Literature DB >> 27669701

A new method to approximate load-displacement relationships of spinal motion segments for patient-specific multi-body models of scoliotic spine.

Athena Jalalian1, Francis E H Tay2, Soheil Arastehfar2, Gabriel Liu3.   

Abstract

Load-displacement relationships of spinal motion segments are crucial factors in characterizing the stiffness of scoliotic spine models to mimic the spine responses to loads. Although nonlinear approach to approximation of the relationships can be superior to linear ones, little mention has been made to deriving personalized nonlinear load-displacement relationships in previous studies. A method is developed for nonlinear approximation of load-displacement relationships of spinal motion segments to assist characterizing in vivo the stiffness of spine models. We propose approximation by tangent functions and focus on rotational displacements in lateral direction. The tangent functions are characterized using lateral bending test. A multi-body model was characterized to 18 patients and utilized to simulate four spine positions; right bending, left bending, neutral, and traction. The same was done using linear functions to assess the performance of the proposed tangent function in comparison with the linear function. Root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the displacements estimated by the tangent functions was 44 % smaller than the linear functions. This shows the ability of our tangent function in approximation of the relationships for a range of infinitesimal to large displacements involved in the spine movement to the four positions. In addition, the models based on the tangent functions yielded 67, 55, and 39 % smaller RMSEs of Ferguson angles, locations of vertebrae, and orientations of vertebrae, respectively, implying better estimates of spine responses to loads. Overall, it can be concluded that our method for approximating load-displacement relationships of spinal motion segments can offer good estimates of scoliotic spine stiffness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nonlinear load–displacement relationship; Patient-specific multi-body model; Scoliosis; Spinal motion segment; Spine stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27669701     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-016-1576-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  35 in total

1.  Measurement of a spinal motion segment stiffness matrix.

Authors:  Ian A Stokes; Mack Gardner-Morse; David Churchill; Jeffrey P Laible
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Three-dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; R A Brand; A A White
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Preoperative planning simulator for spinal deformity surgeries.

Authors:  C E Aubin; H Labelle; C Chevrefils; G Desroches; J Clin; A Boivin M Eng
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  On the stiffness matrix of the intervertebral joint: application to total disk replacement.

Authors:  Oliver M O'Reilly; Melodie F Metzger; Jenni M Buckley; David A Moody; Jeffrey C Lotz
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  A forward dynamics simulation of human lumbar spine flexion predicting the load sharing of intervertebral discs, ligaments, and muscles.

Authors:  T K Rupp; W Ehlers; N Karajan; M Günther; S Schmitt
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-02-05

6.  Effect of Lowest Instrumented Vertebra on Trunk Mobility in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing a Posterior Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Ubong I Udoekwere; Joseph J Krzak; Adam Graf; Sahar Hassani; Sergey Tarima; Mary Riordan; Peter F Sturm; Kim W Hammerberg; Purnendu Gupta; Alireza K Anissipour; Gerald F Harris
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2014-07-02

7.  Pelvic mobility when bending forward in standing position: validity and reliability of 2 motion analysis devices.

Authors:  C Perret; S Poiraudeau; J Fermanian; M Revel
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  Biomechanics of the human spine and trunk.

Authors:  J A Ashton-Miller; A B Schultz
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.230

9.  Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity.

Authors:  I A Stokes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle.

Authors:  Frank Heuer; Hendrik Schmidt; Zdenek Klezl; Lutz Claes; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.