Literature DB >> 3611135

Effects of an anatomically detailed erector spinae model on L4/L5 disc compression and shear.

S M McGill, R W Norman.   

Abstract

Biomechanical models utilized for analysis of tasks that load the lumbar spine often predict the resultant moment, disc compression and sometimes shear. Usually the extensor muscular and ligament forces of the lumbar spine are assumed to act 5 cm posterior to a disc centre of rotation. This study has re-examined the generation and pathways of muscular force transmission within the extensor musculature. The effects on L4/L5 disc compression and shear estimates of an anatomically and biomechanically justifiable range of tissue moment arms, lines of force and force generating capacity of muscle, input to a computer model, have been determined. Results indicated that L4/L5 compression estimates could be reduced by up to 35% when the output from a more realistic anatomical model of the erector spinae muscle group was compared with that from the frequently reported and simplified single muscle equivalent with a 5 cm moment arm. The shear force estimates could be altered from more than 500 N (L4 tending to shear anteriorly on L5) to less than 200 N with L4 tending to shear posteriorly on L5. Using the combination of input variables considered by the authors to be most feasible to estimate compression, a single 'equivalent' extensor soft tissue moment arm of 7.5 rather than 5 cm would be needed to equate the compression. This simplification of course, does not accommodate the shear force estimate problem.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3611135     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90280-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  The instant axis of rotation influences facet forces at L5/S1 during flexion/extension and lateral bending.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Rousseau; David S Bradford; Tamer M Hadi; Kirk L Pedersen; Jeffery C Lotz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  An investigation into the use of MR imaging to determine the functional cross sectional area of lumbar paraspinal muscles.

Authors:  Craig A Ranson; Angus F Burnett; Robert Kerslake; Mark E Batt; Peter B O'Sullivan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.

Authors:  P J Lee; K P Granata
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Feature Detection and Biomechanical Analysis to Objectively Identify High Exposure Movement Strategies When Performing the EPIC Lift Capacity test.

Authors:  Daniel P Armstrong; Aleksandra R Budarick; Claragh E E Pegg; Ryan B Graham; Steven L Fischer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03

5.  A new method to approximate load-displacement relationships of spinal motion segments for patient-specific multi-body models of scoliotic spine.

Authors:  Athena Jalalian; Francis E H Tay; Soheil Arastehfar; Gabriel Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Quantifying relationships between selected work-related risk factors and back pain: a systematic review of objective biomechanical measures and cost-related health outcomes.

Authors:  Nancy A Nelson; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.656

7.  Kinetic and kinematic differences between deadlifts and goodmornings.

Authors:  Florian Schellenberg; Julia Lindorfer; Renate List; William R Taylor; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-12-07

8.  Sitting position affects performance in cross-country sit-skiing.

Authors:  M Lund Ohlsson; M S Laaksonen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Stretching the Spines of Gymnasts: A Review.

Authors:  William A Sands; Jeni R McNeal; Gabriella Penitente; Steven Ross Murray; Lawrence Nassar; Monèm Jemni; Satoshi Mizuguchi; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.