Literature DB >> 11605724

A preterm birth prevention project in Nova Scotia, Canada.

B A Armson1, L Dodds, C Cervin, S Christie-Haliburton, K Rinaldo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Halifax County Preterm Birth Prevention Project was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a population-based preterm birth (PTB) prevention program in Nova Scotia from January 1995 through June 1997 (n = 10,326).
METHODS: Preterm birth rates, adjusted for risk status and maternal age, were evaluated over time in Halifax County and compared to non-Halifax County parturients in Nova Scotia. Physician participation was evaluated by means of a mailed survey.
RESULTS: There was no appreciable change in the overall (<37 weeks) or early (<34 weeks) PTB rates within or outside Halifax County during the intervention period compared to the preintervention period. Although not significant, the very (<30 weeks) PTB rate in Halifax County decreased by 40% from 0.53 to 0.32%, while outside Halifax County it remained stable (0.43-0.42%). There was a statistically significant decrease in early and very PTB associated with spontaneous labour, as well as an apparent shift in the timing of delivery from very preterm to preterm (> or =30 weeks). Participation among responding physicians was greater for high-risk than low-risk women, but full compliance with project recommendations was low.
CONCLUSION: The overall ineffectiveness of the Halifax County Preterm Birth Prevention Project may reflect the reluctance of practitioners to fully incorporate the recommended prevention strategies into their practice. However, such interventions may reduce the risk of spontaneous early preterm birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11605724     DOI: 10.1023/a:1011300102132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  27 in total

1.  Education of women about the prevention of preterm birth.

Authors:  B L Davies; P J Stewart; A E Sprague; P A Niday; C A Nimrod; C S Dulberg
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

2.  Preterm birth prevention in a rural practice.

Authors:  B P Yawn; R A Yawn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A randomized trial of nurse intervention to reduce preterm and low birth weight births.

Authors:  M L Moore; P J Meis; J M Ernest; H B Wells; D J Zaccaro; T Terrell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Pathogenesis of preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of membranes associated with intraamniotic infection.

Authors:  R Gomez; R Romero; S S Edwin; C David
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.982

5.  Maternal demographic characteristics and rates of low birth weight in Canada, 1961 to 1990.

Authors:  E Ng; R Wilkins
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.796

6.  The West Los Angeles Preterm Birth Prevention Project. I. Program impact on high-risk women.

Authors:  C J Hobel; M G Ross; R L Bemis; J R Bragonier; S Nessim; M Sandhu; M B Bear; B Mori
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Do tocolytic agents stop preterm labor? A critical and comprehensive review of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  K Higby; E M Xenakis; C J Pauerstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Regional program for prevention of premature birth in northwestern North Carolina.

Authors:  P J Meis; J M Ernest; M L Moore; R Michielutte; P C Sharp; P A Buescher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Prematurity prevention programs: an analysis of successes and failures.

Authors:  J J Fangman; P M Mark; L Pratt; K K Conway; M L Healey; J W Oswald; D L Uden
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  A multicenter randomized controlled trial of home uterine monitoring: active versus sham device. The Collaborative Home Uterine Monitoring Study (CHUMS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Community-based, population-focused preterm birth prevention programs - a review.

Authors:  Dana Vitner; Jon Barrett; Wendy Katherine; Scott W White; John P Newnham
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Effects of socioeconomic position and clinical risk factors on spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth.

Authors:  K S Joseph; John Fahey; Ketan Shankardass; Victoria M Allen; Patricia O'Campo; Linda Dodds; Robert M Liston; Alexander C Allen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.