Literature DB >> 7081575

Bacteria and septic complications in patients with perforated duodenal ulcers.

J Boey, J Wong, G B Ong.   

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical significance of bacterial contamination in perforated duodenal ulcers, we prospectively studied septic complications in 184 consecutive patients. All patients received parenteral antibiotics (over 90 percent preoperatively) for at least 7 days. Thirteen infections developed in eight patients (4.3 percent). Peritoneal cultures, performed in 143 unselected patients, were positive in 33.6 percent of cases. Bacterial growth occurred more often and in heavier amounts in patients who underwent exploration late (after 48 hours) and those who had gross peritoneal soilage. Candida and gram-negative organisms predominated, but there was no correlation with pathogens that produced abscesses or wound infections. Old age and late exploration significantly increased the risk of infection. Neither peritoneal soiling nor a positive culture was likely to be clinically important when explorations was performed within 2 days of perforation. We treated perforated ulcers as clean-contaminated cases, and recommend that three doses of prophylactic antibiotics be begun preoperatively in all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7081575     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90182-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  9 in total

1.  A bacteriological study of perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  N Shinagawa; M Muramoto; S Sakurai; T Fukui; K Hori; M Taniguchi; K Mashita; A Mizuno; J Yura
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1991-01

2.  Perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  J Boey; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or bleeding peptic ulcers: 2013 WSES position paper.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Marco Bassi; Nazareno Smerieri; Michele Masetti; Francesco Ferrara; Carlo Fabbri; Luca Ansaloni; Stefania Ghersi; Matteo Serenari; Federico Coccolini; Noel Naidoo; Massimo Sartelli; Gregorio Tugnoli; Fausto Catena; Vincenzo Cennamo; Elio Jovine
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors.

Authors:  J Boey; S K Choi; A Poon; T T Alagaratnam
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The Perforation-Operation time Interval; An Important Mortality Indicator in Peptic Ulcer Perforation.

Authors:  Sushama Surapaneni; Rajkumar S; Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy A
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-05-01

6.  Giant duodenal ulcers after neurosurgery for brainstem tumors that required reoperation for gastric disconnection: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Chihoko Nobori; Kenjiro Kimura; Go Ohira; Ryosuke Amano; Sadaaki Yamazoe; Hiroaki Tanaka; Kentaro Naito; Toshihiro Takami; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Omental patch repair of large perforated peptic ulcers ≥25 mm is associated with higher leak rate.

Authors:  Yi Liang Wang; Xue Wei Chan; Kai Siang Chan; Vishal G Shelat
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-11-29

8.  Bacterial DNA patterns identified using paired-end Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes from whole blood samples of septic patients in the emergency room and intensive care unit.

Authors:  Monica Martins Pereira Faria; Brent Warren Winston; Michael Gordon Surette; John Maynard Conly
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Bacterial colonization of the stomach and duodenum in a Swedish population with and without proton pump inhibitor treatment.

Authors:  Jorge Alberto Arroyo Vázquez; Claes Henning; Per-Ola Park; Maria Bergström
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2019-10-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.