Literature DB >> 1779422

Ultrasonic startle behavior in bushcrickets (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae).

F Libersat1, R R Hoy.   

Abstract

1. In the present work, we show that in flight, bushcrickets not previously known to respond to ultrasound alter their flight course in response to ultrasonic stimuli. Such stimuli elicit in flying Neoconocephalus ensiger an extension of the front and middle legs along the body and a rapid closure of all 4 wings (Fig. 1). This is a short latency acoustic startle response to ultrasound, consistent with acoustic startle responses of other insects. 2. The percentage of trials on which acoustic startle responses were elicited was maximum (90%) for sound frequencies ranging from 25 to at least 60 kHz. No acoustic startle response was observed at frequencies of 5 or 10 kHz (Fig. 2). The threshold for the response was roughly 76 dB between 25 to 60 kHz (Fig. 2) and the behavioral latency was 45 ms (Fig. 3). Recordings from flight muscles show that they cease discharging during the acoustic startle response (Fig. 4). 3. The characteristics of the acoustic startle response match those of an auditory interneuron called the T-neuron. The frequency sensitivity of this neuron is greatest for sound frequencies ranging from 13 to 60 kHz (Fig. 6). Moreover, we found that the neuron produces many more spikes to ultrasound (30 kHz) of increasing intensities than to a conspecific communication sound, whose dominant frequency is 14 kHz (Fig. 7).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1779422     DOI: 10.1007/bf00197663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  13 in total

1.  Flight Activity Initiated via Giant Interneurons of the Cockroach: Evidence for Bifunctional Trigger Interneurons.

Authors:  R E Ritzmann; M L Tobias; C R Fourtner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Neural circuits in the flight system of the locust.

Authors:  R M Robertson; K G Pearson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Phonotaxis in flying crickets. I. Attraction to the calling song and avoidance of bat-like ultrasound are discrete behaviors.

Authors:  T G Nolen; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Organization of a sensory neuropile in the auditory pathway of two groups of Orthoptera.

Authors:  H Römer; V Marquart; M Hardt
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-09-08       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Initiation of behavior by single neurons: the role of behavioral context.

Authors:  T G Nolen; R R Hoy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Audition in the praying mantis, Mantis religiosa L.: identification of an interneuron mediating ultrasonic hearing.

Authors:  D D Yager; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Ultrasound-triggered, flight-gated evasive maneuvers in the praying mantis Parasphendale agrionina. I. Free flight.

Authors:  D D Yager; M L May; M B Fenton
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Ultrasound-triggered, flight-gated evasive maneuvers in the praying mantis Parasphendale agrionina. II. Tethered flight.

Authors:  D D Yager; M L May
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Integration of ultrasound and flight inputs on descending neurons in the cricket brain.

Authors:  P D Brodfuehrer; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 10.  The neuroethology of acoustic startle and escape in flying insects.

Authors:  R Hoy; T Nolen; P Brodfuehrer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  20 in total

1.  Auditory-evoked evasive manoeuvres in free-flying locusts and moths.

Authors:  J W Dawson; W Kutsch; R M Robertson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Auditory-based defence against gleaning bats in neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  Hannah M ter Hofstede; Elisabeth K V Kalko; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Gliding behaviour elicited by lateral looming stimuli in flying locusts.

Authors:  Roger D Santer; Peter J Simmons; F Claire Rind
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Diversity of intersegmental auditory neurons in a bush cricket.

Authors:  Andreas Stumpner; Jorge Molina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Listening for males and bats: spectral processing in the hearing organ of Neoconocephalus bivocatus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  Gerlinde Höbel; Johannes Schul
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Sensory-encoding differences contribute to species-specific call recognition mechanisms.

Authors:  J D Triblehorn; J Schul
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Auditory change detection by a single neuron in an insect.

Authors:  Johannes Schul; Anne M Mayo; Jeffrey D Triblehorn
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Responses of a pair of flying locusts to lateral looming visual stimuli.

Authors:  Indika Benaragama; John R Gray
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Listening for bats: the hearing range of the bushcricket Phaneroptera falcata for bat echolocation calls measured in the field.

Authors:  J Schul; F Matt; O von Helversen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Serially homologous ears perform frequency range fractionation in the praying mantis, Creobroter (Mantodea, Hymenopodidae).

Authors:  D D Yager
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.