AIM: To study the effects of different diets on intestinal microbiota and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) development at the same caloric intake. METHODS: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into five groups (six rats each). The control diet (CON) group and free high-fat diet (FFAT) group were allowed ad libitum access to a normal chow diet and a high-fat diet, respectively. The restrictive high-fat diet (RFAT) group, restrictive high-sugar diet (RSUG) group, and high-protein diet (PRO) group were fed a high-fat diet, a high-sugar diet, and a high-protein diet, respectively, in an isocaloric way. All rats were killed at 12 wk. Body weight, visceral fat index (visceral fat/body weight), liver index (liver/body weight), insulin resistance, portal lipopolysaccharide (LPS), serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and liver triglycerides were measured. The intestinal microbiota in the different groups of rats was sequenced using high-throughput sequencing technology. RESULTS: The FFAT group had higher body weight, visceral fat index, liver index, peripheral insulin resistance, portal LPS, serum ALT, serum AST, and liver triglycerides compared with all other groups (P < 0.05). Taking the same calories, the RFAT and RSUG groups demonstrated increased body weight, visceral fat index, peripheral insulin resistance and liver triglycerides compared with the PRO group (P < 0.05). The RFAT group also showed increased portal LPS compared with the PRO group (P < 0.05). Unweighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis of the sequencing data revealed that the intestinal microbiota structures of the CON, FFAT, RSUG and PRO groups were roughly separated away from each other. Taxon-based analysis showed that, compared with the CON group, the FFAT group had an increased abundance of Firmicutes, Roseburia and Oscillospira bacteria, a higher ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes, and a decreased abundance of Bacteroidetes, Bacteroides and Parabacteroides bacteria (P < 0.05). The RFAT group showed an increased abundance of Firmicutes and decreased abundance of Parabacteroides bacteria (P < 0.05). The RSUG group showed an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes and Sutterella bacteria, higher ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes, and a decreased abundance of Firmicutes (P < 0.05). The PRO group showed an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes, Prevotella, Oscillospira and Sutterella bacteria, and a decreased abundance of Firmicutes (P < 0.05). Compared with the FFAT group, the RFAT group had an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes, higher ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes, and decreased abundance of Firmicutes and Oscillospira bacteria (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with the high-protein diet, the NAFLD-inducing effects of high-fat and high-sugar diets are independent from calories, and may be associated with changed intestinal microbiota.
AIM: To study the effects of different diets on intestinal microbiota and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) development at the same caloric intake. METHODS: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into five groups (six rats each). The control diet (CON) group and free high-fat diet (FFAT) group were allowed ad libitum access to a normal chow diet and a high-fat diet, respectively. The restrictive high-fat diet (RFAT) group, restrictive high-sugar diet (RSUG) group, and high-protein diet (PRO) group were fed a high-fat diet, a high-sugar diet, and a high-protein diet, respectively, in an isocaloric way. All rats were killed at 12 wk. Body weight, visceral fat index (visceral fat/body weight), liver index (liver/body weight), insulin resistance, portal lipopolysaccharide (LPS), serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and liver triglycerides were measured. The intestinal microbiota in the different groups of rats was sequenced using high-throughput sequencing technology. RESULTS: The FFAT group had higher body weight, visceral fat index, liver index, peripheral insulin resistance, portal LPS, serum ALT, serum AST, and liver triglycerides compared with all other groups (P < 0.05). Taking the same calories, the RFAT and RSUG groups demonstrated increased body weight, visceral fat index, peripheral insulin resistance and liver triglycerides compared with the PRO group (P < 0.05). The RFAT group also showed increased portal LPS compared with the PRO group (P < 0.05). Unweighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis of the sequencing data revealed that the intestinal microbiota structures of the CON, FFAT, RSUG and PRO groups were roughly separated away from each other. Taxon-based analysis showed that, compared with the CON group, the FFAT group had an increased abundance of Firmicutes, Roseburia and Oscillospira bacteria, a higher ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes, and a decreased abundance of Bacteroidetes, Bacteroides and Parabacteroides bacteria (P < 0.05). The RFAT group showed an increased abundance of Firmicutes and decreased abundance of Parabacteroides bacteria (P < 0.05). The RSUG group showed an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes and Sutterella bacteria, higher ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes, and a decreased abundance of Firmicutes (P < 0.05). The PRO group showed an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes, Prevotella, Oscillospira and Sutterella bacteria, and a decreased abundance of Firmicutes (P < 0.05). Compared with the FFAT group, the RFAT group had an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes, higher ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes, and decreased abundance of Firmicutes and Oscillospira bacteria (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with the high-protein diet, the NAFLD-inducing effects of high-fat and high-sugar diets are independent from calories, and may be associated with changed intestinal microbiota.
Authors: S Bellentani; G Saccoccio; F Masutti; L S Crocè; G Brandi; F Sasso; G Cristanini; C Tiribelli Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2000-01-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Lixin Zhu; Susan S Baker; Chelsea Gill; Wensheng Liu; Razan Alkhouri; Robert D Baker; Steven R Gill Journal: Hepatology Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Fredrik Bäckhed; Hao Ding; Ting Wang; Lora V Hooper; Gou Young Koh; Andras Nagy; Clay F Semenkovich; Jeffrey I Gordon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-10-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Núria Roglans; Laia Vilà; Mireia Farré; Marta Alegret; Rosa María Sánchez; Manuel Vázquez-Carrera; Juan Carlos Laguna Journal: Hepatology Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Froukje J Verdam; Susana Fuentes; Charlotte de Jonge; Erwin G Zoetendal; Runi Erbil; Jan Willem Greve; Wim A Buurman; Willem M de Vos; Sander S Rensen Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-06-22 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Alison L Harte; Nancy F da Silva; Steven J Creely; Kirsty C McGee; Thomas Billyard; Elham M Youssef-Elabd; Gyanendra Tripathi; Esmat Ashour; Mohga S Abdalla; Hayat M Sharada; Ashraf I Amin; Alastair D Burt; Sudhesh Kumar; Christopher P Day; Philip G McTernan Journal: J Inflamm (Lond) Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Audrey M Neyrinck; Sam Possemiers; Céline Druart; Tom Van de Wiele; Fabienne De Backer; Patrice D Cani; Yvan Larondelle; Nathalie M Delzenne Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Simon Steenson; A Margot Umpleby; Julie A Lovegrove; Kim G Jackson; Barbara A Fielding Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Chen Diling; Zheng Chaoqun; Yang Jian; Li Jian; Su Jiyan; Xie Yizhen; Lai Guoxiao Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Ivan M Petyaev; Pavel Y Dovgalevsky; Natalia E Chalyk; Victor A Klochkov; Nigel H Kyle; Yuriy K Bashmakov Journal: Int J Chronic Dis Date: 2018-04-01