Eduardo P Milan1,2, Mirella R V Bertolo3, Virginia C A Martins3, César Enrique Sobrero4, Ana M G Plepis1,3, Thomas Fuhrmann-Lieker2, Marilia M Horn2. 1. Interunits Graduate Program in Bioengineering (EESC/FMRP/IQSC), University of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil. 2. Physical Chemistry of Nanomaterials, Institute of Chemistry and Center for Interdisciplinary Nanostructure Science and Technology (CINSaT), University of Kassel, Kassel 34132, Germany. 3. São Carlos Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil. 4. Institute of Materials Engineering, University of Kassel, Kassel 34125, Germany.
Abstract
A proper valorization of biological waste sources for an effective conversion into composites for tissue engineering is discussed in this study. Hence, the collagen and the phenolic compound applied in this investigation were extracted from waste sources, respectively, fish industry rejects and the peels of the mangosteen fruit. Porous scaffolds were prepared by combining both components at different compositions and mineralized at different temperatures to evaluate the modifications in the biomimetic formation of apatite. The inclusion of mangosteen extract showed the advantage of increasing the collagen denaturation temperature, improving the stability of its triple helix. Moreover, the extract provided antioxidant activity due to its phenolic composition, as confirmed by 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) antioxidant assays. Mineralization was successfully achieved as indicated by thermogravimetry and scanning electron microscopy. A higher temperature and a lower extract concentration reduced the calcium phosphate deposits. The extract also affected the pore size, particularly at a lower concentration. The X-ray diffraction pattern identified a low degree of crystallization. A high mineralization temperature induced the formation of smaller crystallites ranging from 18.9 to 25.4 nm. Although the deposited hydroxyapatite showed low crystallinity, the scaffolds are suitable for bone tissue applications and may be effective in controlling the resorbability rate in tissue regeneration.
A proper valorization of biological waste sources for an effective conversion into composites for tissue engineering is discussed in this study. Hence, the collagen and the phenolic compound applied in this investigation were extracted from waste sources, respectively, fish industry rejects and the peels of the mangosteen fruit. Porous scaffolds were prepared by combining both components at different compositions and mineralized at different temperatures to evaluate the modifications in the biomimetic formation of apatite. The inclusion of mangosteen extract showed the advantage of increasing the collagen denaturation temperature, improving the stability of its triple helix. Moreover, the extract provided antioxidant activity due to its phenolic composition, as confirmed by 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) antioxidant assays. Mineralization was successfully achieved as indicated by thermogravimetry and scanning electron microscopy. A higher temperature and a lower extract concentration reduced the calcium phosphate deposits. The extract also affected the pore size, particularly at a lower concentration. The X-ray diffraction pattern identified a low degree of crystallization. A high mineralization temperature induced the formation of smaller crystallites ranging from 18.9 to 25.4 nm. Although the deposited hydroxyapatite showed low crystallinity, the scaffolds are suitable for bone tissue applications and may be effective in controlling the resorbability rate in tissue regeneration.
Modern society is currently
finding innovative alternatives for
valorizing waste sources, minimizing disposal volumes, and eventually
protecting the environment. Food waste has different definitions according
to distinct countries and environmental agencies. A general description
may be summarized as any byproduct from food production, processing,
distribution, or consumption.[1] The valorization
of waste sources in the production of value-added products represents
a research field increasing in the last years, not only in the extraction
and isolation of chemical compounds but also in biogas production.[2]In many countries, an important source
of food and incoming is
found in fish production. In 2014, approximately 167 million tons
of fish were produced from capture and aquaculture,[3] and such a high amount of fishery products reflects in
a generation of vast quantities of residues.[4] Only 40% of the catch is used for consumption, while the other 60%
is considered waste, arising in pollution due to the incorrect disposal
of the organic material.[5] For that reason,
efforts to deal efficiently with fish waste are necessary. In this
study, we emphasize the valorization of fish processing waste as a
source of compounds for the production of functional materials.Fish skin is the major byproduct of the fish processing industry
and a valuable collagen source. Even though mammalian animals, like
pigs and cows, are traditional sources of this protein, freshwater
byproducts are an alternative to outline religious reasons and potential
risks of viral contamination, widespread issues when mammals are used.[6] Collagen is a dominant structural compound in
fish skin, and it is responsible for the integrity of the extracellular
matrix and connective tissues in the animal kingdom. To date, 29 different
types of collagen with a specific amino acid sequence have been reported.
The most common form is the collagen type I found in skin, tendon,
and bone tissues. Collagen type I consists of three helical polypeptide
chains with a repetitive sequence Gly-X-Y, where X and Y are generally
occupied by proline (Pro) and hydroxyproline (Hyp).[7]Natural phenolic compounds can interact with collagen
through electrostatic
and van der Waals forces. This strategy allows the combination of
characteristics of both components and enhances specific properties
of collagen materials, targeting different aims, such as their application
in the reconstruction of damaged tissues. The xanthones found in the
mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana) peel
extract are potential phenolic compounds that can improve the antioxidant
properties of the collagen scaffolds. Mangosteen is a tropical tree
native to Southeast Asia and cultivated for its tart-sweet fruit.
It is mainly valued for the use of its succulent pulp, while its pericarp
portion, rich in xanthone compounds, is wasted. Thus, natural antioxidant
compounds from mangosteen peel extract are a great source, as these
active substances show various health effects.[8]The anti-inflammatory action of α-mangostin, the majority
phenolic compound found in mangosteen peel, is already known in the
literature, mainly in treating rheumatoid arthritis.[9] Additionally, phenolic compounds delay or prevent free
radical oxidation, which is responsible for damaging cells and tissues.
Those oxidation processes are related to the first stages of carcinogenesis.[10] As the main application concerns tissue regeneration,
the association of collagen and mangosteen provides a valuable material
with antioxidant properties, with compounds that can scavenge free
radicals and effectively accelerate the regeneration process.The central feature of bone substitute materials is to exhibit
properties that ideally result in total integration with natural bone
tissue.[11] In this sense, designed scaffolds
using inspiration from the complex hierarchical structure of bone
are good candidates for bone tissue regeneration. In vertebrates,
biomineralization is the process responsible for regulating and creating
the skeleton’s hierarchical structures.[12]Mineralized collagen consists of collagen/hydroxyapatite
(HA) hybrid
composites and has been developed to mimic the natural structure of
the bone. Unlike synthetic bone grafts that only act as a structural
replacement, mineralized collagen scaffolds are bioabsorbable and
osteoconductive, essential for tissue regeneration.[13] During the mineralization process, nucleation sites and
intramolecular collagen spaces are essential for the nucleation and
growth of the hydroxyapatite crystals. However, the method should
be adequately chosen to prevent the denaturation of the protein and
conservation of the triple helix structure, essential for biological
interactions with natural tissue.A few studies describe the in vitro mineralization
of collagen extracted from marine and freshwater sources. In fact,
a low denaturation temperature found in that collagen sources is a
limitation for their use, demanding alternatives to produce stable
collagen scaffolds at human body temperature.[14,15] We recently found that collagen phosphorylation of Tilapia fish
skin increased the thermal stability of the protein triple helix structure
and outlined the low denaturation temperature obstacle.[16] Nevertheless, even though an increase of about
7 °C in the denaturation temperature was observed, the stability
achieved in the collagen fibers was insufficient to perform the mineralization
process under body conditions.Consequently, increased intramolecular
interactions could also
enhance the collagen triple helix stability. Therefore, the natural
antioxidant compounds from mangosteen peel extract may actively perform
that role by forming hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl groups of
xanthones and amino groups in the collagen. Then, the present study
focuses on preparing in vitro mineralized fish collagen/hydroxyapatite
scaffolds enriched with mangosteen extract, aiming at gathering the
xanthones as potential antioxidant compounds and natural cross-linking
agents.
Materials and Methods
For the collagen
type I source, random fresh skins of Nile Tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus) were collected
from Pesque Pague Moinho (São Carlos, Brazil), and the mangosteen
peel extract was obtained from mangosteen fruit (G.
mangostana), acquired from a local market (São
Carlos, Brazil). All chemicals were of analytical grade, purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich, and used as received without any further purification.
Collagen Extraction and Characterization
The collagen was obtained as described earlier.[16] In summary, the fish skins were cleaned, scraped, and washed
in 0.9 wt % saline solution and deionized water. After that,
the fat content was removed with 1:1 acetone:ethanol solution and
the samples were thoroughly washed with deionized water. The cleaned
skins were submerged in a base solution for 48 h, followed by stabilization
for 6 h in a sodium, potassium, and calcium sulfates and chlorides
solution. The excess salt was removed with boric acid, deionized water,
and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA). Acetic acid pH 3.5 was
used for the collagen extraction, and the gel was neutralized with
sodium hydroxide and then dialyzed against deionized water, followed
by freeze-drying.The collagen molecular weight was determined
by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE),
in the range of 130–150 kDa. Additionally, the α1/α2
ratio measured with optical densitometry confirmed that the extracted
collagen is mainly Type I.[16]
Mangosteen Extraction and Characterization
The mangosteen peels were manually removed from the fruit, washed,
dried, and milled. After sieving, the powder obtained was refluxed
in a methanol/ethanol solution for 3 h, with further solvent evaporation
and freeze-drying.[17] The mangosteen extract
was characterized by its total phenolic content and antioxidant properties,
using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic
acid) (ABTS) radicals.
Folin–Ciocalteu Method
The
total phenolic content (TPC) of mangosteen extract was determined
according to the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method, adapted
for a 96-well microplate procedure.[17] Briefly,
50 μL of mangosteen peel extract (100 μg mL–1) was mixed with 50 μL of Folin’s reagent
(Sigma-Aldrich); after 5 min, 200 μL of a sodium carbonate solution
(20%, w/w) was added to the wells to alkalize the medium and form
the blue phenolate anions. The absorbance was measured at 725 nm after
15 min in the dark, using a Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO UV–Vis
spectrophotometer. A hydroethanolic solution (60%, v/v) was used as
a blank, and gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as standard (y = 0.019x – 0.065, R2 = 0.9997).
The analysis was carried out in triplicate, and the result of mangosteen
peel extract TPC was expressed in mg gallic acid equivalent (mg GAE)
g–1 extract.
ABTS Antioxidant Assay
The 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic
acid) (ABTS) radical antioxidant assay was conducted according to
a procedure adapted from Re et al.[18] for
a 96-well microplate. The radical was prepared by mixing a 14 mmol
L–1 ABTS solution with a 4.9 mmol L–1 potassium persulfate solution for 15 h in the dark, followed by
dilution in ethanol to adjust the absorbance at 734 nm. A hydroethanolic
solution of mangosteen peel extract (20 μL, 25 μg mL–1) was mixed with 180 μL of ABTS radical. The
absorbance was measured at 734 nm after 10 min in a Thermo Scientific
Multiskan GO UV–vis spectrophotometer. A hydroethanolic solution
(60%, v/v) was used as a blank, and Trolox (6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic
acid) (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as standard (y = 5.9013x + 3.3046, R2 = 0.9994). The % inhibition of mangosteen
peel extract against ABTS radical was calculated according to eqThe analysis was carried out in triplicate,
and the result was expressed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant activity
(TEAC, μmol Trolox equivalent g–1 extract.)
DPPH Antioxidant Assay
The antioxidant
activity of mangosteen peel extract was also evaluated against the
2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical, according to the method
described by Pal et al.[19] and adapted for
a 96-well microplate. DPPH solution (180 μL, 0.01 mmol L–1) was placed to react with 20 μL of hydroethanolic
solutions of mangosteen peel extract in different concentrations (3.125
to 100 μg mL–1), diluted 15 × in each
well. After 30 min, the absorbance was measured at 517 nm in a Thermo
Scientific Multiscan GO UV–Vis spectrophotometer. The measurements
were carried out in triplicate, and the % inhibition of the extract
against the DPPH radical was calculated according to eq . By adjusting the curve of % inhibition
versus the log of extract concentration,[20] it was possible to calculate IC50, which corresponds
to the concentration of mangosteen peel extract needed to inhibit
50% of the DPPH radical. Moreover, it was possible to determine the
AAI,[21] that is, the antioxidant activity
index of the extract, according to eq .
Scaffolds Preparation and Mineralization
Collagen solution with a concentration of 3% (w/w) was prepared
by dissolving the freeze-dried fish collagen in 0.5% (w/w) lactic
acid, and the freeze-dried sample was used as the control scaffold,
labeled COL.Mangosteen extract (M) was added to collagen solution
at concentrations of 10 and 30% in relation to the dry mass of the
biopolymers. After the freeze-drying process, the samples were named
CM10 and CM30, respectively.The mineralization of the reference
scaffold (COL) and the corresponding
ones containing mangosteen extract (CM10 and CM30) was performed using
the alternate immersion method,[22] with
slight modifications. Briefly, the samples were immersed in 10 mL
of 0.067 mol L–1 CaCl2 solution buffered
with 0.05 mol L–1 Tris buffer (pH 7.4) for 30 min,
removed, washed with deionized water, and transferred to 10 mL of
0.04 mol L–1 Na2HPO4 solution
(pH 9), for 30 min. The process was repeated three times. Finally,
the scaffolds were rinsed with deionized water and freeze-dried.Two different temperatures were employed for the mineralization
process, 25 °C, and 37 °C. The scaffolds were identified
with a suffix (25 or 37), corresponding to the temperature used in
the process. Final mineralized samples were labeled: COL_25; COL_37;
CM10_25; CM10_37; CM30_25; and CM30_37.
Scaffolds Characterization
Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform
Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR)
For attenuated Total Reflectance
Fourier transform Infrared spectroscopy, an ATR_FTIR Bruker α
Platinum-ATR was used on a 4000–400 cm–1 interval
with 24 scans and a resolution of 4 cm–1. This method
enables a quick, easy, and reliable analysis of the scaffolds.
Swelling Degree
Prior to the swelling
test, the scaffolds COL, CM10, and CM30 were placed in a desiccator
in the presence of NaOH(s) for 24 h. The dried scaffolds were weighed
(dry weight) and placed in 5 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
pH 7.4. At predetermined times, the scaffolds were removed from the
medium and weighed (wet weight), until achieve equilibrium (120 min).
The process was carried out in triplicate. The swelling degree was
calculated by eq .
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
DSC was used to study the thermal stability of the collagen in
the scaffolds. The denaturation temperature characterizes the irreversible
transformation of the native helical structure into uncoiled one,
which means the loss of the structural integrity of the protein.[23] For this thermal profiling, a PerkinElmer DSC
7 was employed, in which the scaffolds (10 mg) were hermetically sealed
in aluminum pans, and heated at 5 °C min–1 under
a nitrogen atmosphere (90 mL min–1). The collagen
denaturation temperature was calculated using the inflection point
of the thermal event.
Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
TGA was carried out using a PerkinElmer Pyris Diamond TG/DTA. Heating
was performed in a platinum crucible in synthetic airflow (90 mL min–1) at a rate of 10 °C min–1 from
30 to 700 °C. The sample weight was in the range of 9–10
mg. The residue at 700 °C determined the calcium phosphate content.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
SEM was employed to analyze the morphology and pore sizes of the
scaffolds. The nonmineralized samples were placed in stubs and metalized
in a Polaron Range metallizer at 1.10–1 mbar and
pressure chamber of 20 mA, covering samples with a 12 nm platinum
and analyzed in a Hitachi S-4000 at 9 kV. For mineralized samples
a FEI-Quanta 250 FEG at 20 kV from the Werkstoffe des Bauwesens und
Bauchemie, Universität Kassel, Germany was used without coating
of samples. The ImageJ software was used to measure the pore size.
Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP)
The porosity of the scaffolds was investigated by MIP with a Poremaster
from Quantachrome (Boynton Beach, FL). The technique is based on using
high pressure to force mercury into pore spaces, in which the required
equilibrated pressure gives porosity properties, described by the
ratio of cumulative of all pores in the scaffolds and the total volume
of the sample.
Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX)
Mineralized scaffold composition was evaluated by their Ca/P content
ratio using EDX semiquantitative measurement. A FEI-Quanta 250 FEG
equipment from the Werkstoffe des Bauwesens und Bauchemie, Universität
Kassel, Germany, was employed for the measurement.
X-ray Diffraction
X-ray diffractograms
were performed in a Phillips PW 3710 MPD equipment, using Cu Kα
radiation, 50 kV, 80 mA, rate scanning 2° min–1 and 2θ between 5 and 80°. Li et al.[24] described that the average size of the apatite crystallite
(L) is calculated from the Scherrer equation (eq )where L is the average crystallite
size, λ is the wavelength of the X-radiation (1.54178 Å), K is a constant related to the crystallite shape, βm is the full width of the peak at half-maximum (FWHM), and
θ is the diffraction angle of the chosen peak (plane 002 reflection).The degree of crystallinity (Xc) expresses
the fraction of the crystalline apatite phase and was assessed using eq where Xc is the
degree of crystallinity, β002 is the FWHM of the
002 plane reflection, and 0.24 is a constant found for many HA powders.[25]Scaffolds pore size and Ca/P ratio on
mineralized samples values
were statistically treated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and
Tukey’s test on Origin software with a significance level set
at 5%.
Results and Discussion
Mangosteen Extract Characterization
The total phenolic content is a useful measure of the antioxidant
power and the reducing activity of a plant extract. It quantitatively
determines polyphenols, molecules that act as primary antioxidants
and as free radical reducers, being responsible for most of the antioxidant
activity attributed to plants and their derivatives.[26,27] The TPC of the mangosteen peel extract obtained by a methanol/ethanol
(70:30) extraction is shown in Table . A value of about 112 mg GAE g–1 mangosteen peel extract was determined, consistent with that found
in the literature for mangosteen peel and pericarp extracts, obtained
by various extraction methods and using different solvents. Suttirak
and Manurakchinakorn[28] evaluated the TPC
of mangosteen peel extracts obtained in different concentrations of
ethanol and water. The extract with the highest TPC was obtained with
the 50:50 mixture, presenting 152.52 mg GAE g–1 extract,
a value close to that determined in this study. The mangosteen peel
extract obtained by Chaiwarit et al.[29] from
microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), with a 60:40 ethanol/water mixture,
presented about 143.6 mg GAE g–1 of dry matter (DM),
a value higher than that brought by Wittenauer, Schweiggert-Weisz,
and Carle[27] for the mangosteen pericarp
extract obtained by extraction with ethanol/water (50:50) (85.4 mg
GAE g–1 DM).
Table 1
Total Phenolic Content (TPC) and Antioxidant
Activity against ABTS and DPPH Radicals for Mangosteen Peel Extract
TPC (mg GAE g–1 extract)
112.05 ± 5.27
TEACa (μmol Trolox equivalent
g–1 extract)
2330.56 ± 81.08
IC50b (μg mL–1)
8.74
AAIa
2.75
Determined by the ABTS antioxidant
assay.
Determined by the
DPPH antioxidant
assay.
Determined by the ABTS antioxidant
assay.Determined by the
DPPH antioxidant
assay.It is worth noting that the phenolic content of a
plant extract
is a specific value for each product, with no “correct”
quantity to be determined since there are several factors, intrinsic
and extrinsic, that can affect this property: the fruit ripening stage
(the TPC of the mangosteen peel tends to decrease according to the
maturation progress), the polarity of the solvent used during the
extraction process (more polar solvents tend to extract a higher content
of polyphenols from mangosteen peel extract), and the variables of
the extraction process adopted (sample pretreatment, solid/liquid
ratio, the proportion between the solvents used, microwave or ultrasound
assistance, stirring, among others).[26,28,29]The ABTS antioxidant assay provides a measurement
of the antioxidant
power of mangosteen extract by the discoloration of the ABTS radical
at 734 nm. The average value of Trolox obtained for a 25 μg
mL–1 hydroethanolic solution of mangosteen peel
extract was 5.83 ± 0.20 μmol L–1, corresponding
to an average inhibition of 37.69 ± 1.20% of the ABTS radical.
The result of the inhibitory power of the extract against the radical
can be expressed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant activity (TEAC),
corresponding to 2330 ± 81 μmol Trolox equivalent g–1 mangosteen peel extract (Table ). The ethanolic and methanolic extracts
from the mangosteen pericarp obtained by Zarena and Sankar[26] showed maximum activity (100% inhibition) of
34.95 and 31.25 μmol L–1 Trolox equivalent
at 100 μg mL–1 of extract. Wittenauer, Schweiggert-Weisz,
and Carle,[27] in turn, obtained a value
of 1063.69 μmol of Trolox equivalent g–1 of
mangosteen pericarp extract.Regarding the inhibition results
against the DPPH radical, the
mangosteen peel extract showed an IC50 of 8.75 μg
mL–1, the concentration necessary to stabilize 50%
of the DPPH radical by the donation of the hydrogens from the hydroxyl
groups of the phenolics present in the extract. The results imply
that the mangosteen peel extract can act as a primary antioxidant,
reacting and stabilizing free radicals such as DPPH by hydrogen donation.
Zarena and Sankar[26] also calculated the
IC50 for mangosteen pericarp extracts obtained with different
solvents. The methanolic extracts presented, respectively, IC50 of 52.62 and 69.43 μg mL–1, superior
to those of acetone, ethyl acetate, and water/acetone extracts. Indeed,
the higher the IC50, the greater the amount of extract
required for the 50% inhibition of DPPH. The extract obtained from
the mangosteen peel with a 70:30 methanol/ethanol mixture in this
study showed a higher antioxidant activity value than all of the pericarp
extracts obtained.[26]The IC50 value can also be used to calculate the antioxidant
activity index of the extract (AAI), determined by specific ranges.
In fact, AAI < 0.5 indicates low antioxidant activity, between
0.5 and 1.0 represents moderate antioxidant activity, between 1.0
and 2.0 indicates strong antioxidant activity, and greater than 2.0
represents very strong.[21] The antioxidant
activity calculated for mangosteen peel extract in this study (AAI
= 2.75) reinforces the aim of its addition, that is, to incorporate
a plant extract rich in polyphenolic compounds to improve the active
properties of collagen scaffolds.The main
task of tissue engineering scaffolds is to mimic the function of the
extracellular matrix, providing appropriate design parameters on the
essential structural, physicochemical, and composition properties.
Considering the change in scaffold composition and mineralization
conditions, like temperature, variation of properties could be achieved.
Consequently, properties like pore size, mineralization amount, and
crystallinity of the inorganic deposit are evaluated in this study.
ATR-FTIR
The bands for nonmineralized
samples (Figure S1-Sn) allow the identification
of amides A and B (3272–3240 and 2940–3080 cm–1 regions) and amides I, II, and III found in the ranges of 1700–1600,
1532–1555, and 1240 cm–1, respectively, all
corresponding to collagen.[30] Mangosteen
extract characteristic bands were previously described at 1640 cm–1 from C=O stretching vibration and at 1450
cm–1 from skeletal C=C aromatic vibration.[31] When incorporated into collagen scaffolds, the
extract bands overlap the collagen ones, making them indistinguishable.
Nevertheless, no notable alteration or shifting in the band positions
was observed, indicating that electrostatic forces purely cause the
interaction between both components.FTIR spectra of the mineralized
samples obtained at both temperatures and different collagen/mangosteen
compositions are shown in Figure . Bands at around 1020 cm–1 and between
560 and 600 cm–1, characteristics from PO43– vibrational stretching and deformational vibration,
respectively, are observed.[32] All of those
bands are associated with phosphate salt formation, the first indicator
of the successful mineralization process. The finding bands from phosphate
in all mineralized samples showed that the composition and mineralization
temperature did not interfere with the deposit of these inorganic
salt in the scaffolds. Consequently, all of the samples were considered
for further characterization.
Figure 1
FTIR spectra for (a) COL_25; (b) COL_37; (c)
CM10_25; (d) CM10_37;
(e) CM30_25; and (f) CM30_37.
FTIR spectra for (a) COL_25; (b) COL_37; (c)
CM10_25; (d) CM10_37;
(e) CM30_25; and (f) CM30_37.As previously stated, the presence of amides I,
II, and III are
characteristic of collagen triple helix, and its stability can be
calculated by the ratio of amide III peak (1240 cm–1) and the peak at 1450 cm–1, associated with the
proline/hydroxyproline C–H bond of the pyrrolidine ring (Table S1-Sn). Both bands are sensitive to structural
changes in the protein backbone chain, in which a ratio close to 1
implies collagen structural integrity. Ratio values closer to 0.5
indicate a triple helix rupture, the once ordinated tripe helix is
randomly coiled, and all of the biological properties of collagen
are missed.[33]Evaluating the stability
and existence of collagen triple helix
structure in the scaffolds is essential for tissue engineering applications.
In fact, the helicoidal form is involved in the biological recognition
process, as specific triple-helical domains are identified as cell
adhesion sites.[34] The determined 1240/1450
cm–1 ratio showed values ranging from 0.96 to 1.06,
indicating the structural integrity of the collagen in the scaffolds.The resulting reference
scaffold (COL) and the corresponding ones containing mangosteen extract
(CM10 and CM30) were monitored by measuring changes in their weight
over time when incubated in a PBS medium. The determined swelling
ability was observed in all of the scaffolds and reached equilibrium
within 2 h, without dissolution of the sample at the end of the experiment
(Figure S2-Sn). All scaffolds swelled rapidly
in contact with PBS, and the absorption of the buffer depends on the
presence and concentration of mangosteen. The equilibrium swelling
after 2 h was 1180 ± 35% (COL), 646 ± 31% (CM10), and
484 ± 23% (CM30). The reduction of swelling percentage is directly
associated with an increase in the intramolecular interactions between
the collagen and the mangosteen extract incorporated in the scaffolds.
Indeed, it is known that the swelling capacity of a polymer network
depends on the degree of cross-linking.[35] Therefore, the swelling tests confirmed the presence of a high amount
of interactions between collagen and the phenolic compound, and the
observed behavior is concentration-dependent.Collagen is composed of amino acid chains that fold into a triple
helix structure. As discussed before, its unique property is necessary
for tissue engineering materials. At the denaturation temperature
(Td), the once ordinated triple helix is turned into an unwinder form,
and random chains are observed.[23]The denaturation temperature involves the rupture of interchain hydrogen
bonds and correlates to chain mobility. Collagen modifications, like
cross-linking process or the addition of stable inorganic compounds,
modify the network architecture, affecting the triple helix stability.[23] Indeed, a higher Td means a stronger interchain
bonding between the collagen chains. Fish skin typically provides
collagen with lower Td than mammalian ones, limiting the use and processability
of scaffolds prepared with those sources. Thus, enhancing this property
is beneficial and desirable for the target application.Due
to the low heat flow associated with the collagen denaturation
thermal transition, mineralized scaffolds prepared at both temperatures
did not show an inflection point in DSC measurements, characteristic
of this conversion of the protein conformation. This behavior is probably
associated with the high calcium phosphate deposits in the scaffolds.
Nevertheless, the FTIR analysis showed a stable collagen conformation
for these samples.The control collagen sample (COL) showed
a Td of 33.5 °C (Figure a), a comparable
value also described for collagen extracted from scales of the marine
fish barramundi (Lates calcarifer),
of 36.4 °C.[36] The mangosteen addition
increased the temperature to 43.8 °C (CM10, Figure b) and 54.4 °C (CM30, Figure c). As the extract
concentration directly relates to high triple helix stability, we
conclude that its presence increases the number of hydrogen bonds
formed in the collagen network.[37] Indeed,
mangosteen extract is rich in xanthones compounds that can raise the
number of linkages, reflecting an increase of Td. It is important
to note that its addition did not interfere with the triple-helical
structure of collagen.
Figure 2
DSC curves of the scaffolds: (a) COL, (b) CM10, and (c)
CM30.
DSC curves of the scaffolds: (a) COL, (b) CM10, and (c)
CM30.
Thermogravimetry
TGA analysis assesses
the thermal stability and the weight loss steps associated with weight
change when the scaffolds are heated at a constant rate. Additionally,
it allows determining the deposit calcium phosphate content by analyzing
the residue value.All of the samples, mineralized or not, showed
the same pattern of weight loss percentage, divided into three steps
(Figures S3-Sn and S4-Sn). The first step
(30–200 °C range), related to the moisture content, is
the initial break of inter and intramolecular along with hydrogen
bonds, releasing the surrounding water molecules and disrupting the
collagen triple helix. Degradation of polymeric chains occurred in
the second step (200–500 °C), while the third step (500–700
°C) was associated with organic carbonization. The remaining
residue is associated with the inorganic deposits obtained by the in vitro mineralization process. The weight loss percentage
values in each step are given in Table .
Table 2
Percentage of Weight Loss at Different
Temperature Ranges, Residue Percentage, and Tonset Obtained
through TGA
% weight
loss
scaffold
30–200 °C
200–500 °C
500–700 °C
%residue (700 °C)
Tonset (°C)
COL
8.34
63.16
27.54
0.96
237.42
CM10
18.17
62.63
17.82
1.38
274.12
CM30
13.47
57.12
28.59
0.29
283.30
COL_25
8.41
50.12
23.79
17.68
258.55
COL_37
7.60
53.69
30.99
7.72
251.01
CM10_25
9.11
52.60
17.67
20.62
267.39
CM10_37
9.84
51.00
31.77
7.38
269.90
CM30_25
7.37
56.61
25.40
10.61
256.52
CM30_37
6.44
52.70
30.17
10.69
254.64
In general, all of the scaffolds showed a similar
weight loss percentage
associated with the first step, except for those prepared with mangosteen
extract and not mineralized (CM10 and CM30). The difference might
be related to the xanthones cross-linking effect in the collagen,
reflecting more hydrating water molecules due to an increasing number
of OH groups. The same effect was not observed for the mineralized
samples since calcium phosphate deposits act as a steric hindrance,
reducing the amount of hydrating water molecules.The residue
content related to the apatite deposits increased in
the mineralized samples compared to those nonmineralized. The chosen
mineralization temperature affected the quantity of observed residue,
as noted for the scaffolds prepared with collagen and low mangosteen
extract concentration. In both cases, a reduction of about 35% (COL_25
and COL_37) and 43% (CM10_25 and CM10_37) was achieved when the temperature
used in the mineralization process increased from 25 to 37 °C.
In fact, COL and CM10 scaffolds displayed lower Td values (33.5 and
45.3 °C, respectively), as observed by DSC measurements.The CM30_25 and CM30_37 scaffolds revealed similar mineral deposition
percentages. These results are associated with high thermal stability,
as CM30 showed a higher Td value (54.4 °C), indicating a high
resistance to temperature conditions in the mineralization procedure.
Although fewer mineral deposits were obtained, the presence of a high
amount of mangosteen maintains the collagen fibrils stable, allowing
the deposition of a comparable amount of calcium phosphate. This lower
amount is related to the high cross-linking network formed in the
samples, which leads to a few binding sites to calcium phosphate.
Compared to the collagen-phosphorylated samples previously prepared,[16] the amount of mineral deposited is lower. Indeed,
the presence of phosphate groups in the collagen structure serves
as new nucleation sites for apatite formation inside the collagen
fibers, and consequently, that approach increases the calcium phosphate
precipitation.[37] Nevertheless, even though
phosphorylation assists the increase in the mineral amount, it does
not improve enough collagen triple helix stability. This feature is
achieved by inserting the mangosteen extract into the scaffolds.The inclusion of mangosteen extract in the collagen scaffolds had
a favorable effect on thermal stability, as the thermodegradation
onset temperature increased by about 36 to 45 °C compared to
the sample control (COL). Likewise, the mineralization process increased
the thermal stability of the collagen scaffolds, as the calculated
onset was 258.55 °C (COL_25) and 251.01 °C (COL_37). On
the other hand, the thermal stability decreased after the mineralization
in the scaffolds containing mangosteen extract, as onset temperature
values ranged from 254.64 °C (CM30_37) to 269.90 °C (CM10_37).The distribution and size of pores, porosity, and geometry of the
scaffolds are essential parameters for the materials used in tissue
engineering. Furthermore, pore interconnectivity and pore wall morphology
influence cell seeding, migration, mass transport, growth, gene expression,
and consequently the formation of new tissue.[38] An approach usually applied for surface pores is directly measuring
its structure in the SEM images. The main advantage of this method
consists of both precise visualization at high resolution and availability.Fish skin collagen scaffold presented porous structures homogeneously
distributed on the surface area with interconnected pores (Figure a), and the inclusion
of mangosteen extract did not change the existence of pores in the
scaffold (Figure b,c).
The control sample (COL) exhibited a pore size of 85.0 ± 7.4
μm (Table ),
and the extract concentration influenced pore size values. For the
CM10 sample, the calculated pore size did not change compared to the
control sample, while the addition of the highest extract concentration
enlarged the pore size up to 103.4 ± 8.8 μm
(CM30).
Figure 3
SEM surface images of the scaffolds: (A) COL, (B) CM10, and (C)
CM30.
Table 3
Pore Size, Porosity for All Scaffolds
and Ca/P Ratio, Crystallite Size, and Crystallinity Degree for the
Scaffoldsa
scaffold
pore size
(μm)
porosity (%)
Ca/P ratio ± SD
crystallite
size (nm)
degree of crystallinity (%)
COL
85.0 ± 7.4d
110.4
-
-
-
CM10
83.8 ± 22.9d
101.3
-
-
CM30
103.4 ± 8.8c
101.1
-
-
-
COL_25
142.3 ± 16.5b
96.2
1.68 ± 0.11a
31.5
0.697
COL_37
30.8 ± 4.1e
93.1
1.64 ± 0.04a,b
25.4
0.367
CM10_25
241.8 ± 33.1a
89.9
1.56 ± 0.05b,c
36.7
1.107
CM10_37
18.3 ± 14.9e
98.4
1.52 ± 0.04c
18.9
0.150
CM30_25
29.6 ± 1.9e
87.1
1.61 ± 0.16a,b,c
38.9
1.314
CM30_37
31.6 ± 2.6e
90.3
1.55 ± 0.09b,c
23.6
0.294
Same letter in the column means
no significant difference; significance level of 5%.
SEM surface images of the scaffolds: (A) COL, (B) CM10, and (C)
CM30.Same letter in the column means
no significant difference; significance level of 5%.SEM images of mineralized scaffolds indicated the
deposit of inorganic
minerals on the surface of all of the samples, and the observed behavior
was independent of the extract concentration or the temperature, demonstrating
the effectiveness of mineralization. The morphology of calcium phosphate
crystals observed in the scaffolds was spherical clusters with needle-shaped
crystals (Figures and S5-Sn).
Figure 4
SEM surface images of
the scaffolds mineralized at 25 °C:
(A) COL_25, (B) CM10_25, and (C) CM30_25. Image D emphasizes the EDX
result for the CM30_25 scaffold.
SEM surface images of
the scaffolds mineralized at 25 °C:
(A) COL_25, (B) CM10_25, and (C) CM30_25. Image D emphasizes the EDX
result for the CM30_25 scaffold.In the absence of mangosteen, the temperature used
in the mineralization
process influenced the calculated pore size, decreasing from 142.3
± 16.5 μm (COL_25) to 30.8 ± 4.1 μm (COL_37).
For samples containing 10% of mangosteen extract, the same behavior
was noted, as CM10_25 showed a pore size value of 241.8 ± 33.1
μm, while CM10_37 showed 18.3 ± 14.9 μm (Table ). The amount of deposit
calcium phosphate is probably related to the observed behavior. TGA
measurements of COL_25 and CM10_25 scaffolds revealed higher residue
values than those samples with the same composition but mineralized
at 37 °C.Oppositely, the scaffolds prepared with the highest
extract concentration
(CM30_25 and CM30_37) showed a similar pore size of around 30 μm
(Table ), assuming
that the temperature does not influence that characteristic in the
analyzed samples. Interestingly, these scaffolds displayed the same
amount of calcium phosphate (around 10.6%), calculated by TGA. With
these findings, we concluded that the temperature influences the characteristics
of the scaffolds in the absence of the extract or when its concentration
is low. Differently, at high mangosteen concentration, the temperature
has low or even no influence on the properties of the scaffolds, probably
by the high stability of collagen chains provided by the extract addition.It is a consensus that different pore sizes are involved in the
maturation of distinct tissues in the body. For example, for neovascularization,
a pore size of 5 μm is needed, while pores between 10–75
μm allow penetration of fibrous tissue. Pores of 75–100
μm are required for osteoid tissue growth and larger pores (100–350
μm) for bone regeneration.[39,40] Consequently,
all of the scaffolds prepared in this study are suitable for tissue
engineering applications.Additionally, a comparison of pore
size distribution as a function
of mangosteen extract concentration can be performed (Figure ).
Figure 5
Pore size distribution
for scaffolds: (A) nonmineralized, (B) mineralized
at 25 °C, and (C) mineralized at 37 °C.
Pore size distribution
for scaffolds: (A) nonmineralized, (B) mineralized
at 25 °C, and (C) mineralized at 37 °C.For nonmineralized samples (Figure A), an increase in pore size characteristics
was observed,
but the obtained values were not statistically different. The mangosteen
extract concentration (Figure B) strongly affected the property in scaffolds mineralized
at 25 °C, as in its absence or low concentration, large pore
sizes, and wide distribution was obtained. On the contrary, a small
pore size with a narrow distribution was noted in Figure C. Thus, the samples prepared
under these experimental conditions showed a similar quantity of phosphate
deposits, ranging from 7.4 to 10.7% (Table ), probably connected to the comparable pore
size.Different characterization techniques can be employed for the size
and quantity of pores evaluation. Still, not all are sensitive to
distinguishing between pores, blind pores (dead-end or saccate), or
closed pores. A method that uses a nonwetting liquid penetration to
measure the size and volume of pores is an alternative manner of calculating
the porosity of scaffolds. The porosity results reflect the evaluation
of interconnectivity characteristics in the scaffolds.[40]The porosity of scaffolds was calculated
by the mercury intrusion porosimetry test, and the results are given
in Table . The values
ranged from 87 to 110%, and mangosteen extract addition slightly decreased
porosity property. Furthermore, mineralization also induced a decrease
in porosity without, however, leading to a collapsed structure regardless
of the temperature used in the process. The values above 100% observed
for the nonmineralized samples might be related to the applied pressure
for mercury inclusion that forces a decrease in the volume sample.
It is known that an appropriate scaffold microstructure with porosity
values of about 80 to 90% is a remarkable feature for tissue engineering
applications, as this range provides enough space for nutrients and
gas exchange and cell proliferation and fixation, including bone cells.[41] Then, the mineralization process not only provides
a first signal recognition to induce bone tissue growth but also contributes
to obtaining scaffolds with appropriate porosity characteristics.
Al-Munajjed and O’Brien[42] described
a similar pattern for collagen scaffolds prepared with a bovine tendon,
as the mineralization process reduces the porosity of the samples.The EDX analysis confirmed the presence of calcium and phosphorous
on the surface of the scaffolds, as exemplified by the standard pattern
in Figure D. The stoichiometric
ratio of Ca/P for crystalline hydroxyapatite (HA) was 1.67, a stable
and low soluble phosphate form. The Ca/P ratio is an important parameter
that characterizes calcium phosphate inorganic ceramics. The calculated
values range from 1.52 ± 0.04 (CM10_37) to 1.68 ± 0.11 (COL_25),
depending on the extract concentration and the temperature applied
in the mineralization process (Table ). Ca/P ratios lower than 1.67, as observed for the
CM10_37, suggest that the calcium phosphate can be classified as calcium
phosphate deficient in calcium.[43] Even
though some of the scaffolds displayed values below the theoretical
HA one, it does not mean they are not feasible for the target application.
The obtained calcium phosphate deficient in the calcium phase is similar
to the ratio found in human bone in the initial mineralization phase.[44] That HA phase shows a high solubility and can
easily participate in the maturation and growth of the new bone tissue.
Figure 6
X-ray
diffraction patterns of mineralized scaffolds: (a) COL_25,
(b) CM10_25, (c) CM30_25, (d) COL_37, (e) CM10_37, and (f) CM30_37.
X-ray
diffraction patterns of mineralized scaffolds: (a) COL_25,
(b) CM10_25, (c) CM30_25, (d) COL_37, (e) CM10_37, and (f) CM30_37.
X-ray
The mineralized scaffolds
were examined by X-ray diffraction. Diffractograms for the mineralized
scaffolds showed a broad peak for collagen at approximately 20°,
along with peaks for calcium phosphate comparable to noncrystalline
HA (Figure ). No other
calcium salts or phosphates were detected according to JCPDS 9-0432.
Additionally, the HA characteristics peaks were observed at 25.94,
31.84, 39.38, 46.63, and 49.50° (2θ) corresponding to the
002, 211, 310, 222, and 213 crystallographic plans. The peaks showed
a wide pattern resulting from the small size and low crystallinity
of the HA deposited during the mineralization. Nevertheless, the findings
are similar to the HA characteristics found in the mineral phase of
natural bone.[45] The dimensions of apatite
crystals are described in the literature. Even though different values
are reported, they usually are a nanometric scale, ranging from 30
to 50 nm (length), 15 to 30 (width), and 2 to 10 nm (thickness).[46]The diffraction peak 002 measured the
crystalline grain size of the calcium phosphate deposited in the scaffolds.
Scherrer’s equation (eq ) was applied to calculate the crystallite size (Table ). Different behavior
was noted in the size of HA when mineralization temperature and the
inclusion of mangosteen extract were varied. At 25 °C, the experimental
condition induced hydroxyapatite formation with crystallite sizes
between 31.5–38.9 nm, increasing due to rising extract concentration.
Oppositely, at 37 °C, the mineralization induced the formation
of smaller crystallites that range from 18.9 to 25.4 nm, with a reduction
of this characteristic. Crystal size values agree with those reported
previously by other authors. Wang and Liu[43] developed composites with bovine collagen deposition of hydroxyapatite
and suggested that the crystallite size range of HA was 10–30
nm. Wan et al.[47] found crystallite sizes
of 37 and 46 nm for the HA crystals formed in the bacterial cellulose.
Rusu et al. observed a crystallite size range of 15–50 nm on
a chitosan matrix.[25] Besides, Elhendawi
et al.[48] prepared Chitosan/HA nanocomposites
using in situ coprecipitation technique and obtained a crystallite
size of about 15–21 nm.Besides, the degree of crystallinity
calculated by eq ranged
from 0.294 to 1.314, as
compiled in Table . Lower values are obtained for the high employed mineralization
temperature, and the mangosteen concentration affected only the property
of scaffolds mineralized at 25 °C. However, a previous study
reported an increased size of the crystallite and the degree of crystallinity
at high temperatures.[48] Although the deposited
HA shows crystallinity values close to 1, which means low crystallinity
properties, the obtained scaffolds are suitable for bone tissue applications.
Hydroxyapatite with these characteristics controls the resorbability
rate in tissue regeneration.[46]
Conclusions
Waste sources are good
alternatives for extracting valuable compounds
and applying them to tissue regeneration. This study proved that agro-industrial
waste and the discard of the aquatic processing industry are appropriate
sources of phenolic compounds and collagen, respectively. The mangosteen
peel can be considered a bioactive source by its antioxidant properties,
as confirmed by the ABTS and DPPH antioxidant assays with comparable
values to the literature. Its incorporation in the collagen scaffolds
provides functional prevention of the free radicals oxidation process.
The integrity of the triple helix of collagen was preserved during
its extraction, as confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy. Moreover, the increase
in extract concentration led to a high stabilization of the protein
molecule, as demonstrated by the rise in Td values.All of the
scaffolds showed a highly porous structure, demonstrating
that the introduction of the mangosteen extract and mineralization
had no negative effect on this parameter. Its features play an essential
role in calcium phosphate nucleation, as pores and porosity are considered
key characteristics for tissue engineering scaffolds.Diverse
behavior was observed as an effect of composition and mineralization
temperature on scaffold properties. In general, similar characteristics
like calcium phosphate, pore size, and porosity were noted in the
absence of extract and at a lower concentration. On the contrary,
at a high mangosteen content, the temperature had only a marginal
influence on the properties of the scaffolds, probably due to the
high stability of collagen chains provided by the extract addition.Thus, the scaffolds could contribute to the formation of bone tissue,
as the HA crystallites deposited in the mineralization process have
similar characteristics to the calcium phosphate phase found in human
bone in the initial mineralization process. Additionally, the low
degree of crystallinity infers that it can be reabsorbed in
vivo.
Authors: Viorel Marin Rusu; Chuen-How Ng; Max Wilke; Brigitte Tiersch; Peter Fratzl; Martin G Peter Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Eduardo P Milan; Murilo Á V Rodrigues; Virginia C A Martins; Ana M G Plepis; Thomas Fuhrmann-Lieker; Marilia M Horn Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 4.411