preoperative factors influencing mortality and morbidity in peptic ulcer perforation.

Authors:  P Sivaram; A Sreekumar
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Prognostic factors in peptic ulcer perforations: a retrospective 14-year study.

Authors:  Mutlu Unver; Özgür Fırat; Ömer Vedat Ünalp; Alper Uğuz; Tufan Gümüş; Taylan Özgür Sezer; Şafak Öztürk; Tayfun Yoldaş; Sinan Ersin; Adem Güler
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

4.  Perforated duodenal ulcer in high risk patients: is percutaneous drainage justified?

Authors:  Aly Saber; Mohammad A Gad; Gouda M Ellabban
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-01

Review 5.  Perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Kenneth Thorsen; Ewen M Harrison; Juliane Bingener; Morten H Møller; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Jon Arne Søreide
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Clinical Significance of Candida in an Intraoperative Peritoneal Specimen with Perforation Peritonitis: An Institutional Perspective.

Authors:  Jagannath Pramod; Chellappa Vijayakumar; Krishnamachari Srinivasan; Nanda Kishore Maroju; Nagarajan Raj Kumar; Gopal Balasubramaniyan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-05

7.  Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio Associated with Prolonged Hospital Length of Stay Postpeptic Ulcer Perforation Repair: An Observational Descriptive Analysis.

Authors:  Omer Al-Yahri; Tamer Saafan; Husham Abdelrahman; Ammar Aleter; Ali Toffaha; Mustafa Hajjar; Hesham Aljohary; Rashad Alfkey; Ahmad Zarour; Saif Al-Mudares; Ayman El-Menyar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Incidence and short-term mortality from perforated peptic ulcer in Korea: a population-based study.

Authors:  Seungjin Bae; Ki-Nam Shim; Nayoung Kim; Jung Mook Kang; Dong-Sook Kim; Kyoung-Min Kim; Yu Kyung Cho; Sung Woo Jung
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Duodenal Perforation: Outcomes after Surgical Management at a Tertiary Care Centre-A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Srinivas Bojanapu; Ronak Atulbhai Malani; Samrat Ray; Vivek Mangla; Naimish Mehta; Samiran Nundy
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2020-10-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.