Literature DB >> 2240326

A note on the measurement of hypertension in HHANES.

A T Geronimus1, L J Neidert, J Bound.   

Abstract

Using data from the HHANES, we found the rates of elevated blood pressure readings on clinical examination to be extremely low for a sample of Mexican American and Puerto Rican women. The prevalence rates were one-fourth to one-fifth the rates found for a comparable sample of White women from NHANESII. These findings are discrepant with the little that is known about hypertension prevalence among Hispanics and with estimates of hypertension prevalence for Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans drawn from NHANESII. While our HHANES samples women had much lower rates of clinical high blood pressure than Whites, they reported hypertension histories in excess of Whites. Rates of medicine usage among Hispanics were insufficiently large for effective treatment to explain the disparity. The prevalence estimates increased, but the relative discrepancies remained when we altered our sample specifications and clinical high blood pressure measure. A possible explanation for these discrepancies is that few physicians performed the majority of blood pressure readings in our HHANES sample. This may have been statistically inefficient. The discrepancies noted suggest that HHANES may not be a reliable source of information on hypertension among Hispanic women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2240326      PMCID: PMC1405117          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.12.1437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of elevated mean arterial pressure in the second trimester.

Authors:  L C Chesley; B M Sibai
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Observer error in blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  P D Neufeld; D L Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Latino terminology: conceptual bases for standardized terminology.

Authors:  D E Hayes-Bautista; J Chapa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Hispanic/Latino--what's in a name?

Authors:  A Yankauer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  J F Kraus; N O Borhani; C E Franti
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Hypertension and sources of blood pressure variability among Mexican-Americans in Starr County, Texas.

Authors:  C L Hanis; R E Ferrell; W J Schull
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Prevalence, detection, and control of hypertension in a biethnic community. The San Antonio Heart Study.

Authors:  L J Franco; M P Stern; M Rosenthal; S M Haffner; H P Hazuda; P J Comeaux
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Three-year incidence of hypertension in thirteen U.S. communities. On behalf of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program cooperative group.

Authors:  A Y Apostolides; G Cutter; S A Daugherty; R Detels; J Kraus; S Wassertheil-Smoller; J Ware
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Hypertension in the Hispanic and black population in New York City.

Authors:  E Barrios; E Iler; K Mulloy; J Goldstein; D Chalfin; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Cardiovascular risk factors in Mexican Americans in Laredo, Texas. I. Prevalence of overweight and diabetes and distributions of serum lipids.

Authors:  S P Gaskill; C R Allen; V Garza; J L Gonzales; R H Waldrop
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  3 in total

1.  The art and science of interpreting survey data.

Authors:  C L Johnson; C E Woteki
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Race, intervening variables, and two components of low birth weight.

Authors:  J E Kallan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1993-08

3.  Adjusting for nonresponse bias in a health examination survey.

Authors:  M L Rowland; R N Forthofer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.