Philip C May1, Michael R Bailey, Jonathan D Harper. 1. aDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine bCenter for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ultrasonic propulsion is a novel technique that uses short bursts of focused ultrasonic pulses to reposition stones transcutaneously within the renal collecting system and ureter. The purpose of this review is to discuss the initial testing of effectiveness and safety, directions for refinement of technique and technology, and opinions on clinical application. RECENT FINDINGS: Preclinical studies with a range of probes, interfaces, and outputs have demonstrated feasibility and consistent safety of ultrasonic propulsion with room for increased outputs and refinement toward specific applications. Ultrasonic propulsion was used painlessly and without adverse events to reposition stones in 14 of 15 human study participants without restrictions on patient size, stone size, or stone location. The initial feasibility study showed applicability in a range of clinically relevant situations, including facilitating passage of residual fragments following ureteroscopy or shock wave lithotripsy, moving a large stone at the ureteropelvic junction with relief of pain, and differentiating large stones from a collection of small fragments. SUMMARY: Ultrasonic propulsion shows promise as an office-based system for transcutaneously repositioning kidney stones. Potential applications include facilitating expulsion of residual fragments following ureteroscopy or shock wave lithotripsy, repositioning stones prior to treatment, and repositioning obstructing ureteropelvic junction stones into the kidney to alleviate acute renal colic.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ultrasonic propulsion is a novel technique that uses short bursts of focused ultrasonic pulses to reposition stones transcutaneously within the renal collecting system and ureter. The purpose of this review is to discuss the initial testing of effectiveness and safety, directions for refinement of technique and technology, and opinions on clinical application. RECENT FINDINGS: Preclinical studies with a range of probes, interfaces, and outputs have demonstrated feasibility and consistent safety of ultrasonic propulsion with room for increased outputs and refinement toward specific applications. Ultrasonic propulsion was used painlessly and without adverse events to reposition stones in 14 of 15 human study participants without restrictions on patient size, stone size, or stone location. The initial feasibility study showed applicability in a range of clinically relevant situations, including facilitating passage of residual fragments following ureteroscopy or shock wave lithotripsy, moving a large stone at the ureteropelvic junction with relief of pain, and differentiating large stones from a collection of small fragments. SUMMARY: Ultrasonic propulsion shows promise as an office-based system for transcutaneously repositioning kidney stones. Potential applications include facilitating expulsion of residual fragments following ureteroscopy or shock wave lithotripsy, repositioning stones prior to treatment, and repositioning obstructing ureteropelvic junction stones into the kidney to alleviate acute renal colic.
Authors: Ryan S Hsi; Barbrina Dunmire; Bryan W Cunitz; Xuemei He; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper; Michael R Bailey; Thomas S Lendvay Journal: J Endourol Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Douglas L Miller; Nadine B Smith; Michael R Bailey; Gregory J Czarnota; Kullervo Hynynen; Inder Raj S Makin Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Chandra Aubin; John Bailitz; Rimon N Bengiamin; Carlos A Camargo; Jill Corbo; Anthony J Dean; Ruth B Goldstein; Richard T Griffey; Gregory D Jay; Tarina L Kang; Dana R Kriesel; O John Ma; Michael Mallin; William Manson; Joy Melnikow; Diana L Miglioretti; Sara K Miller; Lisa D Mills; James R Miner; Michelle Moghadassi; Vicki E Noble; Gregory M Press; Marshall L Stoller; Victoria E Valencia; Jessica Wang; Ralph C Wang; Steven R Cummings Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kathryn R Nightingale; Charles C Church; Gerald Harris; Keith A Wear; Michael R Bailey; Paul L Carson; Hui Jiang; Kurt L Sandstrom; Thomas L Szabo; Marvin C Ziskin Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Anup Shah; Jonathan D Harper; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Marla Paun; Julianna C Simon; Wei Lu; Peter J Kaczkowski; Michael R Bailey Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jonathan D Harper; Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Franklin C Lee; Mathew D Sorensen; Ryan S Hsi; Jeff Thiel; Hunter Wessells; James E Lingeman; Michael R Bailey Journal: J Urol Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Maria M Karzova; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Vera A Khokhlova; Bryan W Cunitz; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Karmon M Janssen; Timothy C Brand; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; H Denny Liggitt; Jeff Thiel; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper; Michael R Bailey; Barbrina Dunmire Journal: J Endourol Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Michael R Bailey Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Karmon M Janssen; Timothy C Brand; Michael R Bailey; Bryan W Cunitz; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Barbrina Dunmire Journal: Urology Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Mohamed A Ghanem; Adam D Maxwell; Wayne Kreider; Bryan W Cunitz; Vera A Khokhlova; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 2.725