Literature DB >> 3782610

Detection and intensity discrimination of a sinusoid.

T E Hanna, S M von Gierke, D M Green.   

Abstract

Intensity discrimination thresholds were measured for gated 100-ms, 1000-Hz tones. Discrimination thresholds were measured at several intensities near absolute threshold as well as at 30, 60, and 90 dB SPL. Psychometric functions were obtained for several of these discrimination conditions, and for detection of the signal in quiet. The results showed that Weber's law is approximately valid for standards as low as 0 dB SL. Small amounts of negative masking were observed even when the data were expressed in terms of increment energy. The psychometric functions for the discrimination conditions had a similar form and were shallower than the psychometric function for the detection of a signal in quiet. A similar set of conditions was run in the presence of a continuous, broadband noise. The results were generally in agreement with those obtained in quiet, but slight differences suggested that the variability which limits performance in the two conditions is different. The results are discussed in terms of the effects of nonlinear transduction, the effects of uncertainty, and contrast mechanisms as proposed by Laming [Sensory Analysis (Academic, London, 1986)].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3782610     DOI: 10.1121/1.394385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber's Law.

Authors:  E Francisco; V Tannan; Z Zhang; J Holden; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of external noise on detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Kim S Schairer; Lance Nizami; Samar Khaddam; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Six Degrees of Auditory Spatial Separation.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Alex Fox; Emily Orchard-Mills; Johahn Leung; David Alais
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-31

4.  Informational masking of negative masking.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Intensity-invariant coding in the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 6.  Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).

Authors:  Bhanu Shukla; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Percept of the duration of a vibrotactile stimulus is altered by changing its amplitude.

Authors:  Eric M Francisco; Jameson K Holden; Richard H Nguyen; Oleg V Favorov; Mark Tommerdahl
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-21

8.  Uncertainty about amplitude eliminates negative masking in a pure-tone amplitude discrimination experiment.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.