Literature DB >> 3746189

Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.

J E Mazur.   

Abstract

Pigeons chose between alternatives that differed in the number of reinforcers and in the delay to each reinforcer. A peck on a red key produced the same consequences on every trial within a condition, but between conditions the number of reinforcers varied from one to three and the reinforcer delays varied between 5 s and 30 s. A peck on a green key produced a delay of adjustable duration and then a single reinforcer. The green-key delay was increased or decreased many times per session, depending on a subject's previous choices, which permitted estimation of an indifference point, or a delay at which a subject chose each alternative about equally often. The indifference points decreased systematically with more red-key reinforcers and with shorter red-key delays. The results did not support the suggestion of Moore (1979) that multiple delayed reinforcers have no effect on preference unless they are closely grouped. The results were well described in quantitative detail by a simple model stating that each of a series of reinforcers increases preference, but that a reinforcer's effect is inversely related to its delay. The success of this model, which considers only delay of reinforcement, suggested that the overall rate of reinforcement for each alternative had no effect on choice between those alternatives.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3746189      PMCID: PMC1348257          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects on preference of reinforcement delay, number of reinforcers, and terminal-link duration.

Authors:  W R Poniewaz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice and multiple reinforcers.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and number of reinforcers.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Secondary reinforcement and number of primary reinforcements.

Authors:  E Fantino; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur; M Snyderman; D Coe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1985-10
View more
  24 in total

1.  Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.

Authors:  R C Grace; J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Building blocks of self-control: increased tolerance for delay with bundled rewards.

Authors:  George Ainslie; John R Monterosso
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Decision-making in state lotteries: half now or all of it later?

Authors:  Forest Baker; Matthew W Johnson; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1994

5.  Variation, repetition, and choice.

Authors:  Josele Abreu-Rodrigues; Kennon A Lattal; Cristiano V dos Santos; Ricardo A Matos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Labor supply and consumption of food in a closed economy under a range of fixed- and random-ratio schedules: tests of unit price.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Jamie M Dake; Ellie C Mauel; Ryan R Rowe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of reinforcer probability, delay, and response requirements on the choices of rats and pigeons: possible species differences.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Delay and number of food reinforcers: Effects on choice and latencies.

Authors:  R L Shull; R C Mellon; J A Sharp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Conditioned reinforcement: Neglected or outmoded explanatory construct?

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

10.  Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.

Authors:  James E Mazur; Dawn R Biondi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.