Literature DB >> 8138167

Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) gray (Liliaceae).

P E Smouse1, T R Meagher.   

Abstract

Genealogical analysis is a powerful tool for analysis of reproductive performance in both natural and captive populations, but assignment of paternity has always been a stumbling block for this sort of work. Statistical methods for determining paternity have undergone several phases of development, ranging from straightforward genetic exclusion to assignment of paternity based on genetic likelihood criteria. In the present study, we present a genetic likelihood-based iterative procedure for fractional allocation of paternity within a progeny pool and apply this method to a population of Chamaelirium luteum, a dioecious member of the Liliaceae. Results from this analysis clearly demonstrate that different males make unequal contributions to the overall progeny pool, with many males contributing essentially nothing to the next generation. Furthermore, the distribution of paternal success among males shows a highly significant departure from (Poisson) randomness. The results from the present analysis were compared with earlier results obtained from the same data set, using likelihood-based categorical paternity assignments. The general biological pattern revealed by the two analyses is the same, but the estimates of reproductive success are only modestly (though significantly) correlated. The iterative procedure makes more complete use of the data and generates a more sharply resolved distribution of male reproductive success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8138167      PMCID: PMC1205782     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  27 in total

1.  Deterministic paternity exclusion using RAPD markers.

Authors:  P O Lewis; A A Snow
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Analysis of the VNTR locus D1S80 by the PCR followed by high-resolution PAGE.

Authors:  B Budowle; R Chakraborty; A M Giusti; A J Eisenberg; R C Allen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.

Authors:  J G Williams; A R Kubelik; K J Livak; J A Rafalski; S V Tingey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Individual-specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; V Wilson; S L Thein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jul 4-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Probability and paternity testing.

Authors:  R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Hypervariable 'minisatellite' regions in human DNA.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; V Wilson; S L Thein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Mar 7-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; J Stewart
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 8.  The evolution of plant reproductive characters; sexual versus natural selection.

Authors:  D Charlesworth; D W Schemske; V L Sork
Journal:  Experientia Suppl       Date:  1987

9.  Detection of highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in a species with little allozyme polymorphism.

Authors:  C R Hughes; D C Queller
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Multiple paternity in Belding's ground squirrel litters.

Authors:  J Hanken; P W Sherman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Assessing probability of ancestry using simple sequence repeat profiles: applications to maize hybrids and inbreds.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Jon D Seltzer; Chongqing Xie; Deanne L Wright; J Stephen C Smith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Using empirical data to model transgene dispersal.

Authors:  T R Meagher; F C Belanger; P R Day
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A graphical approach to relatedness inference.

Authors:  Anthony Almudevar
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Properties of maximum likelihood male fertility estimation in plant populations.

Authors:  M T Morgan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Statistical approaches to paternity analysis in natural populations and applications to the North Atlantic humpback whale.

Authors:  R Nielsen; D K Mattila; P J Clapham; P J Palsbøll
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Transmission advantage favors selfing allele in experimental populations of self-incompatible Witheringia solanacea (solanaceae).

Authors:  Judy L Stone; Emily J VanWyk; Jennifer R Hale
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Estimating differential reproductive success from nests of related individuals, with application to a study of the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi.

Authors:  Beatrix Jones; Gary D Grossman; Daniel C I Walsh; Brady A Porter; John C Avise; Anthony C Fiumera
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?

Authors:  Brett S Younginger; Dagmara Sirová; Mitchell B Cruzan; Daniel J Ballhorn
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 1.936

9.  Mixed mating system and variable mating patterns in tropical woody bamboos.

Authors:  Ning Xie; Ling-Na Chen; Yu-Ran Dong; Han-Qi Yang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.215

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.