Literature DB >> 12607043

Sensory cues for sound localization in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: interaural difference in response strength versus interaural latency difference.

G S Pollack1.   

Abstract

Two potential sensory cues for sound location are interaural difference in response strength (firing rate and/or spike count) and in response latency of auditory receptor neurons. Previous experiments showed that these two cues are affected differently by intense prior stimulation; the difference in response strength declines and may even reverse in sign, but the difference in latency is unaffected. Here, I use an intense, constant tone to disrupt localization cues generated by a subsequent train of sound pulses. Recordings from the auditory nerve confirm that tone stimulation reduces, and sometimes reverses, the interaural difference in response strength to subsequent sound pulses, but that it enhances the interaural latency difference. If sound location is determined mainly from latency comparison, then behavioral responses to a pulse train following tone stimulation should be normal, but if the main cue for sound location is interaural difference in response strength, then post-tone behavioral responses should sometimes be misdirected. Initial phonotactic responses to the post-tone pulse train were frequently directed away from, rather than towards, the sound source, indicating that the dominant sensory cue for sound location is interaural difference in response strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12607043     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0388-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  13 in total

1.  Neural representation of sound amplitude by functionally different auditory receptors in crickets.

Authors:  K Imaizumi; G S Pollack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina.

Authors:  K L Shaw; D P Herlihy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Coupling of visual to auditory cues during phonotactic approach in the phaneropterine bushcricket Poecilimon affinis.

Authors:  D von Helversen; G Wendler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Encoding of sound localization cues by an identified auditory interneuron: effects of stimulus temporal pattern.

Authors:  Annie-Hélène Samson; Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Mate choice in tree crickets and their kin.

Authors:  W D Brown
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Neural coding of sound frequency by cricket auditory receptors.

Authors:  K Imaizumi; G S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Phonotaxis in flying crickets. I. Attraction to the calling song and avoidance of bat-like ultrasound are discrete behaviors.

Authors:  T G Nolen; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Processing of temporal information in the brain.

Authors:  C E Carr
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Sensory habituation of auditory receptor neurons: implications for sound localization.

Authors:  V Givois; G S Pollack
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Receptor cell habituation in the A1 auditory receptor of four noctuoid moths.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-09-22       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  5 in total

1.  A behavioral role for feature detection by sensory bursts.

Authors:  Gary Marsat; Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Temporal and directional processing by an identified interneuron, ON1, compared in cricket species that sing with different tempos.

Authors:  D Nicole Tunstall; Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets?

Authors:  R M Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Hyperacute directional hearing and phonotactic steering in the cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus deGeer).

Authors:  Stefan Schöneich; Berthold Hedwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  From microseconds to seconds and minutes-time computation in insect hearing.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Heiner Römer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.