Literature DB >> 16175392

The instant axis of rotation influences facet forces at L5/S1 during flexion/extension and lateral bending.

Marc-Antoine Rousseau1, David S Bradford, Tamer M Hadi, Kirk L Pedersen, Jeffery C Lotz.   

Abstract

Because the disc and facets work together to constrain spinal kinematics, changes in the instant axis of rotation associated with disc degeneration or disc replacement may adversely influence risk for facet overloading and arthritis. The relationships between L5/S1 segmental kinematics and facet forces are not well defined, since previous studies have separated investigations of spinal motion and facet force. The goal of this cadaveric biomechanical study was to report and correlate a measure of intervertebral kinematics (the centrode, or the path of the instant axis of rotation) and the facet forces at the L5/S1 motion segment while under a physiologic combination of compression and anterior shear loading. Twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric L5/S1 joints (age range 50-64 years) were tested biomechanically under semi-constrained conditions by applying compression plus shear forces in several postures: neutral, and 3 degrees and 6 degrees of flexion, extension and lateral bending. The experimental boundary conditions imposed compression and shear representative of in vivo conditions during upright stance. The 3-D instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) was calculated between two consecutive postures. The facet joint force was simultaneously measured using thin-film sensors placed between both facet surfaces. Variations of IAR location and facet force during motion were analyzed. During flexion and extension, the IAR was oriented laterally. The IAR intersection with the mid-sagittal plane moved cephalad relative to S1 endplate during flexion (P=0.010), and posterior during extension (P=0.001). The facet force did not correlate with posture (P=0.844). However, changes in the facet force between postures did correlate with IAR position: higher IAR's during flexion correlated with lower facet forces and vice versa (P=0.04). During lateral bending, the IAR was oblique relative to the main plane of motion and translated parallel to S1 endplate, toward the side of the bending. Overall, the facet force was increased on the ipsilateral side of bending (P=0.002). The IAR positions demonstrate that the L5 vertebral body primarily rotates forward during flexion (IAR close to vertebral body center) and rotates/translates backward during extension (IAR at or below the L5/S1 intervertebral disc). In lateral bending, the IAR obliquity demonstrated coupling with axial torsion due to resistance of the ipsilateral facet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16175392      PMCID: PMC3489304          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0935-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  42 in total

1.  In vitro axial preload application during spine flexibility testing: towards reduced apparatus-related artefacts.

Authors:  P A Cripton; S B Bruehlmann; T E Orr; T R Oxland; L P Nolte
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  H M Mayer; K Wiechert; A Korge; I Qose
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spine arthroplasty: a historical review.

Authors:  Marek Szpalski; Robert Gunzburg; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Normal and spondylolytic pediatric spine movements with reference to instantaneous axis of rotation.

Authors:  Tadanori Sakamaki; Shinsuke Katoh; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves.

Authors:  J Legaye; G Duval-Beaupère; J Hecquet; C Marty
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Effects of posture and structure on three-dimensional coupled rotations in the lumbar spine. A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  J Cholewicki; J J Crisco; T R Oxland; I Yamamoto; M M Panjabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The load on lumbar disks in different positions of the body.

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1966 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charité artificial disc.

Authors:  Helmut D Link
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; Selva Kumar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine.

Authors:  G Vaz; P Roussouly; E Berthonnaud; J Dimnet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  18 in total

1.  Segmental lumbar rotation in patients with discogenic low back pain during functional weight-bearing activities.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozanek; Qun Xia; Weishi Li; Brian Grottkau; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Elisabeth Haas; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; Christoph Weiler; Andreas G Nerlich; Michael H Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.

Authors:  Gregory G Knapik; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Kinematics of cervical segments C5/C6 in axial rotation before and after total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Michael Wachowski; Jan Weiland; Markus Wagner; Riccardo Gezzi; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Hans Nägerl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Morphometry evaluations of cervical osseous endplates based on three dimensional reconstructions.

Authors:  Hang Feng; Haoxi Li; Zhaoyu Ba; Zhaoxiong Chen; Xinhua Li; Desheng Wu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Investigation of coupled bending of the lumbar spine during dynamic axial rotation of the body.

Authors:  Jae-Hyuk Shin; Shaobai Wang; Qi Yao; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Biomechanics of intervertebral disk degeneration.

Authors:  Nozomu Inoue; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Clinical and statistical correlation of various lumbar pathological conditions.

Authors:  J Michael Johnson; Mohamed Mahfouz; Nicholas V Battaglia; Adrija Sharma; Joseph S Cheng; Richard D Komistek
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  ISSLS Prize in Bioengineering Science 2021: in vivo sagittal motion of the lumbar spine in low back pain patients-a radiological big data study.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Frank Niemeyer; Youping Tao; Andrea Cina; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Annette Kienle; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Sagittal plane rotation center of lower lumbar spine during a dynamic weight-lifting activity.

Authors:  Zhan Liu; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Shaobai Wang; Minfei Wu; Weiye Zhong; Jing-Sheng Li; Thomas Cha; Kirk Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.