Literature DB >> 3660667

Psychophysics of reading--V. The role of contrast in normal vision.

G E Legge1, G S Rubin, A Luebker.   

Abstract

How does contrast affect reading rate? What is the role of contrast sensitivity? We measured reading rate as a function of the contrast and character size of text for subjects with normal vision. Reading rates were highest (about 350 words/min) for letters ranging in size from 0.25 degree to 2 degrees. Within this range, reading was very tolerant to contrast reduction--for 1 degree letters, reading rate decreased by less than a factor of two for a tenfold reduction in contrast. The results were very similar for white-on-black and black-on-white text. Reading rate declined more rapidly for very small (less than 0.25 degree) and very large (greater than 2 degrees) letters. People with low vision usually require large characters to read, so high contrast is particularly important for them. Taking 35 words/min to be a threshold for reading, we constructed a contrast-sensitivity function (CSF) for reading. We were able to relate the shape of this CSF to the shape of sine-wave grating CSFs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3660667     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90028-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  38 in total

1.  Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Frank Thorn; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Patching; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

3.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Sing-Hang Cheung; Deyue Yu; Susana T L Chung; Hye-Won Lee; Daniel P Owens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Image jitter enhances visual performance when spatial resolution is impaired.

Authors:  Lynne M Watson; Niall C Strang; Fraser Scobie; Gordon D Love; Dirk Seidel; Velitchko Manahilov
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Comparison of reading speed with 3 different log-scaled reading charts.

Authors:  Noor Halilah Buari; Ai-Hong Chen; Nuraini Musa
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-01-28

6.  Higher-contrast requirements for recognizing low-pass-filtered letters.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Tablet and Smartphone Accessibility Features in the Low Vision Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Danielle Irvine; Alex Zemke; Gregg Pusateri; Leah Gerlach; Rob Chun; Walter M Jay
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2014-03-11

8.  The effect of letter-stroke boldness on reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Bernard; Girish Kumar; Jasmine Junge; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of reading in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Factors affecting crowded acuity: eccentricity and contrast.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Jeremy M Chin; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.