Literature DB >> 9556669

Basic fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index.

C C Li1, A Chakravarti.   

Abstract

Some basic fallacies in the computation of the paternity index have been pointed out. The general finding that the true fathers' mean paternity index is greater than that of nonfathers is a necessary consequence of an algebraic identity, having nothing to do with paternity or nonpaternity. It has also been shown that the paternity index is not a likelihood ratio as claimed. The fact that a paternity index may frequently take values less than unity leads to absurd conclusions regarding the probability of paternity. A formula relating prior and posterior probabilities of paternity, based solely on genetic marker testing results (exclusion or nonexclusion), is reiterated as a substitute for the current paternity index.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 9556669      PMCID: PMC1684625     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  4 in total

1.  Estimating the prior probability of paternity from the results of exclusion tests.

Authors:  A Chakravarti; C C Li
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Paternity index and attribution of paternity.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  Some fallacies in the computation of paternity probabilities.

Authors:  M Aickin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A note on positive identification of paternity by using genetic markers.

Authors:  P P Majumder; M Nei
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 0.444

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index: A reply to Dr. Jack Valentin's comments.

Authors:  C C Li; A Chakravarti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Steinberg's new paternity probability.

Authors:  C C Li
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Bayesian interval estimation of genetic relationships: application to paternity testing.

Authors:  D E Goldgar; E A Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Probability and paternity testing.

Authors:  R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Likelihood inference of paternity.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index: comments.

Authors:  R E Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  No fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index.

Authors:  M P Baur; R C Elston; H Gürtler; K Henningsen; K Hummel; H Matsumoto; W Mayr; J W Moris; L Niejenhuis; H Polesky
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  More on paternity.

Authors:  A G Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) gray (Liliaceae).

Authors:  P E Smouse; T R Meagher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.