Literature DB >> 3752078

Probability and paternity testing.

R C Elston.   

Abstract

A probability can be viewed as an estimate of a variable that is sometimes 1 and sometimes 0. To have validity, the probability must equal the expected value of that variable. To have utility, the average squared deviation of the probability from the value of that variable should be small. It is shown that probabilities of paternity calculated by the use of Bayes' theorem under appropriate assumptions are valid, but they can vary in utility. In particular, a recently proposed probability of paternity has less utility than the usual one based on the paternity index. Using an arbitrary prior probability in the calculation cannot lead to a valid probability unless, by chance, the chosen prior probability happens to be appropriate. Appropriate assumptions regarding both the prior probability and gene or genotypic frequencies can be estimated from prior experience.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3752078      PMCID: PMC1684036     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  7 in total

1.  Basic fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index.

Authors:  C C Li; A Chakravarti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Guidelines for reporting estimates of probability of paternity.

Authors:  R H Walker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of the proportion of nonpaternity.

Authors:  R F Potthoff; M Whittinghill
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Estimating the prior probability of paternity from the results of exclusion tests.

Authors:  A Chakravarti; C C Li
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Some fallacies in the computation of paternity probabilities.

Authors:  M Aickin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Use of odds of paternity computations in determining the reliability of single exclusions in paternity testing.

Authors:  R Chakraborty; N Ryman
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  A note on positive identification of paternity by using genetic markers.

Authors:  P P Majumder; M Nei
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 0.444

  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  The prevalence of paternity in "one man" cases of disputed parentage.

Authors:  D H Kaye
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  HLA and the probability of paternity.

Authors:  R Borowsky
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity.

Authors:  R Chakraborty; T R Meagher; P E Smouse
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Bayesian interval estimation of genetic relationships: application to paternity testing.

Authors:  D E Goldgar; E A Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index: comments.

Authors:  R E Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  More on paternity.

Authors:  A G Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  An expository review of two methods of calculating the paternity probability.

Authors:  C C Li; A Chakravarti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) gray (Liliaceae).

Authors:  P E Smouse; T R Meagher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  PRRT2 c.649dupC mutation derived from de novo in paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia.

Authors:  Hong-Fu Li; Wang Ni; Zhi-Qi Xiong; Jianfeng Xu; Zhi-Ying Wu
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 5.243

10.  Social network analysis of the genealogy of strawberry: retracing the wild roots of heirloom and modern cultivars.

Authors:  Dominique D A Pincot; Mirko Ledda; Mitchell J Feldmann; Michael A Hardigan; Thomas J Poorten; Daniel E Runcie; Christopher Heffelfinger; Stephen L Dellaporta; Glenn S Cole; Steven J Knapp
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.154

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.