| Literature DB >> 34911479 |
Daniel A Bizjak1, Martina Zügel2, Uwe Schumann2, Mark A Tully3, Dhayana Dallmeier4,5,6, Michael Denkinger4,5,7, Jürgen M Steinacker2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inactive physical behavior among the elderly is one risk factor for cardiovascular disease, immobility and increased all-cause mortality. We aimed to answer the question whether or not circulating and skeletal muscle biomarkers are differentially expressed depending on fitness status in a group of elderly individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Health services for older individuals; Molecular adaptations; Physical fitness; Sedentary behavior; Skeletal muscle
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34911479 PMCID: PMC8672635 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02666-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Fig. 1Schematic overview of the study design. After SITLESS, participants were asked to participate in this sub-study. A muscle biopsy was conducted at least one week before the CPX. Muscle samples were used for Myosin-Heavy chain (MyH) isoform composition and gene expression analysis. Blood was sampled before (pre) and directly after the CPX (post), and serum protein expression determined. Participants were classified according to the VO2peak measured during CPX by spiroergometry into HPF and LPF. (SITLESS: multinational 16-week long-intervention study to promote physical activity in the elderly population; CPX: cardiopulmonary exercise test; VO2peak: peak oxygen consumption; HPF: high physical fitness group; LPF: low physical fitness group)
Anthropometric data of all participants and subdivided into trained (HPF) and untrained control group (LPF)
| Variables | Total ( | HPF ( | LPF ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| 75.25 | 5.44 | 74.4 | 5.7 | 76.1 | 5.2 | |
| 167.02 | 9.22 | 166.7 | 9.8 | 167.3 | 8.9 | |
| 79.96 | 18.34 | 71.54 * | 14.69 | 88.41 | 18.22 | |
| 28.22 | 5.05 | 25.51 ** | 3.13 | 30.93 | 5.23 | |
| 28.47 | 6.23 | 28.04 | 6.13 | 28.90 | 6.53 | |
| 27.80 | 11.50 | 20.20 *** | 6.79 | 35.40 | 10.14 | |
| 33.80 | 8.80 | 27.80 *** | 6.18 | 39.70 | 6.80 | |
| 15.00 | 1.71 | 15.40 | 1.62 | 14.80 | 1.72 | |
| 21.25 | 5.586 | 24.71 *** | 4.79 | 17.20 | 3.26 | |
| 1.04 | 0.35 | 1.10 | 0.37 | 0.97 | 0.32 | |
*p ≤ 0.05
**p ≤ 0.01
***p ≤ 0.001 indicate inter-group differences
Fig. 2Differences in aerobic capacity and anthropometry in HPF and LPF. A HPF showed significantly higher VO2peak/kg values compared with LPF (p < 0.001) with no difference in first ventilatory threshold VO2VT1. B Skeletal muscle mass (SSM) was statistically not different between the groups while body fat was higher in LPF (p < 0.001)
Fig. 3Correlation of variables known to affect performance, and which are changing during ageing. A Correlation of skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and VO2peak revealed no association in HPF or LPF. B No association was observed regarding age and SMM in both groups
Fig. 4MyHC fiber type composition of HPF and LPF. No differences were observed either in Type I fibers (HPF 17.53 ± 5.76%; LPF = 17.06 ± 5.55%), Typ IIa (HPF 36.43 ± 4.34%; LPF = 37.58 ± 4.02%) or Type IId/x fibers (HPF 46.03 ± 3.76%; LPF = 45.37 ± 5.14%)
Fig. 5Changes in serum concentrations of molecules involved in ageing, muscle damage and neurotrophic adaptation. HPF and LPF were examined after an acute exercise test (pre vs. post). A HSP70 showed non-significant higher basal values in HPF (p = 0.069) compared to LPF. B Plasma levels of BDNF were non-significantly higher in HPF pre and post. C Irisin concentrations were pre higher in HPF compared to LPF, but this difference was blunted post. D Serum concentration of inflammation marker Il-6 increased post in HPF and LPF. E Kynurenine did not differ in both groups, but due to an increase in LPF and a decrease in HPF post a tendency for different adaptations (p = 0.0927) was observed