| Literature DB >> 36230279 |
Qiuyan Chen1,2, Xiaohui Li1, Jiarun Cui1, Caiyun Xu1, Hongfei Wei1, Qian Zhao2, Hongli Yao2, Hailong You2, Dawei Zhang1, Huimei Yu1,2.
Abstract
Specific pathogen-free (SPF) grade laboratory animals are kept in specific cages for life. The limited space could affect the characterization of colonization and dynamic changes related to gut microorganisms, and affect adipokines, even further affecting the fat synthesis and muscle quality of animals. The objective of this study was to analyze the stocking density on the dynamic distribution of gut microbiota, fat synthesis and muscle quality of SPF grade Kunming mice. Three housing densities were accomplished by raising different mice per cage with the same floor size. Kunming mice were reared at low stocking density (LSD, three mice a group), medium stocking density (MSD, 5 mice a group), and high stocking density (HSD, 10 mice a group) for 12 weeks. The results demonstrated that the stocking density affected intestinal microbial flora composition. We found that compared with the MSD group, the abundance of Lactobacillus in the LSD group and the HSD group decreased, but the abundance of unclassified_Porphyromonadaceae increased. Moreover, fat synthesis and muscle quality were linked to the intestinal microbial flora and stocking density. Compared with the LSD group and the HSD group, the MSD group had a more balanced gut flora, higher fat synthesis and higher muscle quality. Overall, this study demonstrated that stocking density could affect gut microbiota composition, and reasonable stocking density could improve fat synthesis and muscle quality. Our study will provide theoretical support for the suitable stocking density of laboratory animals.Entities:
Keywords: SPF Kunming mice; fatty acids; intestinal flora; muscle quality; stocking density
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230279 PMCID: PMC9559694 DOI: 10.3390/ani12192538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Primer Sequences.
| Primer Name | Sequence (5’-3’) |
|---|---|
|
| TGGCGTAGCAGGAAGTCTGA |
|
| GGCTCTATGGATTACCCAAGC |
|
| CGCCAACAATGGTATTGCAGC |
|
| GGGTGCGCTATGTGGATGG |
|
| CGGAGTCAGGTGAATACTCACG |
|
| TAAACGCAAGTGCCATTCCTG |
|
| AGGACCAACTGAGTGAAGTGA |
|
| AGACTGTCAACACTAAGAGGGT |
|
| TGGCCTTCCGTGTTCCTAC |
LPL, Lipoprotein lipase; FASN, Fatty acid synthase; ACACA, Acetyl-CoA carboxylases alpha; PNPLA2, Patatin Like Phospholipase Domain Containing 2; MYH1, Myosin heavy chain 1; MYH2, Myosin heavy chain 2; MYH4, Myosin heavy chain 4; MYH7, Myosin heavy chain 7; GAPDH, Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Figure 1Growth performances of Kunming mice reared in different stocking density groups. Date presented as mean ± SD.
Statistics of sequence data of all groups.
| Sample Name | Raw Reads | Clean Reads | Effective Reads | Effective (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSD | 172,621 | 171,854 | 120,409 | 70.06 |
| MSD | 182,646 | 180,548 | 126,361 | 69.99 |
| HSD | 226,753 | 224,399 | 169,981 | 75.75 |
Figure 2The intestinal contents of Kunming mice with different feeding densities were analyzed by 16S rRNA. Venn of bacterial communities (based on OTUs) in the sediment of treatments with different stocking densities in different density groups.
Figure 3Diversity of the bacterial communities. (A) Chao estimator (Chao). (B) Shannon diversity index (Shannon). (C) Simpson diversity index (Simpson). (D) Coverage diversity index (Coverage). Date presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 4Analysis of gut microbial OTUs structures based on bacterial communities. (A) Rarefaction curves for sequencing of 16SrRNA in colorectal microflora. (B) Curves for diversity of samples by Rank-Abundance.
Figure 5Multi-stage species composition analysis of single sample. (A) Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of the samples. Each sample was represented as a point. (B) Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial phylum. (C) Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial genu. (D) The heat map showing the composition of the phylum-level microbiota combined with the results from the cluster analysis. (E) The heat map showing the composition of the genu-level microbiota combined with the results from the cluster analysis.
The bacterial abundance of Kunming mice fed with LSD, MSD, and HSD for 12 weeks in phylum.
| Phylum | LSD (%) | MSD (%) | HSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firmicutes | 50.28 | 63.51 | 52.53 |
| Bacteroidetes | 40.93 | 21.78 | 25.14 |
| Proteobacteria | 3.15 | 5.35 | 4.24 |
| Cyanobacteria_Chloroplas | 1.75 | 0.32 | 3.46 |
| Actinobacteria | 1.46 | 4.01 | 1.46 |
| unclassified_Bacteria | 1.41 | 0.57 | 3.35 |
| Candidatus_Saccharibacteria | 0.84 | 0.66 | 0.76 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.16 | 3.74 | 9.04 |
| Tenericutes | 0.01246 | 0.00791 | 0.02118 |
| Planctomycetes | 0.00415 | 0.00712 | 0.00118 |
| Ignavibacteriae | 0.00166 | 0.00079 | 0.00118 |
| Chloroflexi | 0.00083 | 0.00079 | 0.00000 |
| Deferribacteres | 0.00083 | 0.03324 | 0.00235 |
| Acidobacteria | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00118 |
Statistics of bacterial abundance of Kunming mice in low density group, medium density group, and high stocking density group in genus.
| LSD | MSD | HSD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genu | Percent (%) | Genu | Percent (%) | Genu | Percent (%) |
| Lactobacillus | 31.05 | Lactobacillus | 40.91 | Lactobacillus | 41.16 |
| unclassified_Porphyromonadaceae | 21.73 | unclassified_Porphyromonadaceae | 14.99 | unclassified_Porphyromonadaceae | 20.96 |
| Alloprevotella | 6.58 | unclassified_Lachnospiraceae | 6.78 | Akkermansia | 9.04 |
| unclassified_Lachnospiraceae | 6.13 | unclassified_Erysipelotrichaceae | 4.46 | Streptophyta | 3.44 |
| Barnesiella | 5.99 | Akkermansia | 3.74 | unclassified_Bacteria | 3.35 |
| Bacteroides | 4.21 | Bifidobacterium | 3.58 | unclassified_Lachnospiraceae | 3.20 |
| Streptococcus | 3.37 | Turicibacter | 3.41 | Turicibacter | 2.36 |
| unclassified_Erysipelotrichaceae | 3.19 | Barnesiella | 2.02 | Barnesiella | 1.68 |
| Streptophyta | 1.73 | Alloprevotella | 1.90 | Acinetobacter | 1.35 |
| Turicibacter | 1.55 | unclassified_Desulfovibrionaceae | 1.70 | unclassified_Erysipelotrichaceae | 0.97 |
Figure 6Effect of feeding density on fat metabolism in Kunming mice. (A) qPCR analysis was performed to assess the mRNA abundance of LPL in mice of different feeding density. (B) qPCR analysis was performed to assess the mRNA abundance of FASN in Kunming mice of different feeding density. (C) qPCR analysis was performed to assess the mRNA abundance of ACACA in mice of different feeding density. (D) qPCR analysis was performed to assess the mRNA abundance of PNPLA2 in mice of different feeding density. Data were presented as a mean ± SD, n = 3, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, vs. MSD group.
Figure 7Effect of feeding density on muscle function of Kunming mice. (A) qPCR analysis was performed to assess the mRNA abundance of MYH1 in mice of different feeding density. (B) qPCR analysis was performed to assess the mRNA abundance of MYH2 in mice of different feeding density. (C) qPCR analysis was performed to assess the mRNA abundance of MYH4 in mice of different feeding density. (D) qPCR analysis was performed to assess the mRNA abundance of MYH7 in mice of different feeding density. Data were presented as a mean ± SD, n = 3, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, vs. MSD group.