Literature DB >> 3756693

Observer error in blood pressure measurement.

P D Neufeld, D L Johnson.   

Abstract

This paper describes an experiment undertaken to determine observer error in measuring blood pressure by the auscultatory method. A microcomputer was used to display a simulated mercury manometer and play back tape-recorded Korotkoff sounds synchronized with the fall of the mercury column. Each observer's readings were entered into the computer, which displayed a histogram of all readings taken up to that point and thus showed the variation among observers. The procedure, which could easily be adapted for use in teaching, was used to test 311 observers drawn from physicians, nurses, medical students, nursing students and others at nine health care institutions in Ottawa. The results showed a strong bias for even-digit readings and standard deviations of roughly 5 to 6 mm Hg. The standard deviation for the systolic readings was somewhat smaller for the physicians as a group than for the nurses (3.5 v. 5.9 mm Hg). However, the standard deviations for the diastolic readings were roughly equal for these two groups (approximately 5.5 mm Hg).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3756693      PMCID: PMC1491295     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  5 in total

1.  Auscultatory measurement of blood pressure performed by the doctor on duty.

Authors:  P E Nielsen; B Oxenboll; K Astvad; F Gyntelberg
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1975 Jul-Aug

2.  A SPHYGMOMANOMETER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGISTS.

Authors:  G A ROSE; W W HOLLAND; E A CROWLEY
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1964-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Observer factors in the measurement of blood pressure.

Authors:  J WILCOX
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1961       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  The diastolic dilemma.

Authors:  D Short
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-09-18

5.  Hypertension: what can go wrong when you measure blood pressure.

Authors:  M N Hill
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.220

  5 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based treatment of hypertension. Measurement of blood pressure: an evidence based review.

Authors:  F A McAlister; S E Straus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-14

2.  A note on the measurement of hypertension in HHANES.

Authors:  A T Geronimus; L J Neidert; J Bound
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Reproducibility of visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure measured as part of routine clinical care.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Cara Joyce; Emily B Levitan; Elizabeth Holt; Daichi Shimbo; Larry S Webber; Suzanne Oparil; Richard Re; Marie Krousel-Wood
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Predicted impact of various clinical practice strategies on cardiovascular risk for the treatment of hypertension: a clinical trial simulation study.

Authors:  Yuyan Jin; Robert Bies; Marc R Gastonguay; Yaning Wang; Norman Stockbridge; Jogarao Gobburu; Rajanikanth Madabushi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Misclassification and discordance of measured blood pressure from patient's true blood pressure in current clinical practice: a clinical trial simulation case study.

Authors:  Yuyan Jin; Robert Bies; Marc R Gastonguay; Norman Stockbridge; Jogarao Gobburu; Rajanikanth Madabushi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level.

Authors:  Hanna Tolonen; Päivikki Koponen; Androniki Naska; Satu Männistö; Grazyna Broda; Tarja Palosaari; Kari Kuulasmaa
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Testing for carryover effects after cessation of treatments: a design approach.

Authors:  S Gwynn Sturdevant; Thomas Lumley
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Quantitative Assessment of Blood Pressure Measurement Accuracy and Variability from Visual Auscultation Method by Observers without Receiving Medical Training.

Authors:  Wenai Chen; Fei Chen; Yong Feng; Aiqing Chen; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Office blood pressure measurement practices among community health providers (medical and paramedical) in northern district of India.

Authors:  Bishav Mohan; Naved Aslam; Upma Ralhan; Sarit Sharma; Naveen Gupta; Vivudh Pratap Singh; Shibba Takkar; G S Wander
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.