Literature DB >> 36156104

Modified shockwave propulsion lithotripsy improves the lower pole renal stone clearance.

Arthur Grabsky1,2, Karen Arzumanyan1, Gor Shadyan1,2, Aram Aloyan2, Lilit Ayvazyan1, Begoña Ballesta Martinez3, Arman Tsaturyan4.   

Abstract

The shockwave lithotripsy is an established modality for the treatment of urinary stone disease. The aim of the study was to present our modified shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) technique, a shockwave propulsion lithotripsy (SWPL) technique, for the treatment of lower pole renal stones and compare its clinical outcomes with the standard SWL technique. An evaluation of a prospectively collected database including 168 patients divided into two groups and treated with ultrasound-guided SWL (n = 80) and SWPL (n = 88) were included in our study. The data were collected between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients older than 18 years old with single lower pole stones sized up to 2 cm were included in the study. SWPL was associated with significant higher SFR compared to standard SWL (85.2 vs. 62.5%, p = 0.001) and required less applied shockwaves (2151 vs. 2502, p = 0.001). Most of the patients in both groups underwent only one SWL session. Overall, a 7.1% complication rate (12 out of 168 patients) was reported, with no difference between groups. In conclusion, our proposed SWPL technique was aimed to overcome difficulties associated with the gravity and anatomic specificities of the lower pole, increased SFR and decreased the need for additional treatment.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lower pole renal stones; Shockwave lithotripsy; Shockwave propulsion; Ultrasound-guided lithotripsy; Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36156104     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01361-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   2.861


  19 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system?

Authors:  Hansjörg Danuser; Roger Müller; Bernard Descoeudres; Eduard Dobry; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Controlled inversion therapy: an adjunct to the elimination of gravity-dependent fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  N Brownlee; M Foster; D P Griffith; C E Carlton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Panteleimon Ntasiotis; Bhaskar Somani; Constantinos Adamou; Esteban Emiliani; Thomas Knoll; Andreas Skolarikos; Thomas Tailly
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; Y I Siegel; B Steele; A W Nyhuis; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.

Authors:  Attasit Srisubat; Somkiat Potisat; Bannakij Lojanapiwat; Vasun Setthawong; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-24

6.  A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Pawan Vasudeva; Biswajit Nanda; Niraj Kumar; Manoj Kumar Das; Sanjeev Kumar Jha
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 7.  EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones.

Authors:  Philip C May; Michael R Bailey; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.309

9.  Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Doo Yong Chung; Dong Hyuk Kang; Kang Su Cho; Won Sik Jeong; Hae Do Jung; Jong Kyou Kwon; Seon Heui Lee; Joo Yong Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy laser lithotripsy for treatment of urinary stones smaller than 2 cm: a cost-utility analysis in the Spanish clinical setting.

Authors:  Gema Romeu; Leopoldo José Marzullo-Zucchet; Javier Díaz; Sara Villarroya; Alberto Budía; Domingo de Guzmán Ordaz; Vicent Caballer; David Vivas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.