Literature DB >> 3783496

Phonotaxis in flying crickets. I. Attraction to the calling song and avoidance of bat-like ultrasound are discrete behaviors.

T G Nolen, R R Hoy.   

Abstract

The steering responses of three species of field crickets, Teleogryllus oceanicus, T. commodus, and Gryllus bimaculatus, were characterized during tethered flight using single tone-pulses (rather than model calling song) presented at carrier frequencies from 3-100 kHz. This range of frequencies encompasses the natural songs of crickets (4-20 kHz, Fig. 1) as well as the echolocation cries of insectivorous bats (12-100 kHz). The single-pulse stimulus paradigm was necessary to assess the aversive nature of high carrier frequencies without introducing complications due to the attractive properties of repeated pulse stimuli such as model calling songs. Unlike the natural calling song, single tone-pulses were not attractive and did not elicit positive phonotactic steering even when presented at the calling song carrier frequency (Figs. 2, 3, and 9). In addition to temporal pattern, phonotactic steering was sensitive to carrier frequency as well as sound intensity. Three discrete flight steering behaviors positive phonotaxis, negative phonotaxis and evasion, were elicited by appropriate combinations of frequency, temporal pattern and sound intensity (Fig. 12). Positive phonotactic steering required a model calling song temporal pattern, was tuned to 5 kHz and was restricted to frequencies below 9 kHz. Negative phonotactic steering, similar to the 'early warning' bat-avoidance behavior of moths, was produced by low intensity (55 dB SPL) tone-pulses at frequencies between 12 and 100 kHz (Figs. 2, 3, and 9). In contrast to model calling song, single tone-pulses of high intensity 5-10 kHz elicited negative phonotactic steering; low intensity ultrasound (20-100 kHz) produced only negative phonotactic steering, regardless of pulse repetition pattern. 'Evasive', side-to-side steering, similar to the 'last-chance' bat-evasion behavior of moths was produced in response to high intensity (greater than 90 dB) ultrasound (20-100 kHz). Since the demonstration of negative phonotactic steering did not require the use of a calling song temporal pattern, avoidance of ultrasound cannot be the result of systematic errors in localizing an inherently attractive stimulus when presented at high carrier frequencies. Unlike attraction to model calling song, the ultrasound-mediated steering responses were of short latency (25-35 ms) and were produced in an open loop manner (Fig. 4), both properties of escape behaviors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3783496     DOI: 10.1007/bf00604163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  15 in total

1.  TARGET DISCRIMINATION BY THE ECHOLOCATION OF BATS.

Authors:  D R GRIFFIN; J H FRIEND; F A WEBSTER
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1965-03

2.  [Spectrum of the calling songs, phonotaxis and the auditory system in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus].

Authors:  A V Popov; V F Shuvalov; A M Markovich
Journal:  Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol       Date:  1975 Sep-Oct

3.  Temporal pattern as a cue for species-specific calling song recognition in crickets.

Authors:  G S Pollack; R R Hoy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Phonotaxis in flying crickets. II. Physiological mechanisms of two-tone suppression of the high frequency avoidance steering behavior by the calling song.

Authors:  T G Nolen; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Postsynaptic inhibition mediates high-frequency selectivity in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: implications for flight phonotaxis behavior.

Authors:  T G Nolen; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Postembryonic development of adult motor patterns in crickets: a neural analysis.

Authors:  D R Bentley; R R Hoy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-12-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Initiation of behavior by single neurons: the role of behavioral context.

Authors:  T G Nolen; R R Hoy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation.

Authors:  S A Kick; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats.

Authors:  B D Lawrence; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  [Acoustic signals, behavior and systematics of some species of Gryllidae (Orthoptera, Ensifera)].

Authors:  Y Leroy
Journal:  Bull Biol Fr Belg       Date:  1966
View more
  18 in total

1.  Sensory cues for sound localization in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: interaural difference in response strength versus interaural latency difference.

Authors:  G S Pollack
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Auditory-evoked evasive manoeuvres in free-flying locusts and moths.

Authors:  J W Dawson; W Kutsch; R M Robertson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Firing-rate resonances in the peripheral auditory system of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Florian Rau; Jan Clemens; Victor Naumov; R Matthias Hennig; Susanne Schreiber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Effect of the temporal pattern of contralateral inhibition on sound localization cues.

Authors:  Gary Marsat; Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A behavioral role for feature detection by sensory bursts.

Authors:  Gary Marsat; Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Ultrasonic startle behavior in bushcrickets (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  F Libersat; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Neural coding of sound frequency by cricket auditory receptors.

Authors:  K Imaizumi; G S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Phonotaxis in flying crickets. II. Physiological mechanisms of two-tone suppression of the high frequency avoidance steering behavior by the calling song.

Authors:  T G Nolen; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Frequency as a releaser in the courtship song of two crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer) and Teleogryllus oceanicus: a neuroethological analysis.

Authors:  F Libersat; J A Murray; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  The cost of assuming the life history of a host: acoustic startle in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.

Authors:  M J Rosen; E C Levin; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.