| Literature DB >> 26914934 |
Chih-Yung Chiu1,2,3, Kuo-Wei Yeh2,3, Gigin Lin4, Meng-Han Chiang2, Shu-Chen Yang5, Wei-Ju Chao5, Tsung-Chieh Yao2,3, Ming-Han Tsai1,2, Man-Chin Hua1,2, Sui-Ling Liao1,2, Shen-Hao Lai2,3, Mei-Ling Cheng6, Jing-Long Huang2,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: A detailed understanding of the metabolic processes governing rapid growth in early life is still lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the age-related metabolic changes in healthy children throughout early childhood.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26914934 PMCID: PMC4767415 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Population characteristics and growth of 30 healthy children during a 4-year follow-up.
| Age | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Birth | 6 Months | 1 Years | 2 Years | 3 Years | 4 Years |
| Urine samples (n) | 21 | 23 | 20 | 18 | 23 | |
| Sex, male | 17 (57%) | |||||
| Maternal age (yr) | 32.4 ± 4.4 | |||||
| Gestational age (wk) | 37.7 ± 1.8 | |||||
| Breastfeeding until 6 mo | ||||||
| Exclusive | 13 (43%) | |||||
| Partial | 13 (43%) | |||||
| Formula | 4 (13%) | |||||
| Weight, kg (percentile) | 2.9 ± 0.5 (36.0 ± 26.9) | 7.7 ± 1.0 (50.8 ± 35.1) | 9.2 ± 1.1 (46.7 ± 28.1) | 12.1 ± 1.7 (54.3 ± 30.9) | 14.9 ± 1.9 (58.9 ± 30.0) | 16.4 ± 2.6 (50.8 ± 31.4) |
| Height, cm (percentile) | 48.2 ± 4.2 (56.1 ± 29.9) | 67.1 ± 3.1 (53.3 ± 33.3) | 74.9 ± 2.8 (50.1 ± 33.3) | 86.9 ± 4.0 (49.1 ± 30.1) | 95.4 ± 3.4 (40.6 ± 27.9) | 102.2 ± 4.6 (45.1 ± 32.5) |
| BMI, kg/m2 (percentile) | 12.8 ± 3.0 (33.7 ± 28.1) | 17.2 ± 1.3 (49.1 ± 29.1) | 16.3 ± 1.4 (44.5 ± 30.7) | 15.9 ± 2.0 (52.1 ± 34.9) | 16.3 ± 1.4 (68.8 ± 29.8) | 15.6 ± 2.0 (50.7 ± 32.2) |
yr, year; wk, week; mo, month; kg, kilograms; cm, centimeters; BMI, body mass index.
Data shown are mean ± SD or number (%) of subjects as appropriate. Percentile curves were calculated using the World Health Organization (WHO) charts.
PLS‐DA parameters and permutation test for distinguishing between gender and patterns of breastfeeding.
| Group Numbers | PLS‐DA parameters | Group Numbers | PLS‐DA parameters | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | (male–female) | Components | Q2 | R2 | Q2/ R2 | Ppermutation | (EBF–PBF) | Components | Q2 | R2 | Q2/ R2 | Ppermutation |
| 0.5 | 13–8 | 1 | -0.18 | 0.49 | -0.37 | 0.19 | 9–10 | 1 | 0.34 | 0.66 | 0.52 | 0.38 |
| 1 | 16–7 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.64 | 0.14 | 0.45 | 8–12 | 1 | 0.17 | 0.67 | 0.25 | 0.14 |
| 2 | 14–6 | 1 | -0.61 | 0.67 | -0.79 | 0.73 | 5–11 | 1 | -0.74 | 0.85 | -0.87 | 0.99 |
| 3 | 11–7 | 1 | -0.52 | 0.46 | -1.13 | 0.81 | 4–11 | 1 | -0.86 | 0.45 | -1.91 | 0.71 |
| 4 | 13–10 | 1 | -0.06 | 0.56 | -0.11 | 0.47 | 8–11 | 1 | -0.26 | 0.53 | -0.49 | 0.80 |
PLS-DA, partial least squares-discriminant analysis; yr, year; Q2, predictive capability; R2, correlation coefficients; EBF, exclusive breastfeeding; PBF, Partial breastfeeding.
aThe number of components based on Q2 indicates the best classifier of PLS-DA using a 10-fold cross-validation method.
b100 random permutations were performed.
PLS‐DA parameters and permutation test for distinguishing between age groups.
| PLS‐DA parameters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | Group Numbers | Components | Q2 | R2 | Q2/R2 | Ppermutation |
| 0.5–1 | 21–23 | 1 | 0.682 | 0.756 | 0.90 | 0.01 |
| 1–2 | 23–20 | 2 | 0.119 | 0.750 | 0.16 | 0.04 |
| 2–3 | 20–18 | 3 | 0.086 | 0.803 | 0.11 | 0.24 |
| 3–4 | 18–23 | 1 | -0.243 | 0.448 | -0.54 | 0.41 |
PLS-DA, partial least squares-discriminant analysis; yr, year; Q2, predictive capability; R2, correlation coefficients.
aThe number of components based on Q2 indicates the best classifier of PLS-DA using a 10-fold cross-validation method.
b100 random permutations were performed.
The VIP score and fold change of metabolites significantly differentially expressed between exclusive and partial breastfeeding at different years of age.
| Age 0.5 | Age 1 | Age 2 | Age 3 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolites | Chemical shift | VIP score | Fold change | VIP score | Fold change | VIP score | Fold change | VIP score | Fold change | |||||
| Creatine | 3.935(s) | 6.86 | 0.55 | 6.97 | 0.76 | 1.96 | 1.08 | 0.827 | 3.90 | 0.88 | 0.679 | |||
| Glycine | 3.575–3.565(s) | 4.66 | 1.28 | 5.16 | 1.30 | 5.42 | 0.79 | 0.090 | 3.01 | 0.88 | 0.254 | |||
| Fucose | 1.265–1.246(d) | 3.65 | 1.49 | 2.31 | 1.16 | - | 1.01 | 0.827 | - | 0.96 | 0.953 | |||
| Glutamine | 2.465–2.425(m) | 3.45 | 1.17 | - | 1.03 | 0.824 | - | 1.01 | 0.510 | - | 1.00 | 1.000 | ||
| Hippuric acid | 7.575–7.545(n) | 3.41 | 0.49 | 3.32 | 0.61 | 4.24 | 1.52 | 0.320 | 5.31 | 0.58 | 0.859 | |||
| Lysine | 1.915–1.865(m) | 2.74 | 0.87 | - | 0.99 | 1.000 | 2.27 | 0.92 | 0.221 | - | 0.99 | 1.000 | ||
| 2.055–2.045(m) | 2.73 | 1.14 | 3.46 | 1.17 | - | 1.01 | 0.913 | - | 0.95 | 0.953 | ||||
| Methylmalonic acid | 1.235–1.226(d) | 2.45 | 1.30 | - | 1.08 | 0.295 | - | 0.93 | 0.510 | 1.98 | 0.89 | 0.310 | ||
| Carnitine | 3.235–3.225(s) | 2.20 | 0.81 | 3.28 | 0.79 | 0.067 | - | 1.10 | 0.743 | - | 0.98 | 0.440 | ||
| 3-Methyl-2-oxovaleric acid | 1.115–1.106(d) | 2.01 | 0.65 | 1.84 | 0.76 | - | 1.11 | 0.510 | 2.35 | 1.41 | 0.099 | |||
| 3-Hydroxyisovaleric acid | 2.365(s) | 1.78 | 1.23 | - | 1.12 | 0.131 | - | 0.97 | 0.827 | - | 0.96 | 0.594 | ||
| Acetic acid | 1.925(s) | 3.68 | 1.75 | 0.079 | 7.44 | 2.69 | 3.37 | 0.80 | 0.267 | - | 1.06 | 1.000 | ||
| Formic acid | 8.465–8.455(s) | 1.50 | 1.36 | 0.356 | 2.96 | 1.63 | 2.38 | 0.69 | 0.145 | - | 0.91 | 0.768 | ||
| Galactose | 5.285–5.276(d) | - | 0.86 | 0.497 | 2.36 | 0.50 | 1.63 | 1.59 | 0.090 | 1.81 | 1.69 | 0.371 | ||
| Pantothenic acid | 0.895(s) | - | 0.96 | 0.549 | 1.59 | 0.80 | - | 1.14 | 0.267 | - | 1.15 | 0.254 | ||
| Hypoxanthine | 8.215–8.196(s) | - | 0.77 | 0.113 | - | 1.03 | 0.552 | 2.15 | 1.50 | - | 0.89 | 0.594 | ||
| 2-Phenylpropionic acid | 1.415(d) | - | 0.80 | - | 0.84 | 0.503 | - | 1.26 | 0.267 | 2.60 | 1.54 | |||
VIP, Variable Importance in Projection; s, singlet; d, doublet; m, multiplet; n, nonet.
VIP scores were obtained from PLS-DA model and a VIP score < 1.5 was shown as “-”.
Fold change was calculated by dividing the value of metabolites in children receiving exclusive breastfeeding by partial breastfeeding.
All P values < 0.05, which is in bold, are significant.
The VIP score and fold change of metabolites significantly differentially expressed between age groups.
| Age 0.5–1 | Age 1–2 | Age 2–3 | Age 3–4 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolites | Chemical shift | VIP score | Fold change | VIP score | Fold change | VIP score | Fold change | VIP score | Fold change | ||||
| Trimethylamine | 3.275–3.265(s) | 10.99 | 0.52 | 4.71 | 0.87 | 0.142 | 1.78 | 1.08 | 0.393 | 4.01 | 1.17 | ||
| Creatinine | 3.045(s) | 8.78 | 1.56 | - | 1.04 | 0.352 | - | 0.81 | 0.176 | - | 1.14 | 0.928 | |
| Creatine | 3.935(s) | 7.48 | 2.04 | - | 1.04 | 0.971 | - | 0.98 | 0.762 | - | 1.01 | 0.726 | |
| Betaine | 3.905(s) | 5.53 | 0.53 | 1.51 | 0.95 | 0.055 | - | 0.97 | 0.158 | 1.83 | 1.22 | 0.328 | |
| Citric acid | 2.575–2.515(d) | 4.15 | 0.79 | - | 0.99 | 0.782 | 2.92 | 0.93 | 0.426 | - | 0.97 | 0.687 | |
| 2.935–2.925(s) | 3.45 | 0.57 | 1.85 | 0.88 | 0.178 | 2.01 | 0.88 | 0.196 | - | 1.03 | 0.474 | ||
| Galactose | 3.515–3.485(dd) | 2.90 | 0.80 | - | 0.99 | 0.838 | - | 0.93 | 0.149 | - | 0.96 | 0.668 | |
| 7.375–7.355(m) | 2.89 | 1.85 | 2.18 | 1.15 | 0.462 | 2.96 | 1.20 | 0.217 | 2.45 | 0.86 | 0.256 | ||
| Dimethylamine | 2.715(s) | 2.75 | 0.47 | - | 0.93 | 0.352 | - | 1.03 | 0.099 | - | 1.01 | 0.886 | |
| Glycine | 3.575–3.565(s) | 2.57 | 0.82 | 2.21 | 1.09 | 0.240 | 2.10 | 0.90 | 0.346 | 1.57 | 1.06 | 0.668 | |
| Hippuric acid | 7.575–7.545(n) | 2.16 | 1.79 | 3.38 | 1.35 | 2.46 | 1.25 | 0.553 | - | 1.01 | 0.668 | ||
| Glutamine | 2.465–2.425(m) | 1.81 | 0.88 | 1.55 | 0.96 | 0.365 | 1.91 | 0.93 | 0.228 | 2.07 | 1.07 | 0.316 | |
| 2.055–2.045(m) | 1.79 | 0.88 | 2.15 | 0.93 | 0.142 | - | 0.96 | 0.718 | - | 1.04 | 0.507 | ||
| Lysine | 1.915–1.865(m) | 1.50 | 0.92 | - | 0.97 | 0.462 | 2.03 | 1.08 | 0.066 | - | 0.97 | 0.472 | |
| Carnitine | 3.235–3.225(s) | - | 1.09 | 0.167 | 3.39 | 0.84 | - | 1.05 | 0.675 | 3.42 | 1.26 | 0.107 | |
| Formic acid | 8.465–8.455(s) | - | 0.85 | 0.316 | 2.40 | 0.70 | - | 0.83 | 0.082 | - | 1.00 | 0.706 | |
| Lactose | 4.705–4.685(d) | - | 0.67 | 1.74 | 0.77 | 3.66 | 3.23 | 2.80 | 0.47 | 0.948 | |||
| 3-Methylhistidine | 7.015–7.005(s) | - | 1.37 | 1.51 | 1.32 | - | 0.99 | 0.317 | - | 1.00 | 0.687 | ||
| Acetic acid | 1.925(s) | - | 1.33 | 0.304 | - | 0.99 | 0.507 | 1.56 | 0.87 | - | 1.07 | 0.256 | |
VIP, Variable Importance in Projection; s, singlet; d, doublet; dd, doublet of doublets; m, multiplet; n, nonet.
VIP scores were obtained from PLS-DA model and a VIP score < 1.5 was shown as “-”.
All P values < 0.05, which is in bold, are significant.
Fig 1Heat map of 20 metabolites selected by the PLS-DA VIP score > 1.5 across 6 months to 4 years of age.
Each row represents a urine sample and each column represents the expression profile of a metabolite across age groups. The changes of x-fold standard deviation from the overall mean concentration for different years of age are shown in a color-coded way. Blue color represents a decrease, and red color an increase. PLS-DA, partial least squares-discriminant analysis; VIP, Variable Importance in Projection.
Fig 2Representative 600 MHz 1H-NMR spectra of urine showing the metabolite signals of 20 age-related metabolites (δ1–9).
With increasing age, red up arrow indicates a detected increase in metabolite concentration, whereas down blue arrow indicates a detected decrease in metabolite concentration. 1, 3-Aminoisobutyric acid; 2, acetic acid; 3, creatinine; 4, creatine; 5, N-phenylacetylglycine; 6, hippuric aicd; 7, lactic acid; 8, N-acetylglutamic acid; 9, succinic acid; 10, glutamine; 11, citric acid; 12, dimethylamine; 13, N,N-dimethylglycine; 14, Trimethylamine N-oxide; 15, galactose; 16, lysine; 17, betaine; 18, lactose; 19, formic acid; 20, 1-methylnicotinamide.
Metabolic pathway and function analysis between age groups.
| Age | Pathway Name | Total | Hits | Metabolites | Raw | FDR | Impact | Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5–1 | Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism | 48 | 4 | Glycine, Betaine, Creatine, | <0.001 | 0.017 | 0.246 | Amino acid |
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 75 | 4 | Histidine, Glutamine, Glycine, Lysine | 0.001 | 0.034 | 0.056 | Genetic Information Processing; Translation | |
| Methane metabolism | 34 | 3 | Trimethylamine | 0.001 | 0.034 | 0.001 | Energy | |
| Nitrogen metabolism | 39 | 3 | Histidine, Glutamine, Glycine | 0.002 | 0.038 | 0.000 | Energy | |
| 1–2 | Nitrogen metabolism | 39 | 5 | Formic acid, Histidine, Taurine, Glutamine, Glycine | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.000 | Energy |
| 2–3 | Nitrogen metabolism | 39 | 4 | Histidine, Taurine, Glutamine, Glycine | <0.001 | 0.033 | 0.000 | Energy |
| Galactose metabolism | 41 | 4 | Galactose, Lactose, Galactitol, Glucose 6-phosphate | <0.001 | 0.033 | 0.346 | Carbohydrate | |
| 3–4 | Nitrogen metabolism | 39 | 4 | Histidine, Taurine, Glutamine, Glycine | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.000 | Energy |
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 75 | 5 | Histidine, Glutamine, Glycine, Lysine, Threonine | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.056 | Genetic Information Processing; Translation |
Total is the total number of compounds in the pathway; the Hits is the actually matched number from the user uploaded data; the Raw P is the original P value calculated from the enrichment analysis; the false discovery rate (FDR) is the portion of false positives above the user-specified score threshold; the Impact is the pathway impact value calculated from pathway topology analysis.