Literature DB >> 33589886

Uncertainty about amplitude eliminates negative masking in a pure-tone amplitude discrimination experiment.

Christopher Conroy1, Gerald Kidd1.   

Abstract

The role of uncertainty and its reduction in producing the "negative masking" of amplitude increments that is often observed in pure-tone amplitude discrimination experiments using circathreshold pedestals was investigated. It was found that negative masking is eliminated by uncertainty induced by roving the pedestal level across trials. On the basis of this finding, as well as those from a previous study, it is argued that, consistent with a longstanding theory of negative masking based on the notion of "intrinsic uncertainty," negative masking requires near-optimal stimulus conditions, under which uncertainty about increment parameters is more or less absent.
© 2021 Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33589886      PMCID: PMC7850013          DOI: 10.1121/10.0003042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JASA Express Lett


  20 in total

1.  Auditory intensity discrimination as a function of level-rove and tone duration in normal-hearing and impaired subjects: the "mid-level hump" revisited.

Authors:  Martin Pienkowski; Bjorn Hagerman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  The history of dipper functions.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Negative masking and the units problem in audition.

Authors:  Daniel Shepherd; Michael J Hautus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Masking functions and fixed-signal functions for low-level 1000-Hz tones.

Authors:  Daniel Shepherd; Michael J Hautus; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Intensity discrimination, increment detection, and magnitude estimation for 1-kHz tones.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detection and intensity discrimination of a sinusoid.

Authors:  T E Hanna; S M von Gierke; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Intensity perception. IV. Resolution in roving-level discrimination.

Authors:  J E Berliner; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Informational masking of negative masking.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Intensity discrimination: a severe departure from Weber's law.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Two tests of a neural attention hypothesis for auditory psychophysics.

Authors:  R D Luce; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.