Literature DB >> 16540437

Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.

P J Lee1, K P Granata.   

Abstract

Handle or interface design can influence torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks. The objective of the study was to provide insight into the role of interface stability with regard to torso muscle recruitment and biomechanical loads on the spine. Fourteen subjects generated voluntary isometric trunk flexion force against a rigid interface and similar flexion exertions against an unstable interface, which simulated handle design in a cart pushing task. Normalized electromyographic (EMG) activity in the rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique muscles increased with exertion effort. When using the unstable interface, EMG activity in the internal and external oblique muscle groups was greater than when using the rigid interface. Results agreed with trends from a biomechanical model implemented to predict the muscle activation necessary to generate isometric pushing forces and maintain spinal stability when using the two different interface designs. The co-contraction contributed to increased spinal load when using the unstable interface. It was concluded that handle or interface design and stability may influence spinal load and associated risk of musculoskeletal injury during manual materials tasks that involve pushing exertions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16540437      PMCID: PMC1630675          DOI: 10.1080/00140130500485285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  36 in total

1.  Cost-benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability.

Authors:  K P Granata; W S Marras
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.

Authors:  J R Davis; G A Mirka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Response of trunk muscle coactivation to changes in spinal stability.

Authors:  K P Granata; K F Orishimo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The mechanics of torso flexion: situps and standing dynamic flexion manoeuvres.

Authors:  S M McGill
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  The development of an EMG-assisted model to assess spine loading during whole-body free-dynamic lifting.

Authors:  W S. Marras; K P. Granata
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 6.  Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering.

Authors:  A Bergmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

7.  A method for measuring external loads during dynamic lifting exertions.

Authors:  K P Granata; W S Marras; F A Fathallah
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A revised anatomical model of the abdominal musculature for torso flexion efforts.

Authors:  S M McGill
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Mechanical loading on the low back in three methods of refuse collecting.

Authors:  M P de Looze; A R Stassen; A M Markslag; M J Borst; M M Wooning; H M Toussaint
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  The back compressive forces during maximal push-pull activities in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  S Kumar
Journal:  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)       Date:  1994-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.