Literature DB >> 17400366

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system?

Hansjörg Danuser1, Roger Müller, Bernard Descoeudres, Eduard Dobry, Urs E Studer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of lower calyx stones has been criticized because of the high incidence of residual fragments. Controversial results have been reported regarding the stone-free rate after ESWL depending on the influence of the collecting system anatomy on stone clearance. Therefore we evaluated our stone-free rate after ESWL of lower calyx stones and searched for correlations to various anatomic parameters of the collecting system.
METHODS: Ninety-six patients with isolated lower calyx stones treated exclusively with ESWL (Dornier HM3) were evaluated 3 mo postoperatively. The results were correlated with the following anatomic parameters of the collecting system as determined from the pretreatment intravenous urography: (1) lower infundibulum width, (2) lower infundibulum length, (3) infundibulopelvic angle, (4) volume of the collecting system. Follow-ups were performed 24 h after ESWL with an abdominal plain film and 3 mo postoperatively with a urography or abdominal plain X-ray together with renal ultrasound.
RESULTS: Three months postoperatively, 68% of all patients were stone free, including 69% of the patients with stones initially < or =1 cm, and 67% of the patients with stones >1 cm. Stone-free patients compared with patients having residual fragments had no significant differences in infundibulum width, infundibulum length, infundibulopelvic angle, or collecting system volume.
CONCLUSIONS: A stone-free rate 3 mo after ESWL of 68% overall justifies ESWL as a possible treatment option for lower calyx stones. Influence of the collecting system anatomy on disintegrate clearance from the lower calyx could not be demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17400366     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  16 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

2.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy results: Analysis of 279 cases.

Authors:  Fatih Elbir; İsmail Başıbüyük; Ramazan Topaktaş; Sina Kardaş; Muhammed Tosun; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Abdullah Armağan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  [S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium].

Authors:  T Knoll; T Bach; U Humke; A Neisius; R Stein; M Schönthaler; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Surgical planning and manual image fusion based on 3D model facilitate laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for intrarenal tumors.

Authors:  Yuanbo Chen; Hulin Li; Dingtao Wu; Keming Bi; Chunxiao Liu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.

Authors:  G Bozzini; P Verze; D Arcaniolo; O Dal Piaz; N M Buffi; G Guazzoni; M Provenzano; B Osmolorskij; F Sanguedolce; E Montanari; N Macchione; K Pummer; V Mirone; M De Sio; G Taverna
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Shock wave technology and application: an update.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll; Kai-Uwe Köhrmann; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman; Robin O Cleveland; Michael R Bailey; Christian Chaussy
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Modified shockwave propulsion lithotripsy improves the lower pole renal stone clearance.

Authors:  Arthur Grabsky; Karen Arzumanyan; Gor Shadyan; Aram Aloyan; Lilit Ayvazyan; Begoña Ballesta Martinez; Arman Tsaturyan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.861

8.  Previous shock-wave lithotripsy treatment does not impact the outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Emrah Yürük; Murat Binbay; Tolga Akman; Faruk Özgör; Yalçın Berberoğlu; Ahmet Yaser Müslümanoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-12

9.  Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.

Authors:  Nevzat Can Sener; M Abdurrahim Imamoglu; Okan Bas; Ufuk Ozturk; H N Goksel Goktug; Can Tuygun; Hasan Bakirtas
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Management of Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments following Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Elisa Cicerello; Franco Merlo; Luigi Maccatrozzo
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.