Literature DB >> 8308977

Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis.

J E Lingeman1, Y I Siegel, B Steele, A W Nyhuis, J R Woods.   

Abstract

The results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL*) and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for the treatment of lower pole nephrolithiasis were examined in 32 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous nephrostolithotomy at the Methodist Hospital of Indiana and through meta-analysis of publications providing adequate stratification of treatment results. Of 101 cases managed with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy 91 (90%) were stone-free, a result significantly better than that achieved with ESWL (1,733 of 2,927 stone-free, 59%). Stone-free rates with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy were independent of stone burden, whereas stone-free rates with ESWL were inversely correlated to the stone burden treated. The morbidity of patients undergoing percutaneous nephrostolithotomy at our hospital was minimal, with a mean hospital stay of 4.7 +/- 2.8 days. No blood transfusions were required. All patients became stone-free. The percentage of urolithiasis patients with lower pole calculi is increasing. Because of the significantly greater efficacy of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole calculi, particularly stones larger than 10 mm. in diameter, further consideration should be given to an initial approach with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8308977     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35042-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  47 in total

Review 1.  [Controversy on lower pole stones: monitor or intervene?].

Authors:  A Häcker; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy for the passage of lower pole kidney stones following shock wave lithotripsy].

Authors:  S Schmidt; K Wilhelm
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Pelvi-calyceal height, a predictor of success when treating lower pole stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  A Symes; G Shaw; D Corry; S Choong
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-06-04

4.  Urology Update from Jackson Hole: Highlights from the 3rd Annual Jackson Hole Summer Urologic Conference July 28-August 3, 2001, Jackson Hole, WY.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

5.  The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozgür Tan; Lokman Irkilata; Ilker Sen; Metin Onaran; Bora Küpeli; Ustünol Karaoğlan; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-04-20

6.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.

Authors:  Reem Al-Bareeq; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  [Lower pole calyceal stones].

Authors:  U Nagele; T Knoll; D Schilling; M S Michel; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Chien-Hsing Chang; Chung-Jing Wang; Shi-Wei Huang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-02-18

9.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Optimal Management of Lower Polar Calyceal Stone 15 to 20 mm.

Authors:  Naveed Haroon; Syed M Nazim; M Hammad Ather
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.