Literature DB >> 3400645

An expository review of two methods of calculating the paternity probability.

C C Li1, A Chakravarti.   

Abstract

There are two methods for calculating the posttests probability of paternity, viz., the nonexclusion probability method (E method) and the paternity index method (lambda method). This report reviews these two methods and explains the reasons behind them, in the hope that it might alleviate the current controversy between the advocates of these two methods. The emphasis throughout the paper is on exposition, using simple examples to illustrate certain principles or properties. A discussion follows the presentation of the two methods. The calculation of the paternity index is based on the genotype (or phenotype) of the accused man; and the value of the paternity index remains the same whether the accusation itself is true or false.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3400645      PMCID: PMC1715347     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  8 in total

1.  A matrix method for calculating recurrence risks of unilocal disorders for genetic counselling.

Authors:  D R Bolling; G A Chase; E A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  The use of matrices in calculating mendelian probabilities.

Authors:  C A Smith
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.670

3.  Probability and paternity testing.

Authors:  R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Likelihood inference of paternity.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  No fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index.

Authors:  M P Baur; R C Elston; H Gürtler; K Henningsen; K Hummel; H Matsumoto; W Mayr; J W Moris; L Niejenhuis; H Polesky
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Estimating the prior probability of paternity from the results of exclusion tests.

Authors:  A Chakravarti; C C Li
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Empirical validation of the Essen-Möller probability of paternity.

Authors:  M R Mickey; D W Gjertson; P I Terasaki
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to kinship problems.

Authors:  Klaas-Jan Slooten; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.686

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.