Literature DB >> 8943993

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a community-based enriched model prenatal intervention project in the District of Columbia.

A A Herman1, H W Berendes, K F Yu, L C Cooper, M D Overpeck, G Rhoads, J P Maxwell, B A Kinney, P A Koslowe, D L Coates.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an enriched prenatal intervention program designed to reduce the risk of low birth weight. STUDY
SETTING: Freestanding community-based prenatal intervention project located in a poor inner-city community, serving mostly African American women. STUDY
DESIGN: All women less than 29 weeks pregnant were eligible to participate. They were compared to women who lived in neighborhoods with similar rates of poverty. DATA COLLECTION: The birth certificate was the source of data on maternal age, education, marital status, timing and frequency of prenatal care attendance, parity, gravidity, prior pregnancy terminations, fetal and child deaths, and birth weight. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Thirty-eight percent of the women who delivered live-born infants in the study area participated in the program. There were no differences in low- and very low birthweight rates in the study and comparison groups. In a secondary analysis comparing participants and nonparticipants in the study census tracts, participants were at higher risk for low and very low birth weight, and they adhered more closely to the schedule of prenatal visits than nonparticipants. Low- and very low birthweight rates were lower among participants than among nonparticipants and comparison women.
CONCLUSION: The Better Babies Project did not have an effect on the overall low- and very low birthweight rates in the study census tracts. This was probably due to the low participation rates and the high population mobility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8943993      PMCID: PMC1070144     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  11 in total

1.  The dramatic increase in the rate of low birthweight in New York City: an aggregate time-series analysis.

Authors:  T Joyce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in an HMO and general population: a multivariate cohort analysis.

Authors:  J D Quick; M R Greenlick; K J Roghmann
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The effects of prenatal care upon the health of the newborn.

Authors:  S L Gortmaker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Evaluation of the effects of the North Carolina Improved Pregnancy Outcome Project: implications for state-level decision-making.

Authors:  M D Peoples; R C Grimson; G L Daughtry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Regional program for prevention of premature birth in northwestern North Carolina.

Authors:  P J Meis; J M Ernest; M L Moore; R Michielutte; P C Sharp; P A Buescher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The impact of the Mississippi Improved Child Health Project on prenatal care and low birthweight.

Authors:  D M Strobino; G A Chase; Y J Kim; B E Crawley; J H Salim; G Baruffi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The perinatal and economic impact of prenatal care in a low-socioeconomic population.

Authors:  T R Moore; W Origel; T C Key; R Resnik
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  High-risk young mothers: infant mortality and morbidity in four areas in the United States, 1973-1978.

Authors:  M C McCormick; S Shapiro; B Starfield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Measuring the impact of programs for mothers and infants on prenatal care and low birth weight: the value of refined analyses.

Authors:  M D Peoples; E Siegel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  5 in total

1.  The influence of proximity of prenatal services on small-for-gestational-age birth.

Authors:  Katherine E Heck; Kenneth C Schoendorf; Gilberto F Chavez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2002-02

2.  The impact on clients of a community-based infant mortality reduction program: the National Healthy Start Program Survey of Postpartum Women.

Authors:  M C McCormick; L W Deal; B L Devaney; D Chu; L Moreno; K T Raykovich
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Medicaid and preterm birth and low birth weight: the last two decades.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Anum; Sheldon M Retchin; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Receipt of recommended prenatal interventions and birth weight among African-American women: analysis of data from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey.

Authors:  M T Covington; R J Rice
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1997-09

5.  Lower rates of low birthweight and preterm births in the California Black Infant Health Program.

Authors:  Winnie O Willis; Clara H Eder; Suzanne P Lindsay; Gilberto Chavez; Shirley T Shelton
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.798

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.