| Literature DB >> 34068232 |
Eduardo P Milan1,2, Murilo Á V Rodrigues3, Virginia C A Martins3, Ana M G Plepis1,3, Thomas Fuhrmann-Lieker2, Marilia M Horn2.
Abstract
In this study, a potential hard tissue substitute was mimicked using collagen/mangosteen porous scaffolds. Collagen was extracted fromEntities:
Keywords: fish skin collagen; mangosteen; mineralization; phosphorylation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34068232 PMCID: PMC8153159 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26102899
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1SDS-PAGE of (A) a protein marker; and (B) the extracted collagen from Tilapia skin.
Figure 2Quantitative comparison of phosphorous contents in phosphorylated scaffolds. (Same letter in the graphs means no significant difference; significance level of 5%).
Figure 3FTIR spectra of (A) collagen and phosphorylated collagen scaffolds: (a) C; (b) CP; (c) C10P; and (d) C30P, and (B) mineralized scaffolds: (a) CP25; (b) C10P25; (c) C10P37; (d) C30P25 and (e) C30P37.
FTIR band intensity ratio.
| Scheme 1240. | 1240/1450 cm−1 Ratio |
|---|---|
| C | 0.96 |
| CP | 1.01 |
| C10P | 1.02 |
| C30P | 1.03 |
| CP25 | 1.04 |
| C10P25 | 1.04 |
| C30P25 | 1.00 |
| C10P37 | 1.01 |
| C30P37 | 0.98 |
Figure 4FTIR spectrum of the extract obtained from the mangosteen peel.
Figure 5DSC curves of the scaffolds. In (a) C; (b) CP; (c) C10P; and (d) C30P.
Denaturation temperature (Td) for the scaffolds.
| Scaffold | Denaturation Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|
| C | 33.5 |
| CP | 40.4 |
| C10P | 41.2 |
| C30P | 41.1 |
Figure 6TGA curves for (a) CP25, (b) C10P25; (c) C10P37; (d) CP; and (e) C10P.
Figure 7TGA curves for (a) C30P37; (b) C30P25; (c) C30P; and (d) C.
Percentage of weight loss at different temperature range, residue percentage, and Tonset of scaffolds, obtained through TGA.
| Scaffold | % Weight Loss | %Residue (700 °C) | Tonset (°C) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30–200 °C | 200–500 °C | 500–700 °C | |||
| C | 8.34 | 63.16 | 27.54 | 1.04 | 228.8 |
| CP | 5.16 | 61.10 | 30.78 | 2.97 | 240.4 |
| C10P | 6.20 | 74.73 | 17.69 | 1.38 | 245.0 |
| C30P | 7.81 | 72.60 | 16.93 | 3.70 | 250.4 |
| CP25 | 9.60 | 43.25 | 11.63 | 35.52 | 247.8 |
| C10P25 | 7.91 | 54.32 | 8.58 | 29.19 | 249.8 |
| C30P25 | 7.88 | 59.97 | 7.48 | 24.68 | 255.2 |
| C10P37 | 8.96 | 56.15 | 8.04 | 26.85 | 262.9 |
| C30P37 | 5.72 | 61.30 | 8.47 | 24.50 | 259.9 |
Figure 8SEM Micrographs of collagen scaffold before and after phosphorylation. (A) C, (B) CP, (C) C10P, (D) C30P. Magnification of 200×.
Figure 9SEM Micrographs of collagen scaffold and calcium phosphate mineralization. (A) CP25; (B) C10P25, with respective EDX insert; (C) C30P25 (Magnification of 700×) and (D) C30P25 (Magnification of 12,000×).
Scaffolds average pore size.
| Scaffold | Average Pore Size (μM) ± SD |
|---|---|
| C | 85.0 ± 7.4 a |
| CP | 54.3 ± 8.4 b |
| C10P | 54.9 ± 8.6 b |
| C30P | 52.0 ± 7.7 b |
| CP25 | 5.9 ± 1.0 d |
| C10P25 | 24.5 ± 6.6 c |
| C30P25 | 21.1 ± 3.1 c |
| C10P37 | 24.6 ± 3.3 c |
| C30P37 | 21.5 ± 3.1 c |
Note: Same letter in the column means no significant difference; significance level of 5%.
Ca/P ratio for biomineralized scaffolds.
| Scaffold | Ca/P Ratio ± SD |
|---|---|
| CP25 | 1.53 ± 0.10 c |
| C10P25 | 1.73 ± 0.07 b |
| C30P25 | 1.74 ± 0.08 b |
| C10P37 | 1.91 ± 0.04 a |
| C30P37 | 1.73 ± 0.09 a,b |
Note: Same letter in the column means no significant difference; significance level of 5%.