Literature DB >> 21844251

Effects of stocking density on the growth performance and digestive microbiota of broiler chickens.

S Guardia1, B Konsak, S Combes, F Levenez, L Cauquil, J-F Guillot, C Moreau-Vauzelle, M Lessire, H Juin, I Gabriel.   

Abstract

Increased stocking densities are frequently reported to depress chicken growth performance, but the mechanisms behind this are not fully understood. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of stocking density on growth performance and digestive microbiota, known to be sensitive to environmental factors. Chickens were reared at 2 stocking densities, 12 or 17 birds/m(2). Growth performance was recorded between d 1 and 39, and litter was scored for quality on d 25, 31, and 37. Digestive microbiota was analyzed along the digestive tract (crop, ileum, ceca) of 3- and 6-wk-old chickens by using 2 molecular approaches: a qualitative method (fingerprinting by temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis) and a quantitative method (real-time PCR). An increase in stocking density was found to negatively affect the feed conversion ratio (+3.1%) and depress the daily BW gain of broilers (-5.5%) during the period from d 32 to 39 (P ≤ 0.05). Litter quality was reduced with the high stocking density as early as d 25. At 3 wk of age, stocking density strongly affected the fingerprint profiles of the bacterial community, with the highest modifications observed in the crop and ceca (R analysis of similarity = 0.77 and 0.69, respectively, P ≤ 0.05). At 6 wk of age, significant differences in the fingerprint profiles between the stocking densities appeared in the crop and ceca (R analysis of similarity = 0.52 and 0.27, respectively, P ≤ 0.05). The abundance of bacterial groups targeted by real-time PCR was affected by stocking density, but only to a limited extent. Because digestive microbiota may have consequences on the physiology of the digestive tract, its modification by an increase in stocking density may be involved in the reduced growth performance of the bird.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21844251     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-01311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 2. Productive performance and carcass characteristics.

Authors:  Alice P J T Garcês; Sónia M Santana Afonso; Abel Chilundo; Chenjerai T S Jairoce
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Effects of Eimeria tenella infection on chicken caecal microbiome diversity, exploring variation associated with severity of pathology.

Authors:  Sarah E Macdonald; Matthew J Nolan; Kimberley Harman; Kay Boulton; David A Hume; Fiona M Tomley; Richard A Stabler; Damer P Blake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Host and Environmental Factors Affecting the Intestinal Microbiota in Chickens.

Authors:  Jannigje G Kers; Francisca C Velkers; Egil A J Fischer; Gerben D A Hermes; J A Stegeman; Hauke Smidt
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  The Effect of Whey on Performance, Gut Health and Bone Morphology Parameters in Broiler Chicks.

Authors:  Vasileios Tsiouris; Michael G Kontominas; Giorgos Filioussis; Sofia Chalvatzi; Ilias Giannenas; Georgios Papadopoulos; Konstantinos Koutoulis; Paschalis Fortomaris; Ioanna Georgopoulou
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-05-05

Review 5.  Applications of Microbiome Analyses in Alternative Poultry Broiler Production Systems.

Authors:  Zhaohao Shi; Michael J Rothrock; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-05-24

Review 6.  Intergenerational Transmission of Characters Through Genetics, Epigenetics, Microbiota, and Learning in Livestock.

Authors:  Ingrid David; Laurianne Canario; Sylvie Combes; Julie Demars
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Impact of Selection for Digestive Efficiency on Microbiota Composition in the Chicken.

Authors:  Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau; Agnès Narcy; Nicole Rideau; Céline Chantry-Darmon; Marie-Yvonne Boscher; Nadine Sellier; Marie Chabault; Barbara Konsak-Ilievski; Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval; Irène Gabriel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of Captivity and Season on the Gut Microbiota of the Brown Frog (Rana dybowskii).

Authors:  Qing Tong; Xiao-Ning Liu; Zong-Fu Hu; Jia-Feng Ding; Jia Bie; Hong-Bin Wang; Jian-Tao Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  A Mathematical Model of Campylobacter Dynamics Within a Broiler Flock.

Authors:  Thomas Rawson; Marian Stamp Dawkins; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  Microbiota, Gut Health and Chicken Productivity: What Is the Connection?

Authors:  Juan M Diaz Carrasco; Natalia A Casanova; Mariano E Fernández Miyakawa
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.