| Literature DB >> 30178033 |
Andrea C Tricco1, Erin Lillie2, Wasifa Zarin2, Kelly K O'Brien3, Heather Colquhoun3, Danielle Levac4, David Moher5, Micah D J Peters6, Tanya Horsley7, Laura Weeks8, Susanne Hempel9, Elie A Akl10, Christine Chang11, Jessie McGowan12, Lesley Stewart13, Lisa Hartling14, Adrian Aldcroft15, Michael G Wilson16, Chantelle Garritty5, Simon Lewin17, Christina M Godfrey18, Marilyn T Macdonald19, Etienne V Langlois20, Karla Soares-Weiser21, Jo Moriarty22, Tammy Clifford8, Özge Tunçalp20, Sharon E Straus1.
Abstract
Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30178033 DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Intern Med ISSN: 0003-4819 Impact factor: 25.391