Literature DB >> 3163316

Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity.

R Chakraborty1, T R Meagher, P E Smouse.   

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that polymorphic genetic markers are potentially helpful in resolving genealogical relationships among individuals in a natural population. Genetic data provide opportunities for paternity exclusion when genotypic incompatibilities are observed among individuals, and the present investigation examines the resolving power of genetic markers in unambiguous positive determination of paternity. Under the assumption that the mother for each offspring in a population is unambiguously known, an analytical expression for the fraction of males excluded from paternity is derived for the case where males and females may be derived from two different gene pools. This theoretical formulation can also be used to predict the fraction of births for each of which all but one male can be excluded from paternity. We show that even when the average probability of exclusion approaches unity, a substantial fraction of births yield equivocal mother-father-offspring determinations. The number of loci needed to increase the frequency of unambiguous determinations to a high level is beyond the scope of current electrophoretic studies in most species. Applications of this theory to electrophoretic data on Chamaelirium luteum (L.) shows that in 2255 offspring derived from 273 males and 70 females, only 57 triplets could be unequivocally determined with eight polymorphic protein loci, even though the average combined exclusionary power of these loci was 73%. The distribution of potentially compatible male parents, based on multilocus genotypes, was reasonably well predicted from the allele frequency data available for these loci. We demonstrate that genetic paternity analysis in natural populations cannot be reliably based on exclusionary principles alone. In order to measure the reproductive contributions of individuals in natural populations, more elaborate likelihood principles must be deployed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3163316      PMCID: PMC1203306     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  20 in total

1.  Tables and nomogram for calculating chances of excluding paternity.

Authors:  W C BOYD
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1954-12       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  The estimation of pairwise relationships.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 1.670

3.  On the Estimation of the Frequency of Nonpaternity.

Authors:  J W Maccluer; W J Schull
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Individual-specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; V Wilson; S L Thein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jul 4-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Probability and paternity testing.

Authors:  R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  DNA fingerprints applied to animal and bird populations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 May 14-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Paternity index and attribution of paternity.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  Mouse DNA 'fingerprints': analysis of chromosome localization and germ-line stability of hypervariable loci in recombinant inbred strains.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; V Wilson; R Kelly; B A Taylor; G Bulfield
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-04-10       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Multiple paternity in Belding's ground squirrel litters.

Authors:  J Hanken; P W Sherman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Empirical validation of the Essen-Möller probability of paternity.

Authors:  M R Mickey; D W Gjertson; P I Terasaki
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  21 in total

1.  Assessing probability of ancestry using simple sequence repeat profiles: applications to maize hybrids and inbreds.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Jon D Seltzer; Chongqing Xie; Deanne L Wright; J Stephen C Smith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Assessment of ancestry probabilities in the presence of genotyping errors.

Authors:  Hongmei Zhang; Hal Stern
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.

Authors:  Eric C Anderson; John Carlos Garza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  BARCSoySNP23: a panel of 23 selected SNPs for soybean cultivar identification.

Authors:  M S Yoon; Q J Song; I Y Choi; J E Specht; D L Hyten; P B Cregan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Using genetic markers to directly estimate gene flow and reproductive success parameters in plants on the basis of naturally regenerated seedlings.

Authors:  J Burczyk; W T Adams; D S Birkes; I J Chybicki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Characterization of highly variable (GA/CT) n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa.

Authors:  B D Dow; M V Ashley; H F Howe
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Exclusion probabilities for pedigree testing farm animals.

Authors:  K G Dodds; M L Tate; J C McEwan; A M Crawford
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Properties of maximum likelihood male fertility estimation in plant populations.

Authors:  M T Morgan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inferring contemporary dispersal processes in plant metapopulations: comparison of direct and indirect estimates of dispersal for the annual species Crepis sancta.

Authors:  A Dornier; P-O Cheptou
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  A class of population genetic questions formulated as the generalized occupancy problem.

Authors:  R Chakraborty
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.