Literature DB >> 25326066

Predicted impact of various clinical practice strategies on cardiovascular risk for the treatment of hypertension: a clinical trial simulation study.

Yuyan Jin1, Robert Bies, Marc R Gastonguay, Yaning Wang, Norman Stockbridge, Jogarao Gobburu, Rajanikanth Madabushi.   

Abstract

Hypertension control rate in the US is low with the current clinical practice (JNC 7) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) remain is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. A 6-month clinical trial simulation case study testing different virtual clinical practice strategies was performed in an attempt to increase the control rate. The CVD risk was calculated using the Framingham CVD risk model at baseline and 6 months post-treatment. The estimated CVD events for the baseline patient sample without any treatment was 998 (95% CI: 967-1,026) over 6 months in 100,000 patients. Treating these patients for 6 months with current clinical practice, high dose strategy, high dose with low target BP strategy resulted in a reduction in CVD events of 191(95% CI: 169-205), 284 (95% CI: 261-305), and 353 (95% CI: 331-375), respectively. Hence the two alternative strategies resulted in an increase in treatment effect by 49% (95%CI: 44-59%) and 85% (95%CI: 79-99%), respectively. The increased safety with the current low dose strategy may potentially be offset by increased CVD risk in the time necessary to control hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25326066     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-014-9394-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  26 in total

1.  Risk stratification of coronary heart disease in Greece: final results from the CARDIO2000 Epidemiological Study.

Authors:  Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Christos Pitsavos; Christine Chrysohoou; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pavlos Toutouzas
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Success and predictors of blood pressure control in diverse North American settings: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT).

Authors:  William C Cushman; Charles E Ford; Jeffrey A Cutler; Karen L Margolis; Barry R Davis; Richard H Grimm; Henry R Black; Bruce P Hamilton; Joanne Holland; Chuke Nwachuku; Vasilios Papademetriou; Jeffery Probstfield; Jackson T Wright; Michael H Alderman; Robert J Weiss; Linda Piller; Judy Bettencourt; Sandra M Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Practice guidelines for primary care physicians: 2003 ESH/ESC hypertension guidelines.

Authors:  R Cifkova; S Erdine; R Fagard; C Farsang; A M Heagerty; W Kiowski; S Kjeldsen; T Lüscher; J M Mallion; G Mancia; N Poulter; K H Rahn; J L Rodicio; L M Ruilope; P van Zwieten; B Waeber; B Williams; A Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Baseline Characteristics and Early Blood Pressure Control in the CONVINCE Trial.

Authors:  Henry R. Black; William J. Elliott; James D. Neaton; Gregory Grandits; Patricia Grambsch; Richard H. Grimm; Lennart Hansson; Yves Lacoucière; James Muller; Peter Sleight; Michael A. Weber; William B. White; Gordon Williams; Janet Wittes; Alberto Zanchetti; T. Daniel Fakouhi; Robert J. Anders
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55,000 vascular deaths.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Gary Whitlock; Robert Clarke; Paul Sherliker; Jonathan Emberson; Jim Halsey; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Population PK-PD model for Fc-osteoprotegerin in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Matthew L Zierhut; Marc R Gastonguay; Steven W Martin; Paolo Vicini; Pirow J Bekker; Donna Holloway; Philip T Leese; Mark C Peterson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Misclassification and discordance of measured blood pressure from patient's true blood pressure in current clinical practice: a clinical trial simulation case study.

Authors:  Yuyan Jin; Robert Bies; Marc R Gastonguay; Norman Stockbridge; Jogarao Gobburu; Rajanikanth Madabushi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.745

9.  Identifying gaps between guidelines and clinical practice in the evaluation and treatment of patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Cathy B Spranger; Andrea J Ries; Carrie A Berge; Nina B Radford; Ronald G Victor
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 10.  Methodological issues in cardiovascular epidemiology: the risk of determining absolute risk through statistical models.

Authors:  Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Vassilis Stavrinos
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2006
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.