Literature DB >> 25173197

Office blood pressure measurement practices among community health providers (medical and paramedical) in northern district of India.

Bishav Mohan1, Naved Aslam2, Upma Ralhan3, Sarit Sharma4, Naveen Gupta2, Vivudh Pratap Singh2, Shibba Takkar2, G S Wander2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is directly responsible for 57% of all stroke deaths and 24% of all coronary heart disease deaths in India. Appropriate blood pressure measurement techniques are the cornerstone of clinical acumen. Despite the clear guidelines on BP measurement technique, there seems to be large inter-observer variations. AIM &
METHODS: A prospective, observational study was done to assess the knowledge and to study the current practices of office BP measurement among the 400 medical and paramedical staff working in various hospitals of a northern district of India. A single observer under the supervision of investigators observed all the participants and a proforma was filled based on AHA guidelines. After observing BP measurement technique scoring was done (≤ 8 question correct = inaccurate practices, >9 questions correct = accurate practices). Similarly, the knowledge was assessed by giving a pretested questionnaire.
RESULTS: 5.85 % of the medical staff had excellent knowledge and 80% of the doctors and 62% of the paramedical staff had good knowledge about BPM. Only 1.47% (3 doctors) and 0.5% (1 nurse) had accurate practices. There was no correlation between knowledge and practices.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the right technique and knowledge of blood pressure measurement among community health providers is inadequate and warrants further interventions to improve.
Copyright © 2014 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure measurement (BPM); Knowledge; Medical staff; Paramedical staff; Practice

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25173197      PMCID: PMC4150051          DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2014.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Heart J        ISSN: 0019-4832


  37 in total

1.  The world health report 2002 - reducing risks, promoting healthy life.

Authors:  J J Guilbert
Journal:  Educ Health (Abingdon)       Date:  2003-07

2.  Many physician practices fall short on accurate blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Mike Mitka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  How accurate are sphygmomanometers?

Authors:  D Mion; A M Pierin
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Observer error in blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  P D Neufeld; D L Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data.

Authors:  Patricia M Kearney; Megan Whelton; Kristi Reynolds; Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 15-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Terminal digit preference, random error, and bias in routine clinical measurement of blood pressure.

Authors:  S W Wen; M S Kramer; J Hoey; J A Hanley; R H Usher
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Influence of arm position on measurement of blood pressure.

Authors:  J Webster; D Newnham; J C Petrie; H G Lovell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-26

8.  Knowledge, attitude, behavior, and practice of interns toward errors in sphygmomanometer and blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Ramachandran Meenakshisundaram; Shah Sweni; Govindaraj Dhanalakshmi; Raju Sridevi; Ponniah Thirumalaikolundusubramanian
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  A practice guideline revisited: screening for hypertension.

Authors:  B Littenberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Optimal size of cuff bladder for indirect measurement of arterial pressure in adults.

Authors:  A E Russell; L M Wing; S A Smith; P E Aylward; R J McRitchie; R M Hassam; M J West; J P Chalmers
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hypertension prevalence as a function of different guidelines, India.

Authors:  Manisha Dubey; Sanjay Rastogi; Ashish Awasthi
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 9.408

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.