| Literature DB >> 36235609 |
Luise V Marino1,2,3, Simone Paulson1, James J Ashton3,4,5, Charlotte Weeks1, Aneurin Young3,5,6, John V Pappachan1,7, Jonathan Swann8, Mark J Johnson3,6,7, Robert Mark Beattie3,4,5.
Abstract
Background: Growth failure in infants born preterm is a significant issue, increasing the risk of poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes and metabolic syndrome later in life. During the first 1000 days of life biological systems mature rapidly involving developmental programming, cellular senescence, and metabolic maturation, regulating normal growth and development. However, little is known about metabolic maturation in infants born preterm and the relationship with growth. Objective: To examine the available evidence on urinary markers of metabolic maturation and their relationship with growth in infants born preterm. Eligibility criteria: Studies including in this scoping review using qualitative or quantitative methods to describe urinary markers of metabolic maturation and the relationship with growth in infants born preterm.Entities:
Keywords: growth; infants; metabolic maturation; preterm; urinary metabolites
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235609 PMCID: PMC9571892 DOI: 10.3390/nu14193957
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist.
| Section | Item | PRISMA-ScR Checklist Item | Reported on Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | |||
| Title | 1 | Identify the report as a scoping review. | 1 |
|
| |||
| Structured summary | 2 | Provide a structured summary that includes (as applicable): background, objectives, eligibility criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods, results, and conclusions that relate to the review questions and objectives. | 1 |
|
| |||
| Rationale | 3 | Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Explain why the review questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping review approach. | 3 |
| Objectives | 4 | Provide an explicit statement of the questions and objectives being addressed with reference to their key elements (e.g., population or participants, concepts, and context) or other relevant key elements used to conceptualize the review questions and/or objectives. | 3 |
|
| |||
| Protocol and registration | 5 | Indicate whether a review protocol exists; state if and where it can be accessed (e.g., a Web address); and if available, provide registration information, including the registration number. | 4 |
| Eligibility criteria | 6 | Specify characteristics of the sources of evidence used as eligibility criteria (e.g., years considered, language, and publication status), and provide a rationale. | 4 |
| Information sources * | 7 | Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases with dates of coverage and contact with authors to identify additional sources), as well as the date the most recent search was executed. | 4 |
| Search | 8 | Present the full electronic search strategy for at least 1 database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated. | 4 |
| Selection of sources of evidence † | 9 | State the process for selecting sources of evidence (i.e., screening and eligibility) included in the scoping review. | 4 |
| Data charting process ‡ | 10 | Describe the methods of charting data from the included sources of evidence (e.g., calibrated forms or forms that have been tested by the team before their use, and whether data charting was done independently or in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators. | 4 |
| Data items | 11 | List and define all variables for which data were sought and any assumptions and simplifications made. | 4 |
| Critical appraisal of individual sources of evidence § | 12 | If done, provide a rationale for conducting a critical appraisal of included sources of evidence; describe the methods used and how this information was used in any data synthesis (if appropriate). | 4 |
| Synthesis of results | 13 | Describe the methods of handling and summarizing the data that were charted. | 4 |
|
| |||
| Selection of sources of evidence | 14 | Give numbers of sources of evidence screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally using a flow diagram. | 6 |
| Characteristics of sources of evidence | 15 | For each source of evidence, present characteristics for which data were charted and provide the citations. | 7 |
| Critical appraisal within sources of evidence | 16 | If done, present data on critical appraisal of included sources of evidence (see item 12). | 7 |
| Results of individual sources of evidence | 17 | For each included source of evidence, present the relevant data that were charted that relate to the review questions and objectives. | 7 |
| Synthesis of results | 18 | Summarize and/or present the charting results as they relate to the review questions and objectives. | 7 |
|
| |||
| Summary of evidence | 19 | Summarize the main results (including an overview of concepts, themes, and types of evidence available), link to the review questions and objectives, and consider the relevance to key groups. | 26 |
| Limitations | 20 | Discuss the limitations of the scoping review process. | 30 |
| Conclusions | 21 | Provide a general interpretation of the results with respect to the review questions and objectives, as well as potential implications and/or next steps. | 31 |
|
| |||
| Funding | 22 | Describe sources of funding for the included sources of evidence, as well as sources of funding for the scoping review. Describe the role of the funders of the scoping review. | 31 |
JBI = Joanna Briggs Institute; PRISMA-ScR = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. * Where sources of evidence are compiled from, such as bibliographic databases, social media platforms, and Web sites. † A more inclusive/heterogeneous term used to account for the different types of evidence or data sources (e.g., quantitative and/or qualitative research, expert opinion, and policy documents) that may be eligible in a scoping review as opposed to only studies. This is not to be confused with information sources. ‡ The frameworks by Arksey and O’Malley (6) and Levac and colleagues (7) and the JBI guidance (4, 5) refer to the process of data extraction in a scoping review as data charting. § The process of systematically examining research evidence to assess its validity, results, and relevance before using it to inform a decision. This term is used for items 12 and 19 instead of “risk of bias” (which is more applicable to systematic reviews of interventions) to include and acknowledge the various sources of evidence that may be used in a scoping review (e.g., quantitative and/or qualitative research, expert opinion, and policy document).
Search strategy for PuBMed and study inclusion criteria to do.
| Study Selection Criteria (PICOTS) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria | |
|
|
Preterm infants < 37 weeks gestational age |
Infants > 37 weeks gestation age; Exclusion criteria included studies not published in English, infants with other primary pathologies (including metabolic, gastrointestinal, nephrological, neurological or urological) and metabolites described in fluids other than urine |
|
|
Mass spectroscopy urinary metabolomics |
Mass spectroscopy metabolomics from other biological samples |
|
|
Term neonates |
Infants with other primary pathologies (including metabolic, gastrointestinal, nephrological, neurological or urological) |
|
|
Growth |
Growth not reported |
|
|
Infants < 37 weeks gestational age |
Infants > 37 weeks gestational age, or those with other primary pathology |
|
|
Hospital |
Community |
|
| ||
|
|
Infants or neonates; Preterm or premature or prematurity; Urinary metabolomics or urinary metabolites; Growth or weight gain; Metabolic maturation or metabolic maturity | |
|
|
English, human | |
|
|
Up to February 2022 | |
|
|
((Infants or Neonates) AND (Urinary metabolomics or urinary metabolites)) AND (weight or growth) | |
|
| (“infant, premature”[MeSH Terms] OR (“infant”[All Fields] AND “premature”[All Fields]) OR “premature infant”[All Fields] OR (“preterm”[All Fields] AND “infants”[All Fields]) OR “preterm infants”[All Fields] OR (“infant, premature”[MeSH Terms] OR (“infant”[All Fields] AND “premature”[All Fields]) OR “premature infant”[All Fields] OR (“premature”[All Fields] AND “infants”[All Fields]) OR “premature infants”[All Fields])) AND (((“urinary tract”[MeSH Terms] OR (“urinary”[All Fields] AND “tract”[All Fields]) OR “urinary tract”[All Fields] OR “urinary”[All Fields]) AND (“metabolome”[MeSH Terms] OR “metabolome”[All Fields] OR “metabolomes”[All Fields] OR “metabolomics”[MeSH Terms] OR “metabolomics”[All Fields] OR “metabolomic”[All Fields])) OR ((“urinary tract”[MeSH Terms] OR (“urinary”[All Fields] AND “tract”[All Fields]) OR “urinary tract”[All Fields] OR “urinary”[All Fields]) AND (“metabolite”[All Fields] OR “metabolite s”[All Fields] OR “metabolites”[All Fields]))) AND (“growth and development”[MeSH Subheading] OR (“growth”[All Fields] AND “development”[All Fields]) OR “growth and development”[All Fields] OR “growth”[All Fields] OR “growth”[MeSH Terms] OR “growths”[All Fields] OR (“weight gain”[MeSH Terms] OR (“weight”[All Fields] AND “gain”[All Fields]) OR “weight gain”[All Fields])) AND (((“metabolic”[All Fields] OR “metabolical”[All Fields] OR “metabolically”[All Fields] OR “metabolics”[All Fields] OR “metabolism”[MeSH Terms] OR “metabolism”[All Fields] OR “metabolisms”[All Fields] OR “metabolism”[MeSH Subheading] OR “metabolic networks and pathways”[MeSH Terms] OR (“metabolic”[All Fields] AND “networks”[All Fields] AND “pathways”[All Fields]) OR “metabolic networks and pathways”[All Fields] OR “metabolities”[All Fields] OR “metabolization”[All Fields] OR “metabolize”[All Fields] OR “metabolized”[All Fields] OR “metabolizer”[All Fields] OR “metabolizers”[All Fields] OR “metabolizes”[All Fields] OR “metabolizing”[All Fields]) AND (“maturate”[All Fields] OR “maturated”[All Fields] OR “maturating”[All Fields] OR “maturation”[All Fields] OR “maturational”[All Fields] OR “maturations”[All Fields] OR “maturative”[All Fields] OR “mature”[All Fields] OR “matured”[All Fields] OR “maturer”[All Fields] OR “maturers”[All Fields] OR “matures”[All Fields] OR “maturing”[All Fields] OR “maturities”[All Fields] OR “maturity”[All Fields])) OR ((“metabolic”[All Fields] OR “metabolical”[All Fields] OR “metabolically”[All Fields] OR “metabolics”[All Fields] OR “metabolism”[MeSH Terms] OR “metabolism”[All Fields] OR “metabolisms”[All Fields] OR “metabolism”[MeSH Subheading] OR “metabolic networks and pathways”[MeSH Terms] OR (“metabolic”[All Fields] AND “networks”[All Fields] AND “pathways”[All Fields]) OR “metabolic networks and pathways”[All Fields] OR “metabolities”[All Fields] OR “metabolization”[All Fields] OR “metabolize”[All Fields] OR “metabolized”[All Fields] OR “metabolizer”[All Fields] OR “metabolizers”[All Fields] OR “metabolizes”[All Fields] OR “metabolizing”[All Fields]) AND (“maturate”[All Fields] OR “maturated”[All Fields] OR “maturating”[All Fields] OR “maturation”[All Fields] OR “maturational”[All Fields] OR “maturations”[All Fields] OR “maturative”[All Fields] OR “mature”[All Fields] OR “matured”[All Fields] OR “maturer”[All Fields] OR “maturers”[All Fields] OR “matures”[All Fields] OR “maturing”[All Fields] OR “maturities”[All Fields] OR “maturity”[All Fields])))Translations preterm infants: “infant, premature”[MeSH Terms] OR (“infant”[All Fields] AND “premature”[All Fields]) OR “premature infant”[All Fields] OR (“preterm”[All Fields] AND “infants”[All Fields]) OR “preterm infants”[All Fields]premature infants: “infant, premature”[MeSH Terms] OR (“infant”[All Fields] AND “premature”[All Fields]) OR “premature infant”[All Fields] OR (“premature”[All Fields] AND “infants”[All Fields]) OR “premature infants”[All Fields]Urinary: “urinary tract”[MeSH Terms] OR (“urinary”[All Fields] AND “tract”[All Fields]) OR “urinary tract”[All Fields] OR “urinary”[All Fields]metabolomics: “metabolome”[MeSH Terms] OR “metabolome”[All Fields] OR “metabolomes”[All Fields] OR “metabolomics”[MeSH Terms] OR “metabolomics”[All Fields] OR “metabolomic”[All Fields]urinary: “urinary tract”[MeSH Terms] OR (“urinary”[All Fields] AND “tract”[All Fields]) OR “urinary tract”[All Fields] OR “urinary”[All Fields]metabolites: “metabolite”[All Fields] OR “metabolite’s”[All Fields] OR “metabolites”[All Fields]Growth: “growth and development”[Subheading] OR (“growth”[All Fields] AND “development”[All Fields]) OR “growth and development”[All Fields] OR “growth”[All Fields] OR “growth”[MeSH Terms] OR “growths”[All Fields]weight gain: “weight gain”[MeSH Terms] OR (“weight”[All Fields] AND “gain”[All Fields]) OR “weight gain”[All Fields]Metabolic: “metabolic”[All Fields] OR “metabolical”[All Fields] OR “metabolically”[All Fields] OR “metabolics”[All Fields] OR “metabolism”[MeSH Terms] OR “metabolism”[All Fields] OR “metabolisms”[All Fields] OR “metabolism”[Subheading] OR “metabolic networks and pathways”[MeSH Terms] OR (“metabolic”[All Fields] AND “networks”[All Fields] AND “pathways”[All Fields]) OR “metabolic networks and pathways”[All Fields] OR “metabolities”[All Fields] OR “metabolization”[All Fields] OR “metabolize”[All Fields] OR “metabolized”[All Fields] OR “metabolizer”[All Fields] OR “metabolizers”[All Fields] OR “metabolizes”[All Fields] OR “metabolizing”[All Fields] maturation: “maturate”[All Fields] OR “maturated”[All Fields] OR “maturating”[All Fields] OR “maturation”[All Fields] OR “maturational”[All Fields] OR “maturations”[All Fields] OR “maturative”[All Fields] OR “mature”[All Fields] OR “matured”[All Fields] OR “maturer”[All Fields] OR “maturers”[All Fields] OR “matures”[All Fields] OR “maturing”[All Fields] OR “maturities”[All Fields] OR “maturity”[All Fields]metabolic: “metabolic”[All Fields] OR “metabolical”[All Fields] OR “metabolically”[All Fields] OR “metabolics”[All Fields] OR “metabolism”[MeSH Terms] OR “metabolism”[All Fields] OR “metabolisms”[All Fields] OR “metabolism”[Subheading] OR “metabolic networks and pathways”[MeSH Terms] OR (“metabolic”[All Fields] AND “networks”[All Fields] AND “pathways”[All Fields]) OR “metabolic networks and pathways”[All Fields] OR “metabolities”[All Fields] OR “metabolization”[All Fields] OR “metabolize”[All Fields] OR “metabolized”[All Fields] OR “metabolizer”[All Fields] OR “metabolizers”[All Fields] OR “metabolizes”[All Fields] OR “metabolizing”[All Fields] maturity: “maturate”[All Fields] OR “maturated”[All Fields] OR “maturating”[All Fields] OR “maturation”[All Fields] OR “maturational”[All Fields] OR “maturations”[All Fields] OR “maturative”[All Fields] OR “mature”[All Fields] OR “matured”[All Fields] OR “maturer”[All Fields] OR “maturers”[All Fields] OR “matures”[All Fields] OR “maturing”[All Fields] OR “maturities”[All Fields] OR “maturity”[All Fields] | |
Figure 1Prisma flow chart of studies included in the scoping review.
Studies describing urinary metabolites in preterm infants [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48].
| Title | Author, Year, Published | Methodology | Study Numbers | Patient Characteristics & Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion | Study Aim/Method | Main Findings | Over Arching Theme |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Methylhistidine/creatinine ratio in urine from low-birth-weight infants: Statistical analysis | Hulsemann et al., 1988 [ | Observational cohort, single centre | 30 (23 preterm + 7 term SGA) | Preterm infants (GA 30–36 weeks, age: 9–83 days postpartum) Term SGA infants (2–30 days postpartum) | Infants with major clinical problems (undefined), any infant cared for in the intensive care ward | To assess if the urinary 3-methylhistidine/creatinine ratio is constant over 24 h, as well a statistical analysis of the observed variability in this ratio among different children and in the same child on different days. | 1. Diurnal variation of the 3-methylhistidine/creatinine ratio is negligible in any given individual 2. Variability is found as a function of the day of sampling-hypothesised to be due to the corresponding current metabolic state of the individual 3. Infants with stagnating or decreasing weight had higher 3-methylhistidine/creatinine ratios and so this can potentially be used to assess current metabolic state in low-birth-weight infants. | 4 |
| Metabolic changes in early neonatal life: NMR analysis of the neonatal metabolic profile to monitor postnatal metabolic adaptations | Georgakopoulou et al., 2020 [ | Observational cohort, 2 centre | 153 (141 term 12 late preterm) | Term infants (GA 37–40 weeks) Late preterm (GA 35–37 weeks) | Nil specifically mentioned | H NMR spectroscopy was used to compare the metabolic urinary profiles from the first and third days of life, assessing the impact of; delivery mode, prematurity, maternal smoking, gender, nutrition, and neonatal jaundice. | 1. From day 1 to day 3 multiple changes are noted in the urinary metabolic profiles of healthy term infants. Specifically stronger signals of creatinine, taurine, myo-inositol and weaker signals of creatine and glycine are seen on the first day of life when compared to the third day of life. 2. Trends in differentiation of metabolite levels between late preterm and term infants and observed at day 1 but lost by day 3. 3. There are specific differences between the urinary metabolic profiles of male and female infants, as well of those whose mothers who smoked during pregnancy. | 1, 2 |
| H1 NMR-based metabolomic analysis of urine from preterm and term neonates | Atzori et al. [ | Observational cohort, 2 centre | 67 (26 term + 41 preterm infants) | Term infants (GA 37–40 weeks) Preterm infants (GA < 37 weeks) | Nil specifically mentioned | H1 NMR spectroscopy was used to analyse the urinary metabolic profiles of term and preterm infants, from samples collected within the first 12 h of life, to identify any gestational age-related differences. | 1. The urinary H1 NMR profile of premature neonates is different to that of full-term neonates. 2. Profiles also vary between different groups of preterm infants. (Those born at 23–32 weeks compared to those of 33–36 weeks GA). 3. Individual metabolites discriminating between the groups were: Hippurate, tryptophan, phenylalanine, malate, tyrosine, hydroxybutyrate, | 2 |
| Urinary metabolite profiles in premature infants show early postnatal metabolic adaptation and maturation. | Moltu et al. [ | Randomised control Trial, 2 centre | 50 (24 intervention, 26 control) | Preterm infants with birth weight (BW) < 1500 g: Intervention: GA 28.1 weeks (25.0–33.6) BW 940 g (460–1311) Control: GA 28.5 weeks (24.0–32.6) BW 1083 g (571–1414) (mean, range) | Congenital malformations, chromosomal abnormalities, critical illnesses with short life expectancy, clinical syndromes known to affect growth and development | To use H NMR spectroscopy to assess the urinary metabolic profile of premature infants randomised to either a standard or an enhanced diet. | 1. Enhanced nutrition did not appear to affect the urinary metabolic profiles greater than individual variation. 2. Infants given enhanced nutrition show greater growth velocity, but no changes in their urinary metabolic profile. 3. In all infants the glucogenic amino acids glycine, threonine, hydroxyproline and tyrosine, as well as the metabolites of the TCA (succinate, oxoglutarate, fumarate and citrate) increased during the early postnatal period. 4. The metabolite changes correlated with gestational age at birth and chronological age. 5. Threonine and glycine levels were elevated in first-week urine samples of the small for gestational age infants compared to appropriate for gestational age infants. 6.Neither sex nor the presence of infections had a significant effect on metabolic profile. | 1, 3, 4 |
| Comprehensive analysis of the | Buck et al. [ | Observational cohort, single centre, healthy preterm infants | 106 | 51 male infants and 55 female infants, GA 23 + 6–36 + 1 weeks, Group 1: | Infection, sepsis, intraventricular haemorrhage > 2°, congenital disorders and/or chromosomal aberrations, pulmonary hypertension, mandatory ventilation, and infant respiratory distress syndrome > 3° | To investigate and describe the Arg/hArg/NO pathway in healthy preterm infants. | All enterally fed with formula or a combination of breast/formula milk. 10 had additional PN | 2 |
| Metabolic products in urine of preterm infants characterized via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry | Hao et al. [ | Observational case–control, single centre | 92 (45 term + 47 preterm) | Term infants: GA 37–41 weeks Preterm infants: GA 28–36 weeks Note: All infants were formula fed from the 3rd postnatal hour | Foetal distress, birth asphyxia, neonatal complications within the first 6 postnatal hours, APGAR score < 8, abnormal blood gas or lactate, requirement for medical treatment. Maternal medical history of chronic or infectious disease, malnutrition, smoking, alcohol, or drug use. | To characterise the metabolic products of urine associated with preterm birth using gas chromatography on samples obtained within the first 24 h of life. Specifically, the levels of urinary lysine, phenylalanine, histidine, ornithine, fumaric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, lactose, stearic acid, and 4-hydro phenylacetic acid in the urine of preterm infants was compared to that of term. | 1. Normalized concentrations of all measured metabolites were significantly lower in preterm infants when compared to full-term infants, some were undetectable. (Lysine, phenylalanine, | 2 |
| Human milk enhances antioxidant defences against hydroxyl radical aggression in preterm infants | Ledo et al. [ | Observational case–control, single centre | 83 (Human milk | Human milk: GA 32 weeks (26, 36) Formula: GA 33 weeks (29, 36) (GA median (95% CI) | Acute perinatal or chronic postnatal disease: currently on supplemental oxygen, medications, mineral, or vitamin supplementation, blood transfusion in the 2 weeks prior to enrolment, severe congenital abnormality, chromosomal abnormality, required GI surgery, required PN | To determine the effect of human milk on markers of oxidative stress. | 1. Preterm: GA < 37 weeks, Full enteral feeding either exclusively with human milk (own mother’s milk or donor) or with preterm formula, consistent and adequate weight gain the week before enrolment; Controls: healthy, term, fed human milk 2. Both preterm groups, when compared with term new-borns, had significantly higher urinary markers of oxidative stress. 3. The formula fed preterm infants eliminated significantly higher amounts of 8-oxodG and o-Tyr than the preterm infants fed human milk, leading to the conclusion that prematurity is associated with protracted oxidative stress, from which human milk is partially protective 4. When all the data was combined there was a significant correlation between markers of oxidative stress and birth weight. | 2, 3, 4 |
| Comparison between tryptophan methoxy indole and kynurenine metabolic pathways in normal and preterm neonates and in neonates with acute foetal distress | Munoz-Hoyas [ | Observational cohort, single centre | Total 112: 42 control, 30 preterm, 40 foetal distress | Preterm: < 37 weeks GA, Term infants suffering from foetal distress, Healthy term controls Mothers had one or more of; high risk pregnancy, obstetric antecedents or pregnancy diseases | Neurological or endocrine pathology | To analyse the kynurenine and methoxy indole metabolic pathways of tryptophan to identify changes in premature neonates and in neonates suffering from foetal distress. | 1. Diurnal differences exist cord in blood melatonin concentration and the urinary excretion of kynurenine- with greater concentrations of Kynurenine in the day and greater concentrations of Melatonin at night. This diurnal pattern is blunted in preterm infants and those with foetal distress. | 2 |
| Choline-related metabolites influenced by feeding patterns in preterm and term infants | Shoji et al. [ | Observational cohort, single centre | 39 (13 term breast fed, 6 term formula fed, 11 preterm breastfed, 9 preterm mixed feeding) | Term Breast: GA 39.2 ± 1.2 weeks BW 2962.8 ± 296.9 g | Term: Perinatal complications including asphyxia, infection, bleeding, Preterm: Major congenital abnormalities, metabolic disorders, maternal diabetes requiring insulin, chronic hypertension, or intrauterine infection | To examine the choline status of term and preterm infants using analysis of urinary excretion of choline metabolites. (Choline, | 1. Type of feeding affects choline metabolism 2. Urinary excretion of choline metabolites (Choline, | 3 |
| Suppressive effects of breast milk on oxidative DNA damage in very low birthweight infants | Shoji 2003 et al. [ | Observational case control, single centre, | 29 (15 breast fed, 14 formula fed) | Breast fed: 8 male 7 female, mean GA 29.2 weeks SD 2.3, mean BW 1231 g, SD 298 Formula fed: 8 male 6 female, mean GA 28.7 weeks SD 2.0, mean BW 1182 g SD 281 | Congenital abnormalities | To examine the antioxidant effects of breast milk in very low birth weight infants | 1. 8-OHdG is known to be a marker for in vivo oxidative DNA damage. 2. Urinary 8-OHdG excretion at 14 and 28 days of age is significantly lower than that at 2 and 7 days of age in breast fed infants. 3. Urinary 8-OHdG excretion is also lower at days 14 and 28 in breast fed infants when compared to formula fed infants. 4. In formula fed infants there is no significant difference in urinary 8-OHdG excretion at 2, 7, 14, and 28 days of age. Conclusion: Evidence of the antioxidant effect of human milk in very low birth weight infants. | 3 |
| New-born Urinary Metabolic Signatures of Prematurity and Other Disorders: A Case Control Study | Diaz et al. [ | Observationalcase control, single centre | 148: (46 Controls, 102 with specific disorders as listed: (1) late preterm = 17, (2) Respiratory depression = 10, (3) LGA = 18, (4) Congenital malformation = 9 (5) PROM = 33 and (6) Jaundice = 12.) | Healthy Controls + New-borns with specific disorders as follows: Late Preterm infants (GA 33–36 weeks) Infants with respiratory depression following delivery, LGA, congenital malformations, PROM, jaundice | Nil specifically mentioned | To assess, by H NMR spectroscopy, the urinary metabolic signature of prematurity whilst also examining potential confounders and signature specificity by comparing with the metabolic signatures of other disorders. | 1. Overall the metabolic signature of prematurity was comprised of changes in 25 identified, and several more unassigned, metabolites. Those identified suggest disturbances in nucleotide metabolism, lung surfactants biosynthesis and renal function, along with enhancement of TCA cycle activity, fatty acids oxidation, and oxidative stress. 2. Gender and mode of delivery impact urinary metabolic profile. 3. Profile changes were also noted for new-borns experiencing respiratory depression, LGA and malformations but these were distinct from the changes of prematurity. | 2, 4 |
| Urinary metabolites of oxidative stress and nitric oxide in preterm and term infants | Farkouh et al. [ | Observational cohort, 2 centre study | 102 (82 preterm 20 term) | Preterm: GA 27.4 ± 2.6 weeks BW 1048 ± 407 g Term: GA 38.4 ± 1.6 weeks BW 3210 ± 4467 g (mean ± SD) | All: Major congenital abnormality, chromosomal anomaly, received iNO or multivitamin supplementation, Term controls: SGA, requiring medical support | To determine the effects of clinical interventions in preterm infants on markers of oxidative stress and nitric oxide metabolism. The substrate markers measured were levels of urinary peroxides and nitrates/nitrites, respectively. | 1. Premature infants had significantly higher urinary peroxide levels than term infants. Urinary nitrite/nitrate levels were not significantly different. 2. Infants receiving PN had significantly higher urinary peroxide levels than those not receiving PN. 3. Administration of Indomethacin resulted in lower nitrate and nitrite levels. 4. Receiving mechanical ventilation or high inhaled Fi02 did not affect either marker. | 2, 3 |
| Fatty acid profiles, antioxidant status, and growth of preterm infants fed diets without or with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids: a randomized clinical trial | Koletzko et al. [ | Double blind, randomised control trial | Total: 46 (29 formula fed-15 LCP supplemented formula, 14 low LCP formula, 17 breast fed controls) | Preterm, ‘stable’ clinical condition, BW < 1800 g Breast Fed Controls: GA 31 ± 2 weeks, BW 1440 ± 288 g, Supplemented formula: GA 30 ± 2 weeks, BW 1145 ± 288 g, Unsupplemented formula: GA 30 ± 3 weeks, BW 1177 ± 344 g. (mean ± SD) | Artificial ventilation, need for supplemental oxygen with Fi02 > 0.3, presence of apparent genetic, gastrointestinal, or metabolic disorders | To examine the effect of an infant formula enriched with | 1. Plasma long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid levels similar to those of breast fed infants can be achieved with a supplemented formula. 2. Urinary malondialdehyde excretion was significantly higher from formula fed infants than infants fed human milk. There was however no difference between the formula fed groups, suggesting there to be no adverse effects of the enriched formula with regard to oxidative stress. 3. No difference in growth was seen between the groups over the study period. | 3, 4 |
| Urinary metabolomic profile of preterm infants receiving human milk with either bovine or donkey milk-based fortifiers | Giribaldi et al. [ | Single blinded, randomised control trial | 54 (Bovine-Human milk = 27, Donkey-Human milk = 27) | GA < 32 weeks and/or BW ≤ 1500 g Bovine-Human milk: BW 1174 g (326), Donkey-Human milk: BW 1227 g (302) (mean g (SD)) | Severe gastrointestinal pathology, chromosomal abnormality, major congenital abnormality, metabolic disease, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, patent ductus arteriosus, renal failure | To analyse the urinary metabolome of infants fed human milk fortified with bovine and donkey milk-based fortifiers. The metabolic profiles were analysed at day 1 and day 21 of the intervention using H NMR spectroscopy. | 1. The urinary metabolic profiles of preterm and very low birth weight infants show postnatal adaptation. Changes common to all infants studied included: increasing urinary betaine, citrate, succinate, formate, alpha-ketoglutarate and | 1, 3 |
| Is the body composition development in premature infants associated with a distinctive nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomic profiling of urine? | Morniroli et al. [ | Observational cohort, single centre | 20 (13 preterm, 7 term) | GA ≤ 32 weeks, singleton pregnancy, exclusively formula fed Preterm: BW 1113.4 g (CI 956.8–1270) GA 29.7 (CI 28.6–30.8) Term: BW 3285 g (CI 2907–3663) GA 38.7 (CI 37.9–39.5) | Congenital malformations, chromosomal abnormalities, chronic lung disease, necrotizing enterocolitis, Papillae grade intraventricular haemorrhage > 2 or any renal, endocrine, or cardiac congenital disease | To compare the metabolomic profile of preterm infants at term and at 3 months with that of term infants, and to determine if there is any association with body composition development. | 1. At term-corrected age, fat mass, both in terms of percentage and absolute content, was significantly higher in preterm infants than in full-term infants. At 3 months corrected the body composition parameters were similar between the two groups. 2. There were significant differences in the urinary metabolic profiles of the two groups. At term corrected the preterm group exhibited higher urinary citrate, choline/phosphocholine, lactate, betaine, and glucose but lower myo-inositol, creatinine, dimethylamine, and ethanolamine. At 3 months corrected the preterm group exhibited higher urinary creatinine, choline/phosphocholine and lactate and a lower betaine, glycine, and citrate. | 1, 2, 4 |
Abbreviations: 8-OHdG = 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine; ADMA = asymmetric dimethylarginine, Arg = l-arginine, BW = birth weight, CI = confidence interval, Fi02 = fractional inspired oxygen, HArg = l-homoarginine; H1 NMR = Hydrogen nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy iNO = inspired nitric oxide, GA = gestational age, GI = gastrointestinal, LGA = large for gestational age; NO = nitric oxide, PN = parenteral nutrition, PROM = prolonged rupture of membranes, SGA = small for gestational age, SADMA = symmetric dimethylarginine TCA = tricarboxylic acid.
Content analysis of metabolite maturation in infants born preterm.
| Theme | Comparison | Key Findings | Associated Metabolic Pathways |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Preterm infants’ maturation over time |
Increasing glucogenic amino acids; glycine, threonine, hydroxyproline and tyrosine Increasing metabolites of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA); succinate, oxoglutarate, fumarate, alpha-ketoglutarate, citrate Increasing urinary choline metabolites; betaine, |
Succinate, oxoglutarate, fumarate, alpha-ketoglutarate, citrate are all part of the TCA cycle, (also known as Krebs or citric acid cycle). The TCA cycle is the main source of energy for cells. The TCA cycle is part of the larger glucose metabolism whereby glucose is oxidized to form pyruvate, which is then oxidized and enters the TCA cycle as acetyl-CoA. Gluconeogenic amino acids also enter the TCA cycle [ Choline is involved in several pathways associated with neurotransmitters and is important component of brain development and neurocognition. Choline is also oxidized in the mitochondria to betaine. The methyl groups of betaine are used to re-synthesize methionine from homocysteine, providing methionine for protein synthesis and transmethylation reactions [ |
| Term and later preterm infants from day 1 to day 3 of life |
Increasing creatine, glycine, betaine, alanine, galactose, formate, dimethylglycine, lysine and ethanolamine Lower taurine, myo-inositol, trigonelline, creatinine, hypoxanthine, |
Alanine, lysine and creatine are associated with amino acid and nitrogen metabolism. Biosynthesis of creatinine is associated with increase muscle mass in infants [ The inositol pathway is formed of eight inositol isomers, all of which are formed from the epimerisation of myo-inositol. Myo-inositol is involved in the intracellular transmission of insulin’s metabolic signal and is also important for the oxidative use of glucose and its storage as glycogen. Aberrance in myo-inositol is associated with insulin resistance [ | |
|
| Preterm infants’ vs. Term Infants |
Higher Lower ethanolamine Lower essential amino acids; lysine, phenylalanine, histidine, Lower amino acid metabolites; ornithine, methyl-histidine Lower carbohydrate metabolites; lactose Lower fatty acid metabolites; stearic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid Lower ketone bodies; acetone and 3-hydroxybutyrate Changes to TCA cycle intermediates; fumarate, malate, succinate, citrate Higher myo-inositol Higher 3-hydroxyisovalerate—A marker of reduced biotin status Higher markers of oxidative stress: urinary peroxide, oxidative bases of DNA and oxidative derivatives of Phenylalanine Blunted diurnal variation of tryptophan methoxyindole and kynurenine metabolic pathways in preterm infants Higher levels of L-homoarginine, asymmetric dimethyl-arginine (ADMA) and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) in preterm infants >30 weeks gestational age vs. <30 weeks gestational age Inconsistent results reported fumarate, succinate and lysine-reported to be lower by Hao et al. [ Higher urinary citrate, choline/phosphocholine, lactate, betaine and glucose in pre-term infants Lower myo-inositol, creatinine, dimethylamine and ethanolamine in pre-term infants Higher urinary creatinine, choline/phosphocholine and lactate in preterm infants Lower betaine, glycine and citrate in preterm infants |
TCA cycle metabolites fumarate, succinate, lysine Hao et al. [ Gluconeogenic amino acids glycine plays an important role in metabolic regulation, anti-oxidative reactions, and neurological function [ Metabolites associated with metabolism of carbohydrates, fatty acids and amino acids [ Lysine is the primary limiting amino acid for protein synthesis and has a significant role in calcium absorption, muscle mass accretion, alleviation of pain and inflammation [ Phenylalanine is a building block for protein and histidine is an essential amino acid in infants up to 6 months of age, inadequate consumption results in growth failure and increased loss of nitrogen [ Ornithine, fumaric acid and malic acid have important roles in amino acid metabolism and energy conservation [ Lower levels of amino acids in urine of preterm infants may be due to lower protein deposition of essential amino acids or lack of metabolic enzymes required for nutrient utilization [ Lower lactose levels may occur due to lower lactase enzyme activity in preterm infants intestinal tract with lower sugar metabolism and storage [ Lower ketone bodies and ketogenic amino acid lysine may be associated with deranged energy metabolism, as well as an increased reliance of fatty acids as a source of energy, with lower levels of lactate and potential enhanced use of pyruvate in the TCA cycle Lower metabolites related to the gut microbiome; dimethylamine (DMA) and 1-methyl-histidine and reduced biotin status [ ADMA and l-homoarginine are part of the nitric oxide pathway which is associated with many physiological processes including regulation of blood pressure, inhibition of platelet aggregation and neurotransmission [ Tryptophan metabolism in the brain involves the methoxyindole and kynurenine metabolic pathways, includes the metabolite melatonin, associated with circadian rhythm with tryptophan degradation occurring via methyoxyindoles [ The most important metabolic cycles related to variations in metabolites between preterm and term infants were; tyrosine metabolism (tyrosine and tryptophan); phenylalanine biosynthesis; TCA cycle; arginine and proline metabolism [ |
|
| Formula vs. Human milk |
8-oxodG, 8-OHdG, o-Tyr and urinary malondialdehyde (markers of oxidative stress) all higher in formula milk groups Choline metabolites higher in breast fed groups |
8-oxodG may be used as a measure of oxidative stress and oxidative damage [ Choline metabolism is associated with lung surfactant synthesis [ Urinary peroxides may be used as a measure of oxidative stress [ |
| Parenteral nutrition (PN) vs. Enteral feeding |
Higher urinary peroxides in PN group | ||
|
| Birth weight |
Markers of oxidative stress inversely correlate with birth weight |
Variation in ethanolamine and myo-inositol may also reflect changes in membrane synthesis of phosphatidylinositol (PI) which act as lung surfactants, as such decrease myo-inositol may reflect a temporary increase in PI requirements [ 3-methylhistidine is a constituent of actin and myosin of white muscle fibres. It is not reutilised for protein synthesis and can be used as a measure of muscle protein turnover. Creatinine is formed from creatine and creatine phosphatase in muscle and can be used as an indirect measure of lean muscle mass. Urinary 3-methylhistidine/creatinine ratio can be used as an indicator of nutritional and metabolic status. Infants with a higher ratio were more likely to have growth failure [ Increased urinary excretion of choline, a betaine precursor, could reflect a potential altered metabolism in preterm infants [ |
| Preterm vs. term infants |
At term corrected preterm infants have higher fat mass, urinary citrate, choline/phosphocholine, lactate, betaine and glucose but lower myo-inositol, creatinine, dimethylamine and ethanolamine | ||
| Preterm infants SGA |
Increased threonine and glycine levels in first week of life | ||
| Preterm infants with stagnating or decreasing weight |
Higher urinary 3-methylhistidine/creatinine ratios | ||
| Preterm infants vs. term infants |
Lower fat mass in preterm infants with increase in urinary choline/phosphocholine, betaine and glucose in preterm infants compared to term. |
Figure 2Graphical representation of the narrative synthesis and content analysis.
Figure 3Relationships with changes in metabolites over time and growth in preterm infants compared to healthy term infants. Abbreviations: ADP: adenosine triphosphate, 4-DTA: 4-deoxythreonic acid, 4-DTA: 4-deoxythreonic acid, 3-HBA: 3-hydroxybutyrate; IS: indoxyl sulfate; 3-Me-His: 3-methylhistidine; 1-Me-His: 1-methylhistidine.