Literature DB >> 4067510

Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.

J E Mazur, M Snyderman, D Coe.   

Abstract

An adjusting procedure was used to measure pigeons' preferences among alternatives that differed in the duration of a delay before reinforcement and of an intertrial interval (ITI) after reinforcement. In most conditions, a peck at a red key led to a fixed delay, followed by reinforcement, a fixed ITI, and then the beginning of the next trial. A peck at a green key led to an adjustable delay, reinforcement, and then the next trial began without an ITI. The purpose of the adjusting delay was to estimate an indifference point, or a delay that made a subject approximately indifferent between the two alternatives. As the ITI for the red key increased from 0 s to 60 s, the green-key delay at the indifference point increased systematically but only slightly. The fact that there was some increase showed that pigeons' choices were controlled by more than simply the delay to the next reinforcer. One interpretation of these results is that besides delay of reinforcement, rate of reinforcement also influenced choice. However, an analysis that ignored reinforcement rate, but considered the delays between a choice response and the reinforcers on subsequent trials, was able to account for most of the obtained increases in green-key delays. It was concluded that in this type of discrete-trial situation, rate of reinforcement exerts little control over choice behavior, and perhaps none at all.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4067510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  24 in total

1.  Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur; A Romano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of pre-trial response requirements on self-control choices by rats and pigeons.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of reinforcer delays on choice as a function of income level.

Authors:  T Hastjarjo; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Delay of reinforcers in a concurrent-chain schedule: An extension of the hyperbolic-decay model.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Maximizing present value: A model to explain why moderate response rates obtain on variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  A Silberberg; F R Warren-Boulton; T Asano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response-dependent prechoice effects on foraging-related choice.

Authors:  W A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice.

Authors:  R C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice between single and multiple reinforcers in concurrent-chains schedules.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Rats value time differently on equivalent foraging and delay-discounting tasks.

Authors:  Evan C Carter; A David Redish
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-06-30

10.  Self-control in male and female rats.

Authors:  F Van Haaren; A Van Hest; N E Van De Poll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.