Literature DB >> 22903877

Management of the difficult duodenal stump in penetrating duodenal ulcer disease: a comparative analysis of duodenojejunostomy with "classical" stump closure (Nissen-Bsteh).

Yogesh K Vashist1, Emre F Yekebas, Florian Gebauer, Michael Tachezy, Kai Bachmann, Alexandra König, Asad Kutup, Jakob R Izbicki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Duodenal stump insufficiency after surgery for penetrating gastroduodenal ulcer is associated with substantial mortality. "Classical" technique of closing a difficult duodenal stump (Nissen-Bsteh) has, up to now, not been compared with duodenojejunostomy (DJ) in larger patient sets. This also refers to the potential benefit of a gastric and biliary diversion under such conditions. The aim of the present study was to compare classical duodenal closure (CC) with DJ and to evaluate the impact of gastric and biliary diversion on postoperative outcome after surgery for penetrating, high-risk duodenal ulcer in a matched control study.
METHODS: Out of 321 patients, treated for penetrating duodenal ulcer disease, the perioperative outcome of 62 DJ patients was compared with 62 patients undergoing CC matched for age, gender, biliary diversion, and the operating surgeon collective. A total of 70 patients, equally distributed between DJ and CC subsets, received temporary biliary diversion.
RESULTS: Overall perioperative mortality was 10.5%. However, DJ significantly reduced the mortality rate (4.8%) associated with penetrating duodenal ulcer compared to CC (16.1%, P < 0.04). The overall morbidity in DJ patients nearly equalled that in the CC group (P = 0.4). Differences in the prevalence of duodenal leakage rate between DJ (14.5%) and CC (29%) patients were of borderline significance (P = 0.05). Temporary biliary diversion was identified as a prognostic factor for closure consistency with lower duodenal leakage rates in both DJ (odds ratio 0.05, 95% confidence interval 0.005-0.42) and CC patients (odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.6). In contrast, gastric diversion performed in a subset of 35 DJ patients had no protective effect.
CONCLUSION: Duodenojejunostomy combined with temporary biliary diversion substantially improves perioperative outcome in management of penetrating duodenal ulcer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22903877     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-012-0990-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  56 in total

1.  METHOD OF SECURING THE DUODENAL STUMP.

Authors:  E C YASARGIL
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Controlled tube duodenostomy in the management of giant duodenal ulcer perforation: a new technique for a surgically challenging condition.

Authors:  Pawanindra Lal; Anubhav Vindal; N S Hadke
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Giant duodenal ulcer: a new look at a variant of a common illness.

Authors:  P Rathi; S Parikh; R H Kalro
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-01

4.  Technique of antroduodenectomy without ulcer excision as a safe alternative treatment for bleeding chronic duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  Moshe Schein
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Strictureplasty with a pedunculated jejunal patch in Crohn's disease of the duodenum.

Authors:  C F Eisenberger; J R Izbicki; D C Broering; C Bloechle; M Steffen; S B Hosch; C E Broelsch
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Difficult closures of the duodenal stump.

Authors:  R C Jones; R N McClelland; W H Zedlitz; G T Shires
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1967-05

7.  The therapeutic strategies in performing emergency surgery for gastroduodenal ulcer perforation in 130 patients over 70 years of age.

Authors:  K Tsugawa; N Koyanagi; M Hashizume; M Tomikawa; K Akahoshi; K Ayukawa; H Wada; K Tanoue; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

8.  Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers.

Authors:  F Y Lee; K L Leung; B S Lai; S S Ng; S Dexter; W Y Lau
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-01

Review 9.  Management of massive peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Frances K Y Cheung; James Y W Lau
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.806

10.  Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage as rescue therapy for symptomatic biliary leakage without biliary tract dilation after major surgery.

Authors:  Björn-Christian Link; Emre F Yekebas; Dean Bogoevski; Asad Kutup; Gerhard Adam; Jakob R Izbicki; Gerrit Krupski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  1 in total

1.  The selective use of laparoscopic repair is safe in high-risk patients suffering from perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Philip Wai Yan Chiu; Amy Siu Yan Kok; Simon Kin Hung Wong; Enders Kwok Wai Ng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.